Peeking with PEAK: Sequential, Nonparametric Composite Hypothesis Tests for Means of Multiple Data Streams
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06122v3
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:41:02 GMT
- Title: Peeking with PEAK: Sequential, Nonparametric Composite Hypothesis Tests for Means of Multiple Data Streams
- Authors: Brian Cho, Kyra Gan, Nathan Kallus,
- Abstract summary: We build upon the testing-by-betting framework and provide a non-asymptotic $alpha$-level test across any stopping time.
Our experiments show that PEAK provides up to an 85% reduction in the number of samples before stopping.
- Score: 38.04922933299814
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We propose a novel nonparametric sequential test for composite hypotheses for means of multiple data streams. Our proposed method, \emph{peeking with expectation-based averaged capital} (PEAK), builds upon the testing-by-betting framework and provides a non-asymptotic $\alpha$-level test across any stopping time. Our contributions are two-fold: (1) we propose a novel betting scheme and provide theoretical guarantees on type-I error control, power, and asymptotic growth rate/$e$-power in the setting of a single data stream; (2) we introduce PEAK, a generalization of this betting scheme to multiple streams, that (i) avoids using wasteful union bounds via averaging, (ii) is a test of power one under mild regularity conditions on the sampling scheme of the streams, and (iii) reduces computational overhead when applying the testing-as-betting approaches for pure-exploration bandit problems. We illustrate the practical benefits of PEAK using both synthetic and real-world HeartSteps datasets. Our experiments show that PEAK provides up to an 85\% reduction in the number of samples before stopping compared to existing stopping rules for pure-exploration bandit problems, and matches the performance of state-of-the-art sequential tests while improving upon computational complexity.
Related papers
- A kernel conditional two-sample test [5.503626337185689]
We transform confidence bounds of a learning method into a conditional two-sample test.<n>We introduce bootstrapping schemes to avoid tuning inaccessible parameters.<n>Our results establish a comprehensive foundation for conditional two-sample testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T12:53:13Z) - Conditional Testing based on Localized Conformal p-values [5.6779147365057305]
We define the localized conformal p-values by inverting prediction intervals and prove their theoretical properties.
These defined p-values are then applied to several conditional testing problems to illustrate their practicality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T11:30:14Z) - Federated Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing with Differential Privacy Constraints: Optimal Rates and Adaptive Tests [5.3595271893779906]
Federated learning has attracted significant recent attention due to its applicability across a wide range of settings where data is collected and analyzed across disparate locations.
We study federated nonparametric goodness-of-fit testing in the white-noise-with-drift model under distributed differential privacy (DP) constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T19:25:19Z) - Robust Kernel Hypothesis Testing under Data Corruption [6.430258446597413]
We propose two general methods for constructing robust permutation tests under data corruption.
We prove their consistency in power under minimal conditions.
This contributes to the practical deployment of hypothesis tests for real-world applications with potential adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T10:23:16Z) - Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [55.17761802332469]
Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample.
Prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications.
We propose an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-18T05:49:45Z) - An Efficient Rehearsal Scheme for Catastrophic Forgetting Mitigation during Multi-stage Fine-tuning [55.467047686093025]
A common approach to alleviate such forgetting is to rehearse samples from prior tasks during fine-tuning.
We propose a sampling scheme, textttbf mix-cd, that prioritizes rehearsal of collateral damage'' samples.
Our approach is computationally efficient, easy to implement, and outperforms several leading continual learning methods in compute-constrained settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T22:32:12Z) - Deep anytime-valid hypothesis testing [29.273915933729057]
We propose a general framework for constructing powerful, sequential hypothesis tests for nonparametric testing problems.
We develop a principled approach of leveraging the representation capability of machine learning models within the testing-by-betting framework.
Empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that tests instantiated using our general framework are competitive against specialized baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T09:46:19Z) - Sequential Kernelized Independence Testing [101.22966794822084]
We design sequential kernelized independence tests inspired by kernelized dependence measures.
We demonstrate the power of our approaches on both simulated and real data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-14T18:08:42Z) - Asymptotically Unbiased Instance-wise Regularized Partial AUC
Optimization: Theory and Algorithm [101.44676036551537]
One-way Partial AUC (OPAUC) and Two-way Partial AUC (TPAUC) measures the average performance of a binary classifier.
Most of the existing methods could only optimize PAUC approximately, leading to inevitable biases that are not controllable.
We present a simpler reformulation of the PAUC problem via distributional robust optimization AUC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-08T08:26:22Z) - Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation: Instance-aware BN and
Prediction-balanced Memory [58.72445309519892]
We present a new test-time adaptation scheme that is robust against non-i.i.d. test data streams.
Our novelty is mainly two-fold: (a) Instance-Aware Batch Normalization (IABN) that corrects normalization for out-of-distribution samples, and (b) Prediction-balanced Reservoir Sampling (PBRS) that simulates i.i.d. data stream from non-i.i.d. stream in a class-balanced manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-10T03:05:46Z) - Efficient Aggregated Kernel Tests using Incomplete $U$-statistics [22.251118308736327]
Three proposed tests aggregate over several kernel bandwidths to detect departures from the null on various scales.
We show that our proposed linear-time aggregated tests obtain higher power than current state-of-the-art linear-time kernel tests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-18T12:30:06Z) - Sequential Permutation Testing of Random Forest Variable Importance
Measures [68.8204255655161]
It is proposed here to use sequential permutation tests and sequential p-value estimation to reduce the high computational costs associated with conventional permutation tests.
The results of simulation studies confirm that the theoretical properties of the sequential tests apply.
The numerical stability of the methods is investigated in two additional application studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-02T20:16:50Z) - AdaPT-GMM: Powerful and robust covariate-assisted multiple testing [0.7614628596146599]
We propose a new empirical Bayes method for co-assisted multiple testing with false discovery rate (FDR) control.
Our method refines the adaptive p-value thresholding (AdaPT) procedure by generalizing its masking scheme.
We show in extensive simulations and real data examples that our new method, which we call AdaPT-GMM, consistently delivers high power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-30T05:06:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.