DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17453v5
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 06:50:38 GMT
- Title: DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning
- Authors: Siyuan Guo, Cheng Deng, Ying Wen, Hechang Chen, Yi Chang, Jun Wang,
- Abstract summary: We present DS-Agent, a novel framework that harnesses large language models (LLMs) agent and case-based reasoning (CBR)
In the development stage, DS-Agent follows the CBR framework to structure an automatic iteration pipeline, which can flexibly capitalize on the expert knowledge from Kaggle.
In the deployment stage, DS-Agent implements a low-resource deployment stage with a simplified CBR paradigm, significantly reducing the demand on foundational capabilities of LLMs.
- Score: 56.887047551101574
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this work, we investigate the potential of large language models (LLMs) based agents to automate data science tasks, with the goal of comprehending task requirements, then building and training the best-fit machine learning models. Despite their widespread success, existing LLM agents are hindered by generating unreasonable experiment plans within this scenario. To this end, we present DS-Agent, a novel automatic framework that harnesses LLM agent and case-based reasoning (CBR). In the development stage, DS-Agent follows the CBR framework to structure an automatic iteration pipeline, which can flexibly capitalize on the expert knowledge from Kaggle, and facilitate consistent performance improvement through the feedback mechanism. Moreover, DS-Agent implements a low-resource deployment stage with a simplified CBR paradigm to adapt past successful solutions from the development stage for direct code generation, significantly reducing the demand on foundational capabilities of LLMs. Empirically, DS-Agent with GPT-4 achieves 100\% success rate in the development stage, while attaining 36\% improvement on average one pass rate across alternative LLMs in the deployment stage. In both stages, DS-Agent achieves the best rank in performance, costing \$1.60 and \$0.13 per run with GPT-4, respectively. Our data and code are open-sourced at https://github.com/guosyjlu/DS-Agent.
Related papers
- AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoML [56.565200973244146]
Automated machine learning (AutoML) accelerates AI development by automating tasks in the development pipeline.
Recent works have started exploiting large language models (LLM) to lessen such burden.
This paper proposes AutoML-Agent, a novel multi-agent framework tailored for full-pipeline AutoML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T20:01:09Z) - Agent Q: Advanced Reasoning and Learning for Autonomous AI Agents [44.34340798542]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks requiring complex reasoning.
Traditional supervised pre-training on static datasets falls short in enabling autonomous agent capabilities.
We propose a framework that combines guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) search with a self-critique mechanism and iterative fine-tuning on agent interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T20:52:13Z) - Large Language Models Can Self-Improve At Web Agent Tasks [37.17001438055515]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated some capability to navigate novel environments as agents in a zero-shot or few-shot fashion.
We explore the extent to which LLMs can self-improve their performance as agents in long-horizon tasks in a complex environment using the WebArena benchmark.
We achieve a 31% improvement in task completion rate over the base model on the WebArena benchmark through a self-improvement procedure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T17:52:36Z) - Enhancing the General Agent Capabilities of Low-Parameter LLMs through Tuning and Multi-Branch Reasoning [56.82041895921434]
Open-source pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong language understanding and generation capabilities.
When used as agents for dealing with complex problems in the real world, their performance is far inferior to large commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T03:48:12Z) - Agent-FLAN: Designing Data and Methods of Effective Agent Tuning for Large Language Models [56.00992369295851]
Open-sourced Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved great success in various NLP tasks, however, they are still far inferior to API-based models when acting as agents.
This paper delivers three key observations: (1) the current agent training corpus is entangled with both formats following and agent reasoning, which significantly shifts from the distribution of its pre-training data; (2) LLMs exhibit different learning speeds on the capabilities required by agent tasks; and (3) current approaches have side-effects when improving agent abilities by introducing hallucinations.
We propose Agent-FLAN to effectively Fine-tune LANguage models for Agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T16:26:10Z) - Dynamic LLM-Agent Network: An LLM-agent Collaboration Framework with
Agent Team Optimization [59.39113350538332]
Large language model (LLM) agents have been shown effective on a wide range of tasks, and by ensembling multiple LLM agents, their performances could be further improved.
Existing approaches employ a fixed set of agents to interact with each other in a static architecture.
We build a framework named Dynamic LLM-Agent Network ($textbfDyLAN$) for LLM-agent collaboration on complicated tasks like reasoning and code generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T16:05:48Z) - AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks.
We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.