Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03163v2
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 06:18:07 GMT
• Title: Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering
• Authors: Chenglei Si, Yanzhe Zhang, Ryan Li, Zhengyuan Yang, Ruibo Liu, Diyi Yang,
• Abstract summary: We construct Design2Code - the first real-world benchmark for this task. We manually curate 484 diverse real-world webpages as test cases and develop a set of automatic evaluation metrics. Our fine-grained break-down metrics indicate that models mostly lag in recalling visual elements from the input webpages and generating correct layout designs.
• Score: 74.99736967448423
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI has made rapid advancements in recent years, achieving unprecedented capabilities in multimodal understanding and code generation. This can enable a new paradigm of front-end development in which multimodal large language models (MLLMs) directly convert visual designs into code implementations. In this work, we construct Design2Code - the first real-world benchmark for this task. Specifically, we manually curate 484 diverse real-world webpages as test cases and develop a set of automatic evaluation metrics to assess how well current multimodal LLMs can generate the code implementations that directly render into the given reference webpages, given the screenshots as input. We also complement automatic metrics with comprehensive human evaluations to validate the performance ranking. To rigorously benchmark MLLMs, we test various multimodal prompting methods on frontier models such as GPT-4o, GPT-4V, Gemini, and Claude. Our fine-grained break-down metrics indicate that models mostly lag in recalling visual elements from the input webpages and generating correct layout designs.

Related papers

• CoDet-M4: Detecting Machine-Generated Code in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Generator and Multi-Domain Settings [32.72039589832989]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, automating programming with remarkable efficiency. These advancements challenge programming skills, ethics, and assessment integrity, making the detection of LLM-generated code essential for maintaining accountability and standards. We propose a framework capable of distinguishing between human- and LLM-written code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T21:41:37Z)
• Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling [128.24325909395188]
  We introduce InternVL 2.5, an advanced multimodal large language model (MLLM) series that builds upon InternVL 2.0. InternVL 2.5 exhibits competitive performance, rivaling leading commercial models such as GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. We hope this model contributes to the open-source community by setting new standards for developing and applying multimodal AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:57:08Z)
• EmbedLLM: Learning Compact Representations of Large Language Models [28.49433308281983]
  We propose EmbedLLM, a framework designed to learn compact vector representations of Large Language Models. We introduce an encoder-decoder approach for learning such embeddings, along with a systematic framework to evaluate their effectiveness. Empirical results show that EmbedLLM outperforms prior methods in model routing both in accuracy and latency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T05:43:24Z)
• Align$^2$LLaVA: Cascaded Human and Large Language Model Preference Alignment for Multi-modal Instruction Curation [56.75665429851673]
  This paper introduces a novel instruction curation algorithm, derived from two unique perspectives, human and LLM preference alignment. Experiments demonstrate that we can maintain or even improve model performance by compressing synthetic multimodal instructions by up to 90%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T08:20:59Z)
• D2LLM: Decomposed and Distilled Large Language Models for Semantic Search [18.63768158439252]
  We present D2LLMs-Decomposed and Distilled LLMs for semantic search. We decompose a cross-encoder into an efficient bi-encoder integrated with Pooling by Multihead Attention and an Interaction Emulation Module. Our experiments show that D2LLM surpasses five leading baselines in terms of all metrics across three tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:03:04Z)
• Multimodal Structured Generation: CVPR's 2nd MMFM Challenge Technical Report [0.0]
  Multimodal Foundation Models (MMFMs) have shown remarkable performance on various computer vision and natural language processing tasks. They require more compute, time, and engineering resources to finetune and deploy compared to traditional, unimodal models. We present Multimodal Structured Generation, a general framework which constrains the output logits of frozen MMFMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T10:45:47Z)
• WebCode2M: A Real-World Dataset for Code Generation from Webpage Designs [49.91550773480978]
  This paper introduces WebCode2M, a new dataset comprising 2.56 million instances, each containing a design image along with the corresponding webpage code and layout details. To validate the effectiveness of WebCode2M, we introduce a baseline model based on the Vision Transformer (ViT), named WebCoder, and establish a benchmark for fair comparison. The benchmarking results demonstrate that our dataset significantly improves the ability of MLLMs to generate code from webpage designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T15:05:48Z)
• InfiBench: Evaluating the Question-Answering Capabilities of Code Large Language Models [56.723509505549536]
  InfiBench is the first large-scale freeform question-answering (QA) benchmark for code to our knowledge. It comprises 234 carefully selected high-quality Stack Overflow questions that span across 15 programming languages. We conduct a systematic evaluation for over 100 latest code LLMs on InfiBench, leading to a series of novel and insightful findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T02:06:30Z)
• OneLLM: One Framework to Align All Modalities with Language [90.14915575477197]
  We present OneLLM, an MLLM that aligns eight modalities to language using a unified framework. OneLLM is evaluated on 25 diverse benchmarks, encompassing tasks such as multimodal captioning, question answering and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T18:59:19Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models [73.86954509967416]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks. This paper presents the first comprehensive MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME. It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T09:22:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.