Pedagogical Alignment of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05000v3
• Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 08:49:17 GMT
• Title: Pedagogical Alignment of Large Language Models
• Authors: Shashank Sonkar, Kangqi Ni, Sapana Chaudhary, Richard G. Baraniuk,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) provide immediate answers rather than guiding students through the problem-solving process. This paper investigates Learning from Human Preferences (LHP) algorithms to achieve this alignment objective.
• Score: 24.427653091950994
• License:
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), when used in educational settings without pedagogical fine-tuning, often provide immediate answers rather than guiding students through the problem-solving process. This approach falls short of pedagogically best practices and limits their effectiveness as educational tools. We term the objective of training LLMs to emulate effective teaching strategies as `pedagogical alignment.' In this paper, we investigate Learning from Human Preferences (LHP) algorithms to achieve this alignment objective. A key challenge in this process is the scarcity of high-quality preference datasets to guide the alignment. To address this, we propose a novel approach for constructing a large-scale dataset using synthetic data generation techniques, eliminating the need for time-consuming and costly manual annotation. Leveraging this dataset, our experiments with Llama and Mistral models demonstrate that LHP methods outperform standard supervised fine-tuning (SFT), improving pedagogical alignment accuracy by 13.1% and 8.7% respectively. Existing evaluation methods also lack quantitative metrics to adequately measure the pedagogical alignment of LLMs. To address this gap, we propose novel perplexity-based metrics that quantify LLMs' tendency to provide scaffolded guidance versus direct answers, offering a robust measure of pedagogical alignment. Our analysis provides compelling evidence for the superiority of LHP methods over SFT in optimizing LLMs' behavior, underscoring the potential of LHP methods in better aligning LLMs with educational objectives and fostering effective learning experiences. Code and models are available \href{https://github.com/luffycodes/Tutorbot-Spock}{here}.

Related papers

• A Little Help Goes a Long Way: Efficient LLM Training by Leveraging Small LMs [74.35290684163718]
  A primary challenge in large language model (LLM) development is their onerous pre-training cost. This paper explores a promising paradigm to improve LLM pre-training efficiency and quality by leveraging a small language model (SLM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T14:31:52Z)
• Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Models [11.504012974208466]
  This work focuses on investigating machine unlearning for Large Language Models motivated by data protection regulations. We propose a framework textbfSoft textbfPrompting for textbfUntextbflearning (SPUL) We conduct a rigorous evaluation of the proposed method and our results indicate that SPUL can significantly improve the trade-off between utility and forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T19:11:40Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Towards Optimal Learning of Language Models [124.65669486710992]
  We present a theory for the optimal learning of language models (LMs) We derive a theorem, named Learning Law, to reveal the properties of the dynamics in the optimal learning process under our objective. We empirically verify that the optimal learning of LMs essentially stems from the improvement of the coefficients in the scaling law of LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T18:52:19Z)
• How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
• Learning From Failure: Integrating Negative Examples when Fine-tuning Large Language Models as Agents [41.14201835950814]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved success in acting as agents, which interact with environments through tools such as search engines. Previous work has first collected interaction trajectories between LLMs and environments, using only trajectories that successfully finished the task to fine-tune smaller models. We argue that unsuccessful trajectories offer valuable insights, and LLMs can learn from these trajectories through appropriate quality control and fine-tuning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T17:10:07Z)
• Learning Semantic Proxies from Visual Prompts for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Deep Metric Learning [13.964106147449051]
  Existing solutions concentrate on fine-tuning the pre-trained models on conventional image datasets. We propose a novel and effective framework based on learning Visual Prompts (VPT) in the pre-trained Vision Transformers (ViT) We demonstrate that our new approximations with semantic information are superior to representative capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:42:05Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.