AdaPT-GMM: Powerful and robust covariate-assisted multiple testing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15812v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 05:06:18 GMT
• Title: AdaPT-GMM: Powerful and robust covariate-assisted multiple testing
• Authors: Patrick Chao, William Fithian
• Abstract summary: We propose a new empirical Bayes method for co-assisted multiple testing with false discovery rate (FDR) control. Our method refines the adaptive p-value thresholding (AdaPT) procedure by generalizing its masking scheme. We show in extensive simulations and real data examples that our new method, which we call AdaPT-GMM, consistently delivers high power.
• Score: 0.7614628596146599
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We propose a new empirical Bayes method for covariate-assisted multiple testing with false discovery rate (FDR) control, where we model the local false discovery rate for each hypothesis as a function of both its covariates and p-value. Our method refines the adaptive p-value thresholding (AdaPT) procedure by generalizing its masking scheme to reduce the bias and variance of its false discovery proportion estimator, improving the power when the rejection set is small or some null p-values concentrate near 1. We also introduce a Gaussian mixture model for the conditional distribution of the test statistics given covariates, modeling the mixing proportions with a generic user-specified classifier, which we implement using a two-layer neural network. Like AdaPT, our method provably controls the FDR in finite samples even if the classifier or the Gaussian mixture model is misspecified. We show in extensive simulations and real data examples that our new method, which we call AdaPT-GMM, consistently delivers high power relative to competing state-of-the-art methods. In particular, it performs well in scenarios where AdaPT is underpowered, and is especially well-suited for testing composite null hypothesis, such as whether the effect size exceeds a practical significance threshold.

Related papers

• CKD: Contrastive Knowledge Distillation from A Sample-wise Perspective [48.99488315273868]
  We present a contrastive knowledge distillation approach, which can be formulated as a sample-wise alignment problem with intra- and inter-sample constraints. Our method minimizes logit differences within the same sample by considering their numerical values. We conduct comprehensive experiments on three datasets including CIFAR-100, ImageNet-1K, and MS COCO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T11:52:40Z)
• A Semi-Bayesian Nonparametric Estimator of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy Measure: Applications in Goodness-of-Fit Testing and Generative Adversarial Networks [3.623570119514559]
  We propose a semi-Bayesian nonparametric (semi-BNP) procedure for the goodness-of-fit (GOF) test. Our method introduces a novel Bayesian estimator for the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) measure. We demonstrate that our proposed test outperforms frequentist MMD-based methods by achieving a lower false rejection and acceptance rate of the null hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T10:36:21Z)
• Convergence of uncertainty estimates in Ensemble and Bayesian sparse model discovery [4.446017969073817]
  We show empirical success in terms of accuracy and robustness to noise with bootstrapping-based sequential thresholding least-squares estimator. We show that this bootstrapping-based ensembling technique can perform a provably correct variable selection procedure with an exponential convergence rate of the error rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T04:07:59Z)
• Learning Multivariate CDFs and Copulas using Tensor Factorization [39.24470798045442]
  Learning the multivariate distribution of data is a core challenge in statistics and machine learning. In this work, we aim to learn multivariate cumulative distribution functions (CDFs), as they can handle mixed random variables. We show that any grid sampled version of a joint CDF of mixed random variables admits a universal representation as a naive Bayes model. We demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed model in several synthetic and real datasets and applications including regression, sampling and data imputation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T16:18:46Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)
• Error-based Knockoffs Inference for Controlled Feature Selection [49.99321384855201]
  We propose an error-based knockoff inference method by integrating the knockoff features, the error-based feature importance statistics, and the stepdown procedure together. The proposed inference procedure does not require specifying a regression model and can handle feature selection with theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T01:55:59Z)
• Learning generative models for valid knockoffs using novel multivariate-rank based statistics [12.528602250193206]
  Rank energy (RE) is derived using theoretical results characterizing the optimal maps in the Monge's Optimal Transport (OT) problem. We propose a variant of the RE, dubbed as soft rank energy (sRE), and its kernel variant called as soft rank maximum mean discrepancy (sRMMD) We then use sRMMD to generate deep knockoffs and show via extensive evaluation that it is a novel and effective method to produce valid knockoffs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T18:51:19Z)
• A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptation [82.01909503235385]
  A default assumption in many machine learning scenarios is that the training and test samples are drawn from the same probability distribution. We propose a novel one-step approach that jointly learns the predictive model and the associated weights in one optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T11:35:47Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Lower bounds in multiple testing: A framework based on derandomized proxies [107.69746750639584]
  This paper introduces an analysis strategy based on derandomization, illustrated by applications to various concrete models. We provide numerical simulations of some of these lower bounds, and show a close relation to the actual performance of the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T19:59:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.