How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descent
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14735v1
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:47:03 GMT
- Title: How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descent
- Authors: Eshaan Nichani, Alex Damian, Jason D. Lee
- Abstract summary: Self-attention allows transformers to encode causal structure.
We introduce an in-context learning task that requires learning latent causal structure.
We show that transformers trained on our in-context learning task are able to recover a wide variety of causal structures.
- Score: 49.808194368781095
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The incredible success of transformers on sequence modeling tasks can be
largely attributed to the self-attention mechanism, which allows information to
be transferred between different parts of a sequence. Self-attention allows
transformers to encode causal structure which makes them particularly suitable
for sequence modeling. However, the process by which transformers learn such
causal structure via gradient-based training algorithms remains poorly
understood. To better understand this process, we introduce an in-context
learning task that requires learning latent causal structure. We prove that
gradient descent on a simplified two-layer transformer learns to solve this
task by encoding the latent causal graph in the first attention layer. The key
insight of our proof is that the gradient of the attention matrix encodes the
mutual information between tokens. As a consequence of the data processing
inequality, the largest entries of this gradient correspond to edges in the
latent causal graph. As a special case, when the sequences are generated from
in-context Markov chains, we prove that transformers learn an induction head
(Olsson et al., 2022). We confirm our theoretical findings by showing that
transformers trained on our in-context learning task are able to recover a wide
variety of causal structures.
Related papers
- Local to Global: Learning Dynamics and Effect of Initialization for Transformers [20.02103237675619]
We focus on first-order Markov chains and single-layer transformers.
We prove that transformer parameters trained on next-token prediction loss can either converge to global or local minima.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T08:57:41Z) - When can transformers reason with abstract symbols? [25.63285482210457]
We prove that for any relational reasoning task in a large family of tasks, transformers learn the abstract relations and generalize to the test set.
This is in contrast to classical fully-connected networks, which we prove fail to learn to reason.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-15T06:45:38Z) - How Do Transformers Learn Topic Structure: Towards a Mechanistic
Understanding [56.222097640468306]
We provide mechanistic understanding of how transformers learn "semantic structure"
We show, through a combination of mathematical analysis and experiments on Wikipedia data, that the embedding layer and the self-attention layer encode the topical structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T21:42:17Z) - Are More Layers Beneficial to Graph Transformers? [97.05661983225603]
Current graph transformers suffer from the bottleneck of improving performance by increasing depth.
Deep graph transformers are limited by the vanishing capacity of global attention.
We propose a novel graph transformer model named DeepGraph that explicitly employs substructure tokens in the encoded representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-01T15:22:40Z) - What Makes for Good Tokenizers in Vision Transformer? [62.44987486771936]
transformers are capable of extracting their pairwise relationships using self-attention.
What makes for a good tokenizer has not been well understood in computer vision.
Modulation across Tokens (MoTo) incorporates inter-token modeling capability through normalization.
Regularization objective TokenProp is embraced in the standard training regime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T15:51:43Z) - Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent [58.24152335931036]
Training Transformers on auto-regressive objectives is closely related to gradient-based meta-learning formulations.
We show how trained Transformers become mesa-optimizers i.e. learn models by gradient descent in their forward pass.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-15T09:21:21Z) - Unveiling Transformers with LEGO: a synthetic reasoning task [23.535488809197787]
We study how the transformer architecture learns to follow a chain of reasoning.
In some data regime the trained transformer finds "shortcut" solutions to follow the chain of reasoning.
We find that one can prevent such shortcut with appropriate architecture modification or careful data preparation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-09T06:30:17Z) - Signal Propagation in Transformers: Theoretical Perspectives and the
Role of Rank Collapse [11.486545294602697]
We shed new light on the causes and effects of rank collapse in Transformers.
We show that rank collapse of the tokens' representations hinders training by causing the gradients of the queries and keys to vanish.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T09:07:24Z) - On the Power of Saturated Transformers: A View from Circuit Complexity [87.20342701232869]
We show that saturated transformers transcend the limitations of hard-attention transformers.
The jump from hard to saturated attention can be understood as increasing the transformer's effective circuit depth by a factor of $O(log n)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-30T17:09:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.