GAOKAO-MM: A Chinese Human-Level Benchmark for Multimodal Models Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15745v2
• Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 15:28:30 GMT
• Title: GAOKAO-MM: A Chinese Human-Level Benchmark for Multimodal Models Evaluation
• Authors: Yi Zong, Xipeng Qiu,
• Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated great abilities in image perception and language understanding. We propose GAOKAO-MM, a multimodal benchmark based on the Chinese College Entrance Examination (GAOKAO) We evaluate 10 LVLMs and find that the accuracies of all of them are lower than 50%, with GPT-4-Vison (48.1%), Qwen-VL-Plus (41.2%) and Gemini-Pro-Vision (35.1%) ranking in the top three positions.
• Score: 55.2480439325792
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated great abilities in image perception and language understanding. However, existing multimodal benchmarks focus on primary perception abilities and commonsense knowledge which are insufficient to reflect the comprehensive capabilities of LVLMs. We propose GAOKAO-MM, a multimodal benchmark based on the Chinese College Entrance Examination (GAOKAO), comprising of 8 subjects and 12 types of images, such as diagrams, function graphs, maps and photos. GAOKAO-MM derives from native Chinese context and sets human-level requirements for the model's abilities, including perception, understanding, knowledge and reasoning. We evaluate 10 LVLMs and find that the accuracies of all of them are lower than 50%, with GPT-4-Vison (48.1%), Qwen-VL-Plus (41.2%) and Gemini-Pro-Vision (35.1%) ranking in the top three positions. The results of our multi-dimension analysis indicate that LVLMs have moderate distance towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and provide insights facilitating the development of multilingual LVLMs.

Related papers

• Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark [53.61633384281524]
  PolyMATH is a benchmark aimed at evaluating the general cognitive reasoning abilities of MLLMs. The best scores achieved on PolyMATH are 41%, 36%, and 27%, obtained by Claude-3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro respectively. A further fine-grained error analysis reveals that these models struggle to understand spatial relations and perform drawn-out, high-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T20:35:41Z)
• On Large Uni- and Multi-modal Models for Unsupervised Classification of Social Media Images: Nature's Contribution to People as a case study [1.7736307382785161]
  This work proposes, analyzes, and compares various approaches for mapping social media images into a number of predefined classes. As a case study, we consider the problem of understanding the interactions between humans and nature, also known as Nature's Contribution to People or Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) Our experiments show that the highest-performing approaches, with accuracy above 95%, still require the creation of a small labeled dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T23:04:55Z)
• AlignMMBench: Evaluating Chinese Multimodal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models [34.843603169616486]
  We introduce AlignMMBench, a comprehensive alignment benchmark for emerging Chinese Vision-Language Models (VLMs) This benchmark is meticulously curated from real-world scenarios and Chinese Internet sources, encompassing thirteen specific tasks across three categories, and includes both single-turn and multi-turn dialogue scenarios. To facilitate the evaluation pipeline, we propose CritiqueVLM, a rule-calibrated evaluator that exceeds GPT-4's evaluation ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:30:14Z)
• How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suites [114.22835695929682]
  InternVL 1.5 is an open-source multimodal large language model (MLLM) It bridges the capability gap between open-source and proprietary commercial models in multimodal understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T17:59:19Z)
• Finer: Investigating and Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Concept Recognition in Large Vision Language Models [57.95366341738857]
  In-depth analyses show that instruction-tuned LVLMs exhibit modality gap, showing discrepancy when given textual and visual inputs that correspond to the same concept. We propose a multiple attribute-centric evaluation benchmark, Finer, to evaluate LVLMs' fine-grained visual comprehension ability and provide significantly improved explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T05:43:51Z)
• LION : Empowering Multimodal Large Language Model with Dual-Level Visual Knowledge [58.82222646803248]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have endowed LLMs with the ability to perceive and understand multi-modal signals. Most of the existing MLLMs mainly adopt vision encoders pretrained on coarsely aligned image-text pairs, leading to insufficient extraction and reasoning of visual knowledge. We propose a dual-Level vIsual knedgeOwl eNhanced Multimodal Large Language Model (LION), which empowers the MLLM by injecting visual knowledge in two levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T15:56:44Z)
• CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese [133.70911295934746]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that covers various subjects, including natural science, social sciences, engineering, and humanities. CMMLU fills the gap in evaluating the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models within the Chinese context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T15:49:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.