Statistical Agnostic Regression: a machine learning method to validate regression models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15213v2
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 07:26:48 GMT
- Title: Statistical Agnostic Regression: a machine learning method to validate regression models
- Authors: Juan M Gorriz, J. Ramirez, F. Segovia, F. J. Martinez-Murcia, C. Jiménez-Mesa, J. Suckling,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a method, named Statistical Agnostic Regression (SAR), for evaluating the statistical significance of an ML-based linear regression.
We define a threshold to establish that there is sufficient evidence with a probability of at least 1-eta to conclude that there is a linear relationship in the population between the explanatory (feature) and the response (label) variables.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Regression analysis is a central topic in statistical modeling, aiming to estimate the relationships between a dependent variable, commonly referred to as the response variable, and one or more independent variables, i.e., explanatory variables. Linear regression is by far the most popular method for performing this task in several fields of research, such as prediction, forecasting, or causal inference. Beyond various classical methods to solve linear regression problems, such as Ordinary Least Squares, Ridge, or Lasso regressions - which are often the foundation for more advanced machine learning (ML) techniques - the latter have been successfully applied in this scenario without a formal definition of statistical significance. At most, permutation or classical analyses based on empirical measures (e.g., residuals or accuracy) have been conducted to reflect the greater ability of ML estimations for detection. In this paper, we introduce a method, named Statistical Agnostic Regression (SAR), for evaluating the statistical significance of an ML-based linear regression based on concentration inequalities of the actual risk using the analysis of the worst case. To achieve this goal, similar to the classification problem, we define a threshold to establish that there is sufficient evidence with a probability of at least 1-eta to conclude that there is a linear relationship in the population between the explanatory (feature) and the response (label) variables. Simulations in only two dimensions demonstrate the ability of the proposed agnostic test to provide a similar analysis of variance given by the classical $F$ test for the slope parameter.
Related papers
- A Novel Approach in Solving Stochastic Generalized Linear Regression via
Nonconvex Programming [1.6874375111244329]
This paper considers a generalized linear regression model as a problem with chance constraints.
The results of the proposed algorithm were over 1 to 2 percent better than the ordinary logistic regression model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T16:45:51Z) - Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point.
Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z) - Errors-in-variables Fr\'echet Regression with Low-rank Covariate
Approximation [2.1756081703276]
Fr'echet regression has emerged as a promising approach for regression analysis involving non-Euclidean response variables.
Our proposed framework combines the concepts of global Fr'echet regression and principal component regression, aiming to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the regression estimator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T08:37:54Z) - Are Latent Factor Regression and Sparse Regression Adequate? [0.49416305961918056]
We provide theoretical guarantees for the estimation of our model under the existence of sub-Gaussian and heavy-tailed noises.
We propose the Factor-Adjusted de-Biased Test (FabTest) and a two-stage ANOVA type test respectively.
Numerical results illustrate the robustness and effectiveness of our model against latent factor regression and sparse linear regression models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-02T16:22:23Z) - Regression Bugs Are In Your Model! Measuring, Reducing and Analyzing
Regressions In NLP Model Updates [68.09049111171862]
This work focuses on quantifying, reducing and analyzing regression errors in the NLP model updates.
We formulate the regression-free model updates into a constrained optimization problem.
We empirically analyze how model ensemble reduces regression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T03:33:00Z) - Variable selection with missing data in both covariates and outcomes:
Imputation and machine learning [1.0333430439241666]
The missing data issue is ubiquitous in health studies.
Machine learning methods weaken parametric assumptions.
XGBoost and BART have the overall best performance across various settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-06T20:18:29Z) - Learning Probabilistic Ordinal Embeddings for Uncertainty-Aware
Regression [91.3373131262391]
Uncertainty is the only certainty there is.
Traditionally, the direct regression formulation is considered and the uncertainty is modeled by modifying the output space to a certain family of probabilistic distributions.
How to model the uncertainty within the present-day technologies for regression remains an open issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-25T06:56:09Z) - SLOE: A Faster Method for Statistical Inference in High-Dimensional
Logistic Regression [68.66245730450915]
We develop an improved method for debiasing predictions and estimating frequentist uncertainty for practical datasets.
Our main contribution is SLOE, an estimator of the signal strength with convergence guarantees that reduces the computation time of estimation and inference by orders of magnitude.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T17:48:56Z) - Flexible Model Aggregation for Quantile Regression [92.63075261170302]
Quantile regression is a fundamental problem in statistical learning motivated by a need to quantify uncertainty in predictions.
We investigate methods for aggregating any number of conditional quantile models.
All of the models we consider in this paper can be fit using modern deep learning toolkits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T23:21:16Z) - Two-step penalised logistic regression for multi-omic data with an
application to cardiometabolic syndrome [62.997667081978825]
We implement a two-step approach to multi-omic logistic regression in which variable selection is performed on each layer separately.
Our approach should be preferred if the goal is to select as many relevant predictors as possible.
Our proposed approach allows us to identify features that characterise cardiometabolic syndrome at the molecular level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-01T10:36:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.