Exploring the Impact of Table-to-Text Methods on Augmenting LLM-based Question Answering with Domain Hybrid Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12869v2
• Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:00:57 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Impact of Table-to-Text Methods on Augmenting LLM-based Question Answering with Domain Hybrid Data
• Authors: Dehai Min, Nan Hu, Rihui Jin, Nuo Lin, Jiaoyan Chen, Yongrui Chen, Yu Li, Guilin Qi, Yun Li, Nijun Li, Qianren Wang,
• Abstract summary: Table-to-Text Generation is a promising solution by facilitating the transformation of hybrid data into a uniformly text-formatted corpus. There is currently no comparative analysis on how corpora generated by different table-to-text methods affect the performance of QA systems. In this paper, we innovatively integrate table-to-text generation into the framework of enhancing LLM-based QA systems with domain hybrid data.
• Score: 29.07028542633284
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) for Question Answering (QA) with domain specific data has attracted wide attention. However, domain data often exists in a hybrid format, including text and semi-structured tables, posing challenges for the seamless integration of information. Table-to-Text Generation is a promising solution by facilitating the transformation of hybrid data into a uniformly text-formatted corpus. Although this technique has been widely studied by the NLP community, there is currently no comparative analysis on how corpora generated by different table-to-text methods affect the performance of QA systems. In this paper, we address this research gap in two steps. First, we innovatively integrate table-to-text generation into the framework of enhancing LLM-based QA systems with domain hybrid data. Then, we utilize this framework in real-world industrial data to conduct extensive experiments on two types of QA systems (DSFT and RAG frameworks) with four representative methods: Markdown format, Template serialization, TPLM-based method, and LLM-based method. Based on the experimental results, we draw some empirical findings and explore the underlying reasons behind the success of some methods. We hope the findings of this work will provide a valuable reference for the academic and industrial communities in developing robust QA systems.

Related papers

• FedMLLM: Federated Fine-tuning MLLM on Multimodal Heterogeneity Data [64.50893177169996]
  Fine-tuning Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with Federated Learning (FL) allows for expanding the training data scope by including private data sources. We introduce a benchmark for evaluating various downstream tasks in the federated fine-tuning of MLLMs within multimodal heterogeneous scenarios. We develop a general FedMLLM framework that integrates four representative FL methods alongside two modality-agnostic strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T04:09:23Z)
• Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
  We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets. The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method. The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z)
• From Natural Language to SQL: Review of LLM-based Text-to-SQL Systems [1.1060425537315088]
  This survey provides a comprehensive study of the evolution of LLM-based text-to-sql systems. We discuss benchmarks, evaluation methods and evaluation metrics. We highlight key challenges such as efficiency, model privacy, and data privacy with perspectives toward their development and improvements in potential areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T20:46:25Z)
• Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering [9.86691461253151]
  We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of large language models (LLMs) Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. We present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:12:44Z)
• Harnessing Multi-Role Capabilities of Large Language Models for Open-Domain Question Answering [40.2758450304531]
  Open-domain question answering (ODQA) has emerged as a pivotal research spotlight in information systems. We propose a framework that formulates the ODQA process into three basic steps: query expansion, document selection, and answer generation. We introduce a novel prompt optimization algorithm to refine role-playing prompts and steer LLMs to produce higher-quality evidence and answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T11:09:13Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)
• How to Bridge the Gap between Modalities: A Comprehensive Survey on Multimodal Large Language Model [12.890344377484759]
  This review paper explores Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) MLLMs integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 to handle multimodal data such as text and vision. Choosing the appropriate modality alignment method is crucial, as improper methods might require more parameters with limited performance improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T09:51:24Z)
• DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
• MMHQA-ICL: Multimodal In-context Learning for Hybrid Question Answering over Text, Tables and Images [24.17147521556083]
  In-context learning has become the most popular way to solve QA problems. We propose MMHQA-ICL framework for addressing this problems. We are the first to use end-to-end prompting method for this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T13:35:01Z)
• Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation [76.76046657162306]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for Text-to- task. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a new paradigm for Text-to- task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T14:59:54Z)
• Mixed-modality Representation Learning and Pre-training for Joint Table-and-Text Retrieval in OpenQA [85.17249272519626]
  An optimized OpenQA Table-Text Retriever (OTTeR) is proposed. We conduct retrieval-centric mixed-modality synthetic pre-training. OTTeR substantially improves the performance of table-and-text retrieval on the OTT-QA dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T07:04:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.