Prompting Explicit and Implicit Knowledge for Multi-hop Question Answering Based on Human Reading Process

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.19350v6
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:12:47 GMT
• Title: Prompting Explicit and Implicit Knowledge for Multi-hop Question Answering Based on Human Reading Process
• Authors: Guangming Huang, Yunfei Long, Cunjin Luo, Jiaxing Shen, Xia Sun,
• Abstract summary: Psychological studies suggest a vital connection between explicit information in passages and human prior knowledge during reading. We introduce a Prompting Explicit and Implicit knowledge (PEI) framework, which uses prompts to connect explicit and implicit knowledge. Our model incorporates type-specific reasoning via prompts, a form of implicit knowledge.
• Score: 6.394137489788181
• License:
• Abstract: Pre-trained language models (PLMs) leverage chains-of-thought (CoT) to simulate human reasoning and inference processes, achieving proficient performance in multi-hop QA. However, a gap persists between PLMs' reasoning abilities and those of humans when tackling complex problems. Psychological studies suggest a vital connection between explicit information in passages and human prior knowledge during reading. Nevertheless, current research has given insufficient attention to linking input passages and PLMs' pre-training-based knowledge from the perspective of human cognition studies. In this study, we introduce a Prompting Explicit and Implicit knowledge (PEI) framework, which uses prompts to connect explicit and implicit knowledge, aligning with human reading process for multi-hop QA. We consider the input passages as explicit knowledge, employing them to elicit implicit knowledge through unified prompt reasoning. Furthermore, our model incorporates type-specific reasoning via prompts, a form of implicit knowledge. Experimental results show that PEI performs comparably to the state-of-the-art on HotpotQA. Ablation studies confirm the efficacy of our model in bridging and integrating explicit and implicit knowledge.

Related papers

• Do great minds think alike? Investigating Human-AI Complementarity in Question Answering with CAIMIRA [43.116608441891096]
  Humans outperform AI systems in knowledge-grounded abductive and conceptual reasoning. State-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 and LLaMA show superior performance on targeted information retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T03:53:26Z)
• Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever [48.5585921817745]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to automate the knowledge tagging task. We show the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks. By proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T23:30:01Z)
• Large Language Models are Limited in Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning [65.72847298578071]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive knowledge and strong capabilities in performing in-context reasoning. This paper focuses on a significant aspect of out-of-context reasoning: Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning (OCKR), which is to combine multiple knowledge to infer new knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T15:58:59Z)
• Context Retrieval via Normalized Contextual Latent Interaction for Conversational Agent [3.9635467316436133]
  We present a novel method, PK-NCLI, that is able to accurately and efficiently identify relevant auxiliary information to improve the quality of conversational responses. Our experimental results indicate that PK-NCLI outperforms the state-of-the-art method, PK-FoCus, in terms of perplexity, knowledge grounding, and training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T18:53:51Z)
• Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents [80.5213198675411]
  Large language models (LLMs) have dramatically enhanced the field of language intelligence. LLMs leverage the intriguing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning techniques, obliging them to formulate intermediate steps en route to deriving an answer. Recent research endeavors have extended CoT reasoning methodologies to nurture the development of autonomous language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:30:55Z)
• In-Context Analogical Reasoning with Pre-Trained Language Models [10.344428417489237]
  We explore the use of intuitive language-based abstractions to support analogy in AI systems. Specifically, we apply large pre-trained language models (PLMs) to visual Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We find that PLMs exhibit a striking capacity for zero-shot relational reasoning, exceeding human performance and nearing supervised vision-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T04:22:26Z)
• Knowledge Rumination for Pre-trained Language Models [77.55888291165462]
  We propose a new paradigm dubbed Knowledge Rumination to help the pre-trained language model utilize related latent knowledge without retrieving it from the external corpus. We apply the proposed knowledge rumination to various language models, including RoBERTa, DeBERTa, and GPT-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:47:09Z)
• UNTER: A Unified Knowledge Interface for Enhancing Pre-trained Language Models [100.4659557650775]
  We propose a UNified knowledge inTERface, UNTER, to provide a unified perspective to exploit both structured knowledge and unstructured knowledge. With both forms of knowledge injected, UNTER gains continuous improvements on a series of knowledge-driven NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T17:33:28Z)
• A Unified End-to-End Retriever-Reader Framework for Knowledge-based VQA [67.75989848202343]
  This paper presents a unified end-to-end retriever-reader framework towards knowledge-based VQA. We shed light on the multi-modal implicit knowledge from vision-language pre-training models to mine its potential in knowledge reasoning. Our scheme is able to not only provide guidance for knowledge retrieval, but also drop these instances potentially error-prone towards question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T02:35:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.