A Methodology for Questionnaire Analysis: Insights through Cluster Analysis of an Investor Competition Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06759v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 19:44:29 GMT
• Title: A Methodology for Questionnaire Analysis: Insights through Cluster Analysis of an Investor Competition Data
• Authors: Carlos Henrique Q. Forster, Paulo Andr\'e Lima de Castro and Andrei Ramalho
• Abstract summary: The questionnaire includes categorical questions, which are reduced to binary questions, 'yes' or 'no' The methodology reduces dimensionality by grouping questions and participants with similar responses using clustering analysis. When crossing with financial data, additional insights were revealed related to the recognized clusters.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we propose a methodology for the analysis of questionnaire data along with its application on discovering insights from investor data motivated by a day trading competition. The questionnaire includes categorical questions, which are reduced to binary questions, 'yes' or 'no'. The methodology reduces dimensionality by grouping questions and participants with similar responses using clustering analysis. Rule discovery was performed by using a conversion rate metric. Innovative visual representations were proposed to validate the cluster analysis and the relation discovery between questions. When crossing with financial data, additional insights were revealed related to the recognized clusters.

Related papers

• "I Never Said That": A dataset, taxonomy and baselines on response clarity classification [4.16330182801919]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy that frames the task of detecting and classifying response clarity. Our proposed two-level taxonomy addresses the clarity of a response in terms of the information provided for a given question. We combine ChatGPT and human annotators to collect, validate and annotate discrete QA pairs from political interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T20:15:06Z)
• AQuA -- Combining Experts' and Non-Experts' Views To Assess Deliberation Quality in Online Discussions Using LLMs [0.9737366359397255]
  AQuA is an additive score that calculates a unified deliberative quality score from multiple indices for each discussion post. We develop adapter models for 20 deliberative indices, and calculate correlation coefficients between experts' annotations and the perceived deliberativeness by non-experts to weigh the individual indices into a single deliberative score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T14:07:02Z)
• Prismatic: Interactive Multi-View Cluster Analysis of Concept Stocks [42.39389192863717]
  We propose Prismatic, a visual analytics system that integrates quantitative analysis of historical performance and qualitative analysis of business relational knowledge to cluster correlated businesses interactively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T06:47:30Z)
• Asking Multimodal Clarifying Questions in Mixed-Initiative Conversational Search [89.1772985740272]
  In mixed-initiative conversational search systems, clarifying questions are used to help users who struggle to express their intentions in a single query. We hypothesize that in scenarios where multimodal information is pertinent, the clarification process can be improved by using non-textual information. We collect a dataset named Melon that contains over 4k multimodal clarifying questions, enriched with over 14k images. Several analyses are conducted to understand the importance of multimodal contents during the query clarification phase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:04:01Z)
• Flexible categorization for auditing using formal concept analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory [55.878249096379804]
  We study different ways to categorize according to different extents of interest in different financial accounts. The framework developed in this paper provides a formal ground to obtain and study explainable categorizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T13:49:16Z)
• What should I Ask: A Knowledge-driven Approach for Follow-up Questions Generation in Conversational Surveys [63.51903260461746]
  We propose a novel task for knowledge-driven follow-up question generation in conversational surveys. We constructed a new human-annotated dataset of human-written follow-up questions with dialogue history and labeled knowledge. We then propose a two-staged knowledge-driven model for the task, which generates informative and coherent follow-up questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T00:57:33Z)
• Question-Answer Sentence Graph for Joint Modeling Answer Selection [122.29142965960138]
  We train and integrate state-of-the-art (SOTA) models for computing scores between question-question, question-answer, and answer-answer pairs. Online inference is then performed to solve the AS2 task on unseen queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T05:59:53Z)
• A review of systematic selection of clustering algorithms and their evaluation [0.0]
  This paper aims to identify a systematic selection logic for clustering algorithms and corresponding validation concepts. The goal is to enable potential users to choose an algorithm that fits best to their needs and the properties of their underlying data clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T07:01:46Z)
• Topology-based Clusterwise Regression for User Segmentation and Demand Forecasting [63.78344280962136]
  Using a public and a novel proprietary data set of commercial data, this research shows that the proposed system enables analysts to both cluster their user base and plan demand at a granular level. This work seeks to introduce TDA-based clustering of time series and clusterwise regression with matrix factorization methods as viable tools for the practitioner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T12:10:10Z)
• Guided Transformer: Leveraging Multiple External Sources for Representation Learning in Conversational Search [36.64582291809485]
  Asking clarifying questions in response to ambiguous or faceted queries has been recognized as a useful technique for various information retrieval systems. In this paper, we enrich the representations learned by Transformer networks using a novel attention mechanism from external information sources. Our experiments use a public dataset for search clarification and demonstrate significant improvements compared to competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T03:24:53Z)
• A Revised Generative Evaluation of Visual Dialogue [80.17353102854405]
  We propose a revised evaluation scheme for the VisDial dataset. We measure consensus between answers generated by the model and a set of relevant answers. We release these sets and code for the revised evaluation scheme as DenseVisDial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T13:26:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.