Fine Tuning vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation for Less Popular Knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01432v4
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:47:33 GMT
• Title: Fine Tuning vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation for Less Popular Knowledge
• Authors: Heydar Soudani, Evangelos Kanoulas, Faegheh Hasibi,
• Abstract summary: Two approaches to enhance the performance of LMs on low-frequent topics are: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and fine-tuning (FT) over synthetic data. This paper explores and evaluates the impact of RAG and FT on customizing LMs in handling low-frequency entities on question answering tasks. Our findings indicate that while FT boosts the performance across entities of varying popularity, RAG surpasses FT by a large margin particularly for least popular factual knowledge.
• Score: 15.553942864736989
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Language Models (LMs) memorize a vast amount of factual knowledge, exhibiting strong performance across diverse tasks and domains. However, it has been observed that the performance diminishes when dealing with less-popular or low-frequency concepts and entities, for example in domain specific applications. The two prominent approaches to enhance the performance of LMs on low-frequent topics are: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and fine-tuning (FT) over synthetic data. This paper explores and evaluates the impact of RAG and FT on customizing LMs in handling low-frequency entities on question answering tasks. We conduct extensive experiments on twelve LMs of varying size and type and different fine tuning, data augmentation, and retrieval models. Our findings indicate that while FT boosts the performance across entities of varying popularity, RAG surpasses FT by a large margin particularly for least popular factual knowledge. Additionally, the success of both RAG and FT approaches is amplified by improving retrieval and data augmentation techniques. Fine tuning, while beneficial for small LMs, requires extensive resources. To address this issue, we propose the new Stimulus RAG approach that surpasses the effectiveness of fine tuning based approaches, thereby eliminating the need for the costly data augmentation and fine tuning step for enriching LMs with less popular factual knowledge.

Related papers

• RAG-DDR: Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Differentiable Data Rewards [78.74923079748521]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven its effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) Current approaches use instruction tuning to optimize LLMs, improving their ability to utilize retrieved knowledge. We propose a Differentiable Data Rewards ( DDR) method, which trains RAG systems by aligning data preferences between different RAG modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T12:53:29Z)
• Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG [36.754491649652664]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) empowers large language models (LLMs) to utilize external knowledge sources. This paper investigates the detrimental impact of retrieved "hard negatives" as a key contributor. To mitigate this and enhance the robustness of long-context LLM-based RAG, we propose both training-free and training-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T12:30:07Z)
• FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
  We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications. FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
• Speculative RAG: Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation through Drafting [68.90949377014742]
  Speculative RAG is a framework that leverages a larger generalist LM to efficiently verify multiple RAG drafts produced in parallel by a smaller, distilled specialist LM. Our method accelerates RAG by delegating drafting to the smaller specialist LM, with the larger generalist LM performing a single verification pass over the drafts. It notably enhances accuracy by up to 12.97% while reducing latency by 51% compared to conventional RAG systems on PubHealth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T06:50:19Z)
• Fine-Tuning or Fine-Failing? Debunking Performance Myths in Large Language Models [0.8399688944263842]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the capability to understand and generate human-like text from input queries. This study extends this concept to the integration of LLMs within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on the LLMs' capacity for data extraction and contextual understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T04:35:17Z)
• Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.29595679428105]
  We investigate how the pre-training loss, supervised data amount, and augmented data amount influence the reasoning performances of a supervised LLM. We find that rejection samples from multiple models push LLaMA-7B to an accuracy of 49.3% on GSM8K which outperforms the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) accuracy of 35.9% significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T15:34:01Z)
• To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
  Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs. We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting. Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z)
• When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories [58.3421305091187]
  This paper aims to understand LMs' strengths and limitations in memorizing factual knowledge. We find that LMs struggle with less popular factual knowledge, and that scaling fails to appreciably improve memorization of factual knowledge in the long tail. We devise a simple, yet effective, method for powerful and efficient retrieval-augmented LMs, which retrieves non-parametric memories only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:30:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.