The Case for Animal-Friendly AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01199v1
• Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 12:41:11 GMT
• Title: The Case for Animal-Friendly AI
• Authors: Sankalpa Ghose, Yip Fai Tse, Kasra Rasaee, Jeff Sebo, Peter Singer
• Abstract summary: We develop a proof-of-concept Evaluation System for evaluating animal consideration in large language models (LLMs) Preliminary results suggest that the outcomes of the tested models can be benchmarked regarding the consideration they give to animals. This study serves as a step towards more useful and responsible AI systems that better recognize and respect the vital interests and perspectives of all sentient beings.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence is seen as increasingly important, and potentially profoundly so, but the fields of AI ethics and AI engineering have not fully recognized that these technologies, including large language models (LLMs), will have massive impacts on animals. We argue that this impact matters, because animals matter morally. As a first experiment in evaluating animal consideration in LLMs, we constructed a proof-of-concept Evaluation System, which assesses LLM responses and biases from multiple perspectives. This system evaluates LLM outputs by two criteria: their truthfulness, and the degree of consideration they give to the interests of animals. We tested OpenAI ChatGPT 4 and Anthropic Claude 2.1 using a set of structured queries and predefined normative perspectives. Preliminary results suggest that the outcomes of the tested models can be benchmarked regarding the consideration they give to animals, and that generated positions and biases might be addressed and mitigated with more developed and validated systems. Our research contributes one possible approach to integrating animal ethics in AI, opening pathways for future studies and practical applications in various fields, including education, public policy, and regulation, that involve or relate to animals and society. Overall, this study serves as a step towards more useful and responsible AI systems that better recognize and respect the vital interests and perspectives of all sentient beings.

Related papers

• Do great minds think alike? Investigating Human-AI Complementarity in Question Answering with CAIMIRA [43.116608441891096]
  Humans outperform AI systems in knowledge-grounded abductive and conceptual reasoning. State-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 and LLaMA show superior performance on targeted information retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T03:53:26Z)
• Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
  Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps [3.8214695776749013]
  This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the AI ethics literature over the past two decades. They present seven key AI ethics issues, encompassing the Collingridge dilemma, the AI status debate, challenges associated with AI transparency and explainability, privacy protection complications, considerations of justice and fairness, concerns about algocracy and human enfeeblement, and the issue of superintelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T21:43:21Z)
• Computer Vision for Primate Behavior Analysis in the Wild [61.08941894580172]
  Video-based behavioral monitoring has great potential for transforming how we study animal cognition and behavior. There is still a fairly large gap between the exciting prospects and what can actually be achieved in practice today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T18:59:56Z)
• The Animal-AI Environment: A Virtual Laboratory For Comparative Cognition and Artificial Intelligence Research [13.322270147627151]
  The Animal-AI Environment is a game-based research platform designed to facilitate collaboration between the artificial intelligence and comparative cognition research communities. New features include interactive buttons, reward dispensers, and player notifications. We present results from a series of agents on newly designed tests and the Animal-AI Testbed of 900 tasks inspired by research in the field of comparative cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:18:10Z)
• The AI Incident Database as an Educational Tool to Raise Awareness of AI Harms: A Classroom Exploration of Efficacy, Limitations, & Future Improvements [14.393183391019292]
  The AI Incident Database (AIID) is one of the few attempts at offering a relatively comprehensive database indexing prior instances of harms or near harms stemming from the deployment of AI technologies in the real world. This study assesses the effectiveness of AIID as an educational tool to raise awareness regarding the prevalence and severity of AI harms in socially high-stakes domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T02:55:09Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Perspectives on individual animal identification from biology and computer vision [58.81800919492064]
  We review current advances of computer vision identification techniques to provide both computer scientists and biologists with an overview of the available tools. We conclude by offering recommendations for starting an animal identification project, illustrate current limitations and propose how they might be addressed in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-28T16:50:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.