How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descent

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14735v2
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:45:37 GMT
• Title: How Transformers Learn Causal Structure with Gradient Descent
• Authors: Eshaan Nichani, Alex Damian, Jason D. Lee,
• Abstract summary: Self-attention allows transformers to encode causal structure. We introduce an in-context learning task that requires learning latent causal structure. We show that transformers trained on our in-context learning task are able to recover a wide variety of causal structures.
• Score: 44.31729147722701
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The incredible success of transformers on sequence modeling tasks can be largely attributed to the self-attention mechanism, which allows information to be transferred between different parts of a sequence. Self-attention allows transformers to encode causal structure which makes them particularly suitable for sequence modeling. However, the process by which transformers learn such causal structure via gradient-based training algorithms remains poorly understood. To better understand this process, we introduce an in-context learning task that requires learning latent causal structure. We prove that gradient descent on a simplified two-layer transformer learns to solve this task by encoding the latent causal graph in the first attention layer. The key insight of our proof is that the gradient of the attention matrix encodes the mutual information between tokens. As a consequence of the data processing inequality, the largest entries of this gradient correspond to edges in the latent causal graph. As a special case, when the sequences are generated from in-context Markov chains, we prove that transformers learn an induction head (Olsson et al., 2022). We confirm our theoretical findings by showing that transformers trained on our in-context learning task are able to recover a wide variety of causal structures.

Related papers

• One-Layer Transformer Provably Learns One-Nearest Neighbor In Context [48.4979348643494]
  We study the capability of one-layer transformers learning the one-nearest neighbor rule. A single softmax attention layer can successfully learn to behave like a one-nearest neighbor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T16:12:42Z)
• On-Chip Learning via Transformer In-Context Learning [0.9353041869660692]
  Self-attention mechanism requires transferring prior token projections from the main memory at each time step. We present a neuromorphic decoder-only transformer model that utilizes an on-chip plasticity processor to compute self-attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T10:54:09Z)
• Can Looped Transformers Learn to Implement Multi-step Gradient Descent for In-context Learning? [69.4145579827826]
  We show a fast flow on the regression loss despite the gradient non-ity algorithms for our convergence landscape. This is the first theoretical analysis for multi-layer Transformer in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T18:29:05Z)
• Unveiling Induction Heads: Provable Training Dynamics and Feature Learning in Transformers [54.20763128054692]
  We study how a two-attention-layer transformer is trained to perform ICL on $n$-gram Markov chain data. We prove that the gradient flow with respect to a cross-entropy ICL loss converges to a limiting model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T18:10:26Z)
• Are More Layers Beneficial to Graph Transformers? [97.05661983225603]
  Current graph transformers suffer from the bottleneck of improving performance by increasing depth. Deep graph transformers are limited by the vanishing capacity of global attention. We propose a novel graph transformer model named DeepGraph that explicitly employs substructure tokens in the encoded representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T15:22:40Z)
• Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent [58.24152335931036]
  Training Transformers on auto-regressive objectives is closely related to gradient-based meta-learning formulations. We show how trained Transformers become mesa-optimizers i.e. learn models by gradient descent in their forward pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T09:21:21Z)
• Unveiling Transformers with LEGO: a synthetic reasoning task [23.535488809197787]
  We study how the transformer architecture learns to follow a chain of reasoning. In some data regime the trained transformer finds "shortcut" solutions to follow the chain of reasoning. We find that one can prevent such shortcut with appropriate architecture modification or careful data preparation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T06:30:17Z)
• Signal Propagation in Transformers: Theoretical Perspectives and the Role of Rank Collapse [11.486545294602697]
  We shed new light on the causes and effects of rank collapse in Transformers. We show that rank collapse of the tokens' representations hinders training by causing the gradients of the queries and keys to vanish.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T09:07:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.