Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward Hacking
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06627v3
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:39:09 GMT
- Title: Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward Hacking
- Authors: Alexander Pan, Erik Jones, Meena Jagadeesan, Jacob Steinhardt,
- Abstract summary: We show that feedback loops can cause in-context reward hacking (ICRH)
We identify and study two processes that lead to ICRH: output-refinement and policy-refinement.
As AI development accelerates, the effects of feedback loops will proliferate.
- Score: 78.9830398771605
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Language models influence the external world: they query APIs that read and write to web pages, generate content that shapes human behavior, and run system commands as autonomous agents. These interactions form feedback loops: LLM outputs affect the world, which in turn affect subsequent LLM outputs. In this work, we show that feedback loops can cause in-context reward hacking (ICRH), where the LLM at test-time optimizes a (potentially implicit) objective but creates negative side effects in the process. For example, consider an LLM agent deployed to increase Twitter engagement; the LLM may retrieve its previous tweets into the context window and make them more controversial, increasing engagement but also toxicity. We identify and study two processes that lead to ICRH: output-refinement and policy-refinement. For these processes, evaluations on static datasets are insufficient -- they miss the feedback effects and thus cannot capture the most harmful behavior. In response, we provide three recommendations for evaluation to capture more instances of ICRH. As AI development accelerates, the effects of feedback loops will proliferate, increasing the need to understand their role in shaping LLM behavior.
Related papers
- GoEX: Perspectives and Designs Towards a Runtime for Autonomous LLM Applications [46.85306320942487]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving to actively engage with tools and performing actions on real-world applications and services.
Today, humans verify the correctness and appropriateness of the LLM-generated outputs before putting them into real-world execution.
This poses significant challenges as code comprehension is well known to be notoriously difficult.
In this paper, we study how humans can efficiently collaborate with, delegate to, and supervise autonomous LLMs in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T11:17:33Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - Prompt Perturbation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation based Large Language Models [9.688626139309013]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation is considered as a means to improve the trustworthiness of text generation from large language models.
In this work, we find that the insertion of even a short prefix to the prompt leads to the generation of outputs far away from factually correct answers.
We introduce a novel optimization technique called Gradient Guided Prompt Perturbation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-11T12:25:41Z) - Machine Unlearning in Large Language Models [8.14992136443131]
This paper introduces a novel machine unlearning framework into large language models.
Our objectives are to make LLMs not produce harmful, hallucinatory, or privacy-compromising responses.
Experimental results show that our approach effectively meets unlearning objectives without substantially compromising model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-03T05:14:56Z) - LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback [65.84061725174269]
Recent large language models (LLM) are leveraging human feedback to improve their generation quality.
We propose LLMRefine, an inference time optimization method to refine LLM's output.
We conduct experiments on three text generation tasks, including machine translation, long-form question answering (QA), and topical summarization.
LLMRefine consistently outperforms all baseline approaches, achieving improvements up to 1.7 MetricX points on translation tasks, 8.1 ROUGE-L on ASQA, 2.2 ROUGE-L on topical summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T19:52:11Z) - CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive
Critiquing [139.77117915309023]
CRITIC allows large language models to validate and amend their own outputs in a manner similar to human interaction with tools.
Comprehensive evaluations involving free-form question answering, mathematical program synthesis, and toxicity reduction demonstrate that CRITIC consistently enhances the performance of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T15:19:44Z) - Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with
External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks.
This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z) - Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting [114.84930073977672]
We introduce Directional Stimulus Prompting, a novel framework for guiding black-box large language models (LLMs) toward specific desired outputs.
Instead of directly adjusting LLMs, our method employs a small tunable policy model to generate an auxiliary directional stimulus prompt for each input instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T17:44:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.