Towards an Understanding of Stepwise Inference in Transformers: A Synthetic Graph Navigation Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07757v1
• Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:25:47 GMT
• Title: Towards an Understanding of Stepwise Inference in Transformers: A Synthetic Graph Navigation Model
• Authors: Mikail Khona, Maya Okawa, Jan Hula, Rahul Ramesh, Kento Nishi, Robert Dick, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Hidenori Tanaka
• Abstract summary: We propose to study autoregressive Transformer models on a synthetic task that embodies the multi-step nature of problems where stepwise inference is generally most useful. Despite is simplicity, we find we can empirically reproduce and analyze several phenomena observed at scale.
• Score: 19.826983068662106
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Stepwise inference protocols, such as scratchpads and chain-of-thought, help language models solve complex problems by decomposing them into a sequence of simpler subproblems. Despite the significant gain in performance achieved via these protocols, the underlying mechanisms of stepwise inference have remained elusive. To address this, we propose to study autoregressive Transformer models on a synthetic task that embodies the multi-step nature of problems where stepwise inference is generally most useful. Specifically, we define a graph navigation problem wherein a model is tasked with traversing a path from a start to a goal node on the graph. Despite is simplicity, we find we can empirically reproduce and analyze several phenomena observed at scale: (i) the stepwise inference reasoning gap, the cause of which we find in the structure of the training data; (ii) a diversity-accuracy tradeoff in model generations as sampling temperature varies; (iii) a simplicity bias in the model's output; and (iv) compositional generalization and a primacy bias with in-context exemplars. Overall, our work introduces a grounded, synthetic framework for studying stepwise inference and offers mechanistic hypotheses that can lay the foundation for a deeper understanding of this phenomenon.

Related papers

• Deep Learning Through A Telescoping Lens: A Simple Model Provides Empirical Insights On Grokking, Gradient Boosting & Beyond [61.18736646013446]
  In pursuit of a deeper understanding of its surprising behaviors, we investigate the utility of a simple yet accurate model of a trained neural network. Across three case studies, we illustrate how it can be applied to derive new empirical insights on a diverse range of prominent phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T22:54:34Z)
• What Improves the Generalization of Graph Transformers? A Theoretical Dive into the Self-attention and Positional Encoding [67.59552859593985]
  Graph Transformers, which incorporate self-attention and positional encoding, have emerged as a powerful architecture for various graph learning tasks. This paper introduces first theoretical investigation of a shallow Graph Transformer for semi-supervised classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T05:30:16Z)
• FiP: a Fixed-Point Approach for Causal Generative Modeling [20.88890689294816]
  We propose a new and equivalent formalism that does not require DAGs to describe fixed-point problems on the causally ordered variables. We show three important cases where they can be uniquely recovered given the topological ordering (TO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T12:29:05Z)
• Information theory for data-driven model reduction in physics and biology [0.0]
  We develop a systematic approach based on the information bottleneck to identify the relevant variables. We show that in the limit of high compression, the relevant variables are directly determined by the slowest-decaying eigenfunctions. It provides a firm foundation to construct interpretable deep learning tools that perform model reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:39:05Z)
• Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning [72.84105256353801]
  Learning causal structure poses a search problem that typically involves evaluating structures using a score or independence test. We train a variational inference model to predict the causal structure from observational/interventional data. Our models exhibit robust generalization capabilities under substantial distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:37:08Z)
• Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation Perspective [72.55093886515824]
  We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables. We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph. Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z)
• A Scaling Law for Synthetic-to-Real Transfer: A Measure of Pre-Training [52.93808218720784]
  Synthetic-to-real transfer learning is a framework in which we pre-train models with synthetically generated images and ground-truth annotations for real tasks. Although synthetic images overcome the data scarcity issue, it remains unclear how the fine-tuning performance scales with pre-trained models. We observe a simple and general scaling law that consistently describes learning curves in various tasks, models, and complexities of synthesized pre-training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-25T02:29:28Z)
• A Meta Learning Approach to Discerning Causal Graph Structure [1.52292571922932]
  We explore the usage of meta-learning to derive the causal direction between variables by optimizing over a measure of distribution simplicity. We incorporate a graph representation which includes latent variables and allows for more generalizability and graph structure expression. Our model is able to learn causal direction indicators for complex graph structures despite effects of latent confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T22:44:44Z)
• Why Adversarial Interaction Creates Non-Homogeneous Patterns: A Pseudo-Reaction-Diffusion Model for Turing Instability [10.933825676518195]
  We observe Turing-like patterns in a system of neurons with adversarial interaction. We present a pseudo-reaction-diffusion model to explain the mechanism that may underlie these phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T16:09:22Z)
• Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervision [57.14468881854616]
  We propose an auxiliary training objective that improves the generalization capabilities of neural networks. We use pairs of minimally-different examples with different labels, a.k.a counterfactual or contrasting examples, which provide a signal indicative of the underlying causal structure of the task. Models trained with this technique demonstrate improved performance on out-of-distribution test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T02:47:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.