AI Insights: A Case Study on Utilizing ChatGPT Intelligence for Research Paper Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03293v1
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 19:47:57 GMT
• Title: AI Insights: A Case Study on Utilizing ChatGPT Intelligence for Research Paper Analysis
• Authors: Anjalee De Silva, Janaka L. Wijekoon, Rashini Liyanarachchi, Rrubaa Panchendrarajan, Weranga Rajapaksha
• Abstract summary: The study selected the textitApplication of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Treatment as the research topic. Research papers related to this topic were collected from three major publication databases Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Scopus. ChatGPT models were used to identify the category, scope, and relevant information from the research papers.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper discusses the effectiveness of leveraging Chatbot: Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) versions 3.5 and 4 for analyzing research papers for effective writing of scientific literature surveys. The study selected the \textit{Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Treatment} as the research topic. Research papers related to this topic were collected from three major publication databases Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Scopus. ChatGPT models were used to identify the category, scope, and relevant information from the research papers for automatic identification of relevant papers related to Breast Cancer Treatment (BCT), organization of papers according to scope, and identification of key information for survey paper writing. Evaluations performed using ground truth data annotated using subject experts reveal, that GPT-4 achieves 77.3\% accuracy in identifying the research paper categories and 50\% of the papers were correctly identified by GPT-4 for their scopes. Further, the results demonstrate that GPT-4 can generate reasons for its decisions with an average of 27\% new words, and 67\% of the reasons given by the model were completely agreeable to the subject experts.

Related papers

• Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs [3.9627148816681284]
  This article assesses which ChatGPT inputs produce better quality score estimates. The optimal input is the article title and abstract, with average ChatGPT scores based on these correlating at 0.67 with human scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T09:19:21Z)
• ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT's Capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator and Data Predictor [4.64714933619189]
  We systematically probed the capabilities of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 across four central components of the scientific process. In Study 1 (Research Librarian), unlike human researchers, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 hallucinated authoritatively generating fictional references. In Study 2 (Research Ethicist), GPT-4 (though not GPT-3.5) proved capable of detecting violations like p-hacking in fictional research protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T22:30:06Z)
• An Information Retrieval and Extraction Tool for Covid-19 Related Papers [0.0]
  The main focus of this paper is to provide researchers with a better search tool for COVID-19 related papers. Our tool has shown the potential to assist researchers by automating a topic-based search of CORD-19 papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T01:34:50Z)
• De-identification of clinical free text using natural language processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
  Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process. Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z)
• Evaluation of ChatGPT-Generated Medical Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [7.587141771901865]
  Large language models such as ChatGPT are increasingly explored in medical domains. This study aims to summarize the available evidence on evaluating ChatGPT's performance in medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T15:26:26Z)
• The impact and applications of ChatGPT: a systematic review of literature reviews [0.0]
  ChatGPT has become one of the most widely used natural language processing tools. With thousands of published papers demonstrating its applications across various industries and fields, ChatGPT has sparked significant interest in the research community. An overview of the available evidence from multiple reviews and studies could provide further insights, minimize redundancy, and identify areas where further research is needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T17:57:34Z)
• Application of Transformers based methods in Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Literature Review [77.34726150561087]
  This work presents a systematic literature review of state-of-the-art advances using transformer-based methods on electronic medical records (EMRs) in different NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T22:19:42Z)
• DeID-GPT: Zero-shot Medical Text De-Identification by GPT-4 [80.36535668574804]
  We develop a novel GPT4-enabled de-identification framework (DeID-GPT") Our developed DeID-GPT showed the highest accuracy and remarkable reliability in masking private information from the unstructured medical text. This study is one of the earliest to utilize ChatGPT and GPT-4 for medical text data processing and de-identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T11:34:37Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• EBOCA: Evidences for BiOmedical Concepts Association Ontology [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes EBOCA, an ontology that describes (i) biomedical domain concepts and associations between them, and (ii) evidences supporting these associations. Test data coming from a subset of DISNET and automatic association extractions from texts has been transformed to create a Knowledge Graph that can be used in real scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-01T18:47:03Z)
• What is the State of the Art of Computer Vision-Assisted Cytology? A Systematic Literature Review [47.42354724922676]
  We conducted a Systematic Literature Review to identify the state-of-art of computer vision techniques currently applied to cytology. The most used methods in the analyzed works are deep learning-based (70 papers), while fewer works employ classic computer vision only (101 papers) We conclude that there still is a lack of high-quality datasets for many types of stains and most of the works are not mature enough to be applied in a daily clinical diagnostic routine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T13:50:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.