AlignMMBench: Evaluating Chinese Multimodal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09295v2
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 02:14:49 GMT
- Title: AlignMMBench: Evaluating Chinese Multimodal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models
- Authors: Yuhang Wu, Wenmeng Yu, Yean Cheng, Yan Wang, Xiaohan Zhang, Jiazheng Xu, Ming Ding, Yuxiao Dong,
- Abstract summary: We introduce AlignMMBench, a comprehensive alignment benchmark for emerging Chinese Vision-Language Models (VLMs)
This benchmark is meticulously curated from real-world scenarios and Chinese Internet sources, encompassing thirteen specific tasks across three categories, and includes both single-turn and multi-turn dialogue scenarios.
To facilitate the evaluation pipeline, we propose CritiqueVLM, a rule-calibrated evaluator that exceeds GPT-4's evaluation ability.
- Score: 34.843603169616486
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Evaluating the alignment capabilities of large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is essential for determining their effectiveness as helpful assistants. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on basic abilities using nonverbal methods, such as yes-no and multiple-choice questions. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing AlignMMBench, a comprehensive alignment benchmark specifically designed for emerging Chinese VLMs. This benchmark is meticulously curated from real-world scenarios and Chinese Internet sources, encompassing thirteen specific tasks across three categories, and includes both single-turn and multi-turn dialogue scenarios. Incorporating a prompt rewrite strategy, AlignMMBench encompasses 1,054 images and 4,978 question-answer pairs. To facilitate the evaluation pipeline, we propose CritiqueVLM, a rule-calibrated evaluator that exceeds GPT-4's evaluation ability. Finally, we report the performance of representative VLMs on AlignMMBench, offering insights into the capabilities and limitations of different VLM architectures. All evaluation codes and data are available on https://alignmmbench.github.io.
Related papers
- EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents [63.43699771428243]
EmbodiedBench is an extensive benchmark designed to evaluate vision-driven embodied agents.
We evaluated 13 leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs within EmbodiedBench.
MLLMs excel at high-level tasks but struggle with low-level manipulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T18:11:34Z) - EmbodiedEval: Evaluate Multimodal LLMs as Embodied Agents [57.4686961979566]
EmbodiedEval is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation benchmark for MLLMs with embodied tasks.
It covers a broad spectrum of existing embodied AI tasks with significantly enhanced diversity.
We evaluated the state-of-the-art MLLMs on EmbodiedEval and found that they have a significant shortfall compared to human level on embodied tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-21T03:22:10Z) - AutoBench-V: Can Large Vision-Language Models Benchmark Themselves? [65.92331309449015]
We introduce AutoBench-V, an automated framework for serving evaluation on demand, i.e., benchmarking LVLMs based on specific aspects of model capability.
Through an extensive evaluation of nine popular LVLMs across five demanded user inputs, the framework shows effectiveness and reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T17:55:08Z) - DARE: Diverse Visual Question Answering with Robustness Evaluation [16.87867803628065]
Vision Language Models (VLMs) extend remarkable capabilities of text-only large language models and vision-only models.
They struggle with a number of crucial vision-language (VL) reasoning abilities such as counting and spatial reasoning.
We introduce DARE, Diverse Visual Question Answering with Robustness Evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T16:31:50Z) - SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs.
SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions.
We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z) - ChEF: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Standardized Assessment
of Multimodal Large Language Models [49.48109472893714]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive abilities in interacting with visual content with myriad potential downstream tasks.
We present the first Comprehensive Evaluation Framework (ChEF) that can holistically profile each MLLM and fairly compare different MLLMs.
We will publicly release all the detailed implementations for further analysis, as well as an easy-to-use modular toolkit for the integration of new recipes and models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-05T16:01:40Z) - MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player? [114.45702807380415]
We propose MMBench, a benchmark for assessing the multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models.
MMBench is meticulously curated with well-designed quality control schemes.
MMBench incorporates multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese versions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-12T16:23:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.