Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03558v1
• Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:06:34 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problem
• Authors: Yuhong Sun, Zhangyue Yin, Qipeng Guo, Jiawen Wu, Xipeng Qiu, Hui Zhao
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are highly effective in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. They are susceptible to producing unreliable conjectures in ambiguous contexts called hallucination. This paper presents a new method for evaluating LLM hallucination in Question Answering (QA) based on the unanswerable math word problem (MWP)
• Score: 58.3723958800254
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are highly effective in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, they are susceptible to producing unreliable conjectures in ambiguous contexts called hallucination. This paper presents a new method for evaluating LLM hallucination in Question Answering (QA) based on the unanswerable math word problem (MWP). To support this approach, we innovatively develop a dataset called Unanswerable Math Word Problem (UMWP) which comprises 5200 questions across five categories. We developed an evaluation methodology combining text similarity and mathematical expression detection to determine whether LLM considers the question unanswerable. The results of extensive experiments conducted on 31 LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, LLaMA, and Claude, demonstrate that in-context learning and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) training significantly enhance the model's ability to avoid hallucination. We show that utilizing MWP is a reliable and effective approach to assess hallucination. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Yuki-Asuuna/UMWP.

Related papers

• LLM Hallucination Reasoning with Zero-shot Knowledge Test [10.306443936136425]
  We introduce a new task, Hallucination Reasoning, which classifies LLM-generated text into one of three categories: aligned, misaligned, and fabricated. Our experiments conducted on new datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in hallucination reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T18:55:26Z)
• A Survey of Hallucination in Large Visual Language Models [48.794850395309076]
  The existence of hallucinations has limited the potential and practical effectiveness of LVLM in various fields. The structure of LVLMs and main causes of hallucination generation are introduced. The available hallucination evaluation benchmarks for LVLMs are presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T10:58:58Z)
• Iter-AHMCL: Alleviate Hallucination for Large Language Model via Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learning [16.883679810267342]
  Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learning (Iter-AHMCL) to address hallucination. This paper introduces a novel approach called Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learning (Iter-AHMCL) to address hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T00:15:40Z)
• LongHalQA: Long-Context Hallucination Evaluation for MultiModal Large Language Models [96.64960606650115]
  LongHalQA is an LLM-free hallucination benchmark that comprises 6K long and complex hallucination text. LongHalQA is featured by GPT4V-generated hallucinatory data that are well aligned with real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:59:58Z)
• Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks. They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences. We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models [7.705767540805267]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in their ability to write human-like text. A key challenge remains around their tendency to hallucinate generating content that appears factual but is ungrounded. This paper presents a survey of over 32 techniques developed to mitigate hallucination in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T17:56:30Z)
• Hallucination Augmented Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model [53.65682783591723]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have been shown to efficiently integrate natural language with visual information to handle multi-modal tasks. However, MLLMs still face a fundamental limitation of hallucinations, where they tend to generate erroneous or fabricated information. In this paper, we address hallucinations in MLLMs from a novel perspective of representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T04:05:15Z)
• Deficiency of Large Language Models in Finance: An Empirical Examination of Hallucination [7.627664978437055]
  hallucination is recognized as a fundamental deficiency of large language models (LLMs) This paper empirically investigates LLM models' ability of explaining financial concepts and terminologies. We evaluate the efficacy of four practical methods, including few-shot learning, Decoding by Contrasting Layers (DoLa), the Retrieval Augmentation Generation (RAG) method and the prompt-based tool learning method for a function to generate a query command.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T05:27:13Z)
• Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection [63.2543947174318]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for generative and knowledge-intensive tasks including question-answering (QA) tasks. This paper analyses the phenomenon of hallucination in medical generative QA systems using widely adopted LLMs and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T03:05:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.