When is Tree Search Useful for LLM Planning? It Depends on the Discriminator

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10890v2
• Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 14:55:40 GMT
• Title: When is Tree Search Useful for LLM Planning? It Depends on the Discriminator
• Authors: Ziru Chen, Michael White, Raymond Mooney, Ali Payani, Yu Su, Huan Sun,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) solve multi-step problems under a language agent framework with three components: a generator, a discriminator, and a planning method. We present a comprehensive analysis of how discrimination accuracy affects the overall performance of agents when using advanced planning methods.
• Score: 15.75807429396126
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we examine how large language models (LLMs) solve multi-step problems under a language agent framework with three components: a generator, a discriminator, and a planning method. We investigate the practical utility of two advanced planning methods, iterative correction and tree search. We present a comprehensive analysis of how discrimination accuracy affects the overall performance of agents when using these two methods or a simpler method, re-ranking. Experiments on two tasks, text-to-SQL parsing and mathematical reasoning, show that: (1) advanced planning methods demand discriminators with at least 90% accuracy to achieve significant improvements over re-ranking; (2) current LLMs' discrimination abilities have not met the needs of advanced planning methods to achieve such improvements; (3) with LLM-based discriminators, advanced planning methods may not adequately balance accuracy and efficiency. For example, compared to the other two methods, tree search is at least 10--20 times slower but leads to negligible performance gains, which hinders its real-world applications. Code and data are available at https://github.com/OSU-NLP-Group/llm-planning-eval.

Related papers

• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
  MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models. It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths. It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z)
• Prompt Optimization via Adversarial In-Context Learning [51.18075178593142]
  adv-ICL is implemented as a two-player game between a generator and a discriminator. The generator tries to generate realistic enough output to fool the discriminator. We show that adv-ICL results in significant improvements over state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T09:44:45Z)
• Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models [63.06270302774049]
  Tree-Planner reframes task planning with Large Language Models into three distinct phases. Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:59:50Z)
• Alphazero-like Tree-Search can Guide Large Language Model Decoding and Training [37.79247073276239]
  Recent works like Tree-of-Thought (ToT) and Reasoning via Planning (RAP) aim to augment the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We present an AlphaZero-like tree-search learning framework for LLMs (termed TS-LLM) We show how tree-search with a learned value function can guide LLM decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T12:20:19Z)
• Tree-of-Mixed-Thought: Combining Fast and Slow Thinking for Multi-hop Visual Reasoning [16.495754104540605]
  Large language models (LLMs) can generate code-like plans for complex inference tasks such as visual reasoning. We propose a hierarchical plan-searching algorithm that integrates the one-stop reasoning (fast) and the Tree-of-thought (slow)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T16:21:40Z)
• SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
  We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer. We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z)
• LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Models [27.318186938382233]
  This study focuses on using large language models (LLMs) as a planner for embodied agents. We propose a novel method, LLM-Planner, that harnesses the power of large language models to do few-shot planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T05:46:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.