Unsupervised Learning Approaches for Identifying ICU Patient Subgroups:
Do Results Generalise?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02945v1
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:16:37 GMT
- Title: Unsupervised Learning Approaches for Identifying ICU Patient Subgroups:
Do Results Generalise?
- Authors: Harry Mayne, Guy Parsons and Adam Mahdi
- Abstract summary: The use of unsupervised learning to identify patient subgroups has emerged as a potentially promising direction to improve ICU efficiency.
It is unclear whether common patient subgroups exist across different ICUs, which would determine whether ICU restructuring could be operationalised in a standardised manner.
We extracted 16 features representing medical resource need and used consensus clustering to derive patient subgroups.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The use of unsupervised learning to identify patient subgroups has emerged as
a potentially promising direction to improve the efficiency of Intensive Care
Units (ICUs). By identifying subgroups of patients with similar levels of
medical resource need, ICUs could be restructured into a collection of smaller
subunits, each catering to a specific group. However, it is unclear whether
common patient subgroups exist across different ICUs, which would determine
whether ICU restructuring could be operationalised in a standardised manner. In
this paper, we tested the hypothesis that common ICU patient subgroups exist by
examining whether the results from one existing study generalise to a different
dataset. We extracted 16 features representing medical resource need and used
consensus clustering to derive patient subgroups, replicating the previous
study. We found limited similarities between our results and those of the
previous study, providing evidence against the hypothesis. Our findings imply
that there is significant variation between ICUs; thus, a standardised
restructuring approach is unlikely to be appropriate. Instead, potential
efficiency gains might be greater when the number and nature of the subunits
are tailored to each ICU individually.
Related papers
- How does promoting the minority fraction affect generalization? A theoretical study of the one-hidden-layer neural network on group imbalance [64.1656365676171]
Group imbalance has been a known problem in empirical risk minimization.
This paper quantifies the impact of individual groups on the sample complexity, the convergence rate, and the average and group-level testing performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T04:38:05Z) - The Role of Subgroup Separability in Group-Fair Medical Image
Classification [18.29079361470428]
We find a relationship between subgroup separability, subgroup disparities, and performance degradation when models are trained on data with systematic bias such as underdiagnosis.
Our findings shed new light on the question of how models become biased, providing important insights for the development of fair medical imaging AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-06T06:06:47Z) - Auditing Algorithmic Fairness in Machine Learning for Health with
Severity-Based LOGAN [70.76142503046782]
We propose supplementing machine learning-based (ML) healthcare tools for bias with SLOGAN, an automatic tool for capturing local biases in a clinical prediction task.
LOGAN adapts an existing tool, LOcal Group biAs detectioN, by contextualizing group bias detection in patient illness severity and past medical history.
On average, SLOGAN identifies larger fairness disparities in over 75% of patient groups than LOGAN while maintaining clustering quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-16T08:04:12Z) - Assessing Social Determinants-Related Performance Bias of Machine
Learning Models: A case of Hyperchloremia Prediction in ICU Population [6.8473641147443995]
We evaluated four classifiers built to predict Hyperchloremia, a condition that often results from aggressive fluids administration in the ICU population.
We observed that adding social determinants features in addition to the lab-based ones improved model performance on all patients.
We urge future researchers to design models that proactively adjust for potential biases and include subgroup reporting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-18T03:58:50Z) - Unsupervised Learning to Subphenotype Delirium Patients from Electronic
Health Records [5.183023864443785]
Delirium is a common acute onset brain dysfunction in the emergency setting and is associated with higher mortality.
It is difficult to detect and monitor since its presentations and risk factors can be different depending on the underlying medical condition of patients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-31T20:58:57Z) - Evaluating subgroup disparity using epistemic uncertainty in mammography [3.045076250501715]
We explore how uncertainty can be used to evaluate disparity in patient demographics (race) and data acquisition subgroups for breast density assessment.
Our results show that even if aggregate performance is comparable, the choice of uncertainty metric quantification can significantly the subgroup level.
We hope this analysis can promote further work on how uncertainty can be leveraged to increase transparency of machine learning applications for clinical deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-06T16:36:48Z) - Deep Semi-Supervised Embedded Clustering (DSEC) for Stratification of
Heart Failure Patients [50.48904066814385]
In this work we apply deep semi-supervised embedded clustering to determine data-driven patient subgroups of heart failure.
We find clinically relevant clusters from an embedded space derived from heterogeneous data.
The proposed algorithm can potentially find new undiagnosed subgroups of patients that have different outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-24T12:56:46Z) - Recommendations for Bayesian hierarchical model specifications for
case-control studies in mental health [0.0]
Researchers must choose whether to assume all subjects are drawn from a common population, or to model them as deriving from separate populations.
We ran systematic simulations on synthetic multi-group behavioural data from a commonly used bandit task.
We found that fitting groups separately provided the most accurate and robust inference across all conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T14:19:59Z) - Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with
Uncertainty Quantification [84.53697297858146]
Subgroup analysis of treatment effects plays an important role in applications from medicine to public policy to recommender systems.
Most of the current methods of subgroup analysis begin with a particular algorithm for estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE)
This paper develops a new method for subgroup analysis, R2P, that addresses all these weaknesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-14T14:50:02Z) - Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from
Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling
Approach [55.41644538483948]
This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units.
The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z) - Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of
Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication.
We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance.
We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.