Hallucinations or Attention Misdirection? The Path to Strategic Value Extraction in Business Using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14002v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:40:24 GMT
• Title: Hallucinations or Attention Misdirection? The Path to Strategic Value Extraction in Business Using Large Language Models
• Authors: Aline Ioste
• Abstract summary: This paper defines attention misdirection rather than true hallucinations. This paper highlights the best practices of the PGI, Persona, Grouping, and Intelligence, method.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models with transformer architecture have revolutionized the domain of text generation, setting unprecedented benchmarks. Despite their impressive capabilities, LLMs have been criticized for generating outcomes that deviate from factual accuracy or display logical inconsistencies, phenomena commonly referred to as hallucinations. This term, however, has often been misapplied to any results deviating from the instructor's expectations, which this paper defines as attention misdirection rather than true hallucinations. Understanding the distinction between hallucinations and attention misdirection becomes increasingly relevant in business contexts, where the ramifications of such errors can significantly impact the value extraction from these inherently pre-trained models. This paper highlights the best practices of the PGI, Persona, Grouping, and Intelligence, method, a strategic framework that achieved a remarkable error rate of only 3,15 percent across 4,000 responses generated by GPT in response to a real business challenge. It emphasizes that by equipping experimentation with knowledge, businesses can unlock opportunities for innovation through the use of these natively pre-trained models. This reinforces the notion that strategic application grounded in a skilled team can maximize the benefits of emergent technologies such as the LLMs.

Related papers

• A Debate-Driven Experiment on LLM Hallucinations and Accuracy [7.821303946741665]
  This study investigates the phenomenon of hallucination in large language models (LLMs) Multiple instances of GPT-4o-Mini models engage in a debate-like interaction prompted with questions from the TruthfulQA dataset. One model is deliberately instructed to generate plausible but false answers while the other models are asked to respond truthfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T11:41:27Z)
• Serial Position Effects of Large Language Models [29.111115148808196]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in zero-shot learning applications. This represents a significant departure from traditional machine learning approaches. Previous research has indicated that LLMs may exhibit serial position effects, such as primacy and recency biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T02:02:52Z)
• Understanding Privacy Risks of Embeddings Induced by Large Language Models [75.96257812857554]
  Large language models show early signs of artificial general intelligence but struggle with hallucinations. One promising solution is to store external knowledge as embeddings, aiding LLMs in retrieval-augmented generation. Recent studies experimentally showed that the original text can be partially reconstructed from text embeddings by pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T13:10:48Z)
• Towards a Holistic Evaluation of LLMs on Factual Knowledge Recall [31.45796499298925]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance on a variety of NLP tasks. We focus on assessing LLMs' ability to recall factual knowledge learned from pretraining. We benchmark 31 models from 10 model families and provide a holistic assessment of their strengths and weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T19:40:01Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing. Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image. To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• Zero-Resource Hallucination Prevention for Large Language Models [45.4155729393135]
  "Hallucination" refers to instances where large language models (LLMs) generate factually inaccurate or ungrounded information. We introduce a novel pre-language self-evaluation technique, referred to as SELF-FAMILIARITY, which focuses on evaluating the model's familiarity with the concepts present in the input instruction. We validate SELF-FAMILIARITY across four different large language models, demonstrating consistently superior performance compared to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T01:57:36Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)
• Confounder Identification-free Causal Visual Feature Learning [84.28462256571822]
  We propose a novel Confounder Identification-free Causal Visual Feature Learning (CICF) method, which obviates the need for identifying confounders. CICF models the interventions among different samples based on front-door criterion, and then approximates the global-scope intervening effect upon the instance-level interventions. We uncover the relation between CICF and the popular meta-learning strategy MAML, and provide an interpretation of why MAML works from the theoretical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T10:57:47Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Data Augmentation Approach for Natural Language Understanding and Generation [53.8171136907856]
  We introduce a set of simple yet effective data augmentation strategies dubbed cutoff. cutoff relies on sampling consistency and thus adds little computational overhead. cutoff consistently outperforms adversarial training and achieves state-of-the-art results on the IWSLT2014 German-English dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T07:08:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.