Federated Learning Under Attack: Exposing Vulnerabilities through Data Poisoning Attacks in Computer Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02983v1
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:03:15 GMT
• Title: Federated Learning Under Attack: Exposing Vulnerabilities through Data Poisoning Attacks in Computer Networks
• Authors: Ehsan Nowroozi, Imran Haider, Rahim Taheri, Mauro Conti
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) is a machine learning approach that enables multiple decentralized devices or edge servers to collaboratively train a shared model without exchanging raw data. During the training and sharing of model updates between clients and servers, data and models are susceptible to different data-poisoning attacks. We considered two types of data-poisoning attacks, label flipping (LF) and feature poisoning (FP), and applied them with a novel approach.
• Score: 17.857547954232754
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a machine learning (ML) approach that enables multiple decentralized devices or edge servers to collaboratively train a shared model without exchanging raw data. During the training and sharing of model updates between clients and servers, data and models are susceptible to different data-poisoning attacks. In this study, our motivation is to explore the severity of data poisoning attacks in the computer network domain because they are easy to implement but difficult to detect. We considered two types of data-poisoning attacks, label flipping (LF) and feature poisoning (FP), and applied them with a novel approach. In LF, we randomly flipped the labels of benign data and trained the model on the manipulated data. For FP, we randomly manipulated the highly contributing features determined using the Random Forest algorithm. The datasets used in this experiment were CIC and UNSW related to computer networks. We generated adversarial samples using the two attacks mentioned above, which were applied to a small percentage of datasets. Subsequently, we trained and tested the accuracy of the model on adversarial datasets. We recorded the results for both benign and manipulated datasets and observed significant differences between the accuracy of the models on different datasets. From the experimental results, it is evident that the LF attack failed, whereas the FP attack showed effective results, which proved its significance in fooling a server. With a 1% LF attack on the CIC, the accuracy was approximately 0.0428 and the ASR was 0.9564; hence, the attack is easily detectable, while with a 1% FP attack, the accuracy and ASR were both approximately 0.9600, hence, FP attacks are difficult to detect. We repeated the experiment with different poisoning percentages.

Related papers

• Unlearnable Examples Detection via Iterative Filtering [84.59070204221366]
  Deep neural networks are proven to be vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. It is quite beneficial and challenging to detect poisoned samples from a mixed dataset. We propose an Iterative Filtering approach for UEs identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T13:26:13Z)
• DALA: A Distribution-Aware LoRA-Based Adversarial Attack against Language Models [64.79319733514266]
  Adversarial attacks can introduce subtle perturbations to input data. Recent attack methods can achieve a relatively high attack success rate (ASR) We propose a Distribution-Aware LoRA-based Adversarial Attack (DALA) method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T23:43:47Z)
• Towards Attack-tolerant Federated Learning via Critical Parameter Analysis [85.41873993551332]
  Federated learning systems are susceptible to poisoning attacks when malicious clients send false updates to the central server. This paper proposes a new defense strategy, FedCPA (Federated learning with Critical Analysis) Our attack-tolerant aggregation method is based on the observation that benign local models have similar sets of top-k and bottom-k critical parameters, whereas poisoned local models do not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T05:37:55Z)
• Securing Federated Learning against Overwhelming Collusive Attackers [7.587927338603662]
  We propose two graph theoretic algorithms, based on Minimum Spanning Tree and k-Densest graph, by leveraging correlations between local models. Our FL model can nullify the influence of attackers even when they are up to 70% of all the clients. We establish the superiority of our algorithms over the existing ones using accuracy, attack success rate, and early detection round.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T13:41:04Z)
• FL-Defender: Combating Targeted Attacks in Federated Learning [7.152674461313707]
  Federated learning (FL) enables learning a global machine learning model from local data distributed among a set of participating workers. FL is vulnerable to targeted poisoning attacks that negatively impact the integrity of the learned model. We propose textitFL-Defender as a method to combat FL targeted attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T16:04:46Z)
• DAD: Data-free Adversarial Defense at Test Time [21.741026088202126]
  Deep models are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks. Privacy has become an important concern, restricting access to only trained models but not the training data. We propose a completely novel problem of 'test-time adversarial defense in absence of training data and even their statistics'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T15:16:13Z)
• Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secrets [53.866927712193416]
  We show that an adversary who can poison a training dataset can cause models trained on this dataset to leak private details belonging to other parties. Our attacks are effective across membership inference, attribute inference, and data extraction. Our results cast doubts on the relevance of cryptographic privacy guarantees in multiparty protocols for machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T18:06:28Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Gradient-based Data Subversion Attack Against Binary Classifiers [9.414651358362391]
  In this work, we focus on label contamination attack in which an attacker poisons the labels of data to compromise the functionality of the system. We exploit the gradients of a differentiable convex loss function with respect to the predicted label as a warm-start and formulate different strategies to find a set of data instances to contaminate. Our experiments show that the proposed approach outperforms the baselines and is computationally efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T09:04:32Z)
• Mitigating the Impact of Adversarial Attacks in Very Deep Networks [10.555822166916705]
  Deep Neural Network (DNN) models have vulnerabilities related to security concerns. Data poisoning-enabled perturbation attacks are complex adversarial ones that inject false data into models. We propose an attack-agnostic-based defense method for mitigating their influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T21:25:44Z)
• Adversarial Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning [62.17538130778111]
  Existing adversarial learning approaches mostly use class labels to generate adversarial samples that lead to incorrect predictions. We propose a novel adversarial attack for unlabeled data, which makes the model confuse the instance-level identities of the perturbed data samples. We present a self-supervised contrastive learning framework to adversarially train a robust neural network without labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T08:24:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.