A Measure for Transparent Comparison of Linguistic Diversity in Multilingual NLP Data Sets
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03909v2
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:00:41 GMT
- Title: A Measure for Transparent Comparison of Linguistic Diversity in Multilingual NLP Data Sets
- Authors: Tanja Samardzic, Ximena Gutierrez, Christian Bentz, Steven Moran, Olga Pelloni,
- Abstract summary: Typologically diverse benchmarks are increasingly created to track the progress achieved in multilingual NLP.
We propose assessing linguistic diversity of a data set against a reference language sample.
- Score: 1.1647644386277962
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Typologically diverse benchmarks are increasingly created to track the progress achieved in multilingual NLP. Linguistic diversity of these data sets is typically measured as the number of languages or language families included in the sample, but such measures do not consider structural properties of the included languages. In this paper, we propose assessing linguistic diversity of a data set against a reference language sample as a means of maximising linguistic diversity in the long run. We represent languages as sets of features and apply a version of the Jaccard index suitable for comparing sets of measures. In addition to the features extracted from typological data bases, we propose an automatic text-based measure, which can be used as a means of overcoming the well-known problem of data sparsity in manually collected features. Our diversity score is interpretable in terms of linguistic features and can identify the types of languages that are not represented in a data set. Using our method, we analyse a range of popular multilingual data sets (UD, Bible100, mBERT, XTREME, XGLUE, XNLI, XCOPA, TyDiQA, XQuAD). In addition to ranking these data sets, we find, for example, that (poly)synthetic languages are missing in almost all of them.
Related papers
- A Principled Framework for Evaluating on Typologically Diverse Languages [6.670393338187622]
We present a language sampling framework for selecting highly typologically diverse languages.
We find that our systematic methods consistently retrieve more typologically diverse language selections than previous methods in NLP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-06T09:31:02Z) - DIALECTBENCH: A NLP Benchmark for Dialects, Varieties, and Closely-Related Languages [49.38663048447942]
We propose DIALECTBENCH, the first-ever large-scale benchmark for NLP on varieties.
This allows for a comprehensive evaluation of NLP system performance on different language varieties.
We provide substantial evidence of performance disparities between standard and non-standard language varieties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-16T20:18:36Z) - GradSim: Gradient-Based Language Grouping for Effective Multilingual
Training [13.730907708289331]
We propose GradSim, a language grouping method based on gradient similarity.
Our experiments on three diverse multilingual benchmark datasets show that it leads to the largest performance gains.
Besides linguistic features, the topics of the datasets play an important role for language grouping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T18:13:37Z) - MasakhaPOS: Part-of-Speech Tagging for Typologically Diverse African
Languages [7.86385861664505]
We present MasakhaPOS, the largest part-of-speech (POS) dataset for 20 typologically diverse African languages.
We discuss the challenges in annotating POS for these languages using the UD (universal dependencies) guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T12:15:33Z) - XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic
Contextualization [98.61159823343036]
We present the Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) for assessing the ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word.
We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages.
Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T15:32:00Z) - Linguistic Typology Features from Text: Inferring the Sparse Features of
World Atlas of Language Structures [73.06435180872293]
We construct a recurrent neural network predictor based on byte embeddings and convolutional layers.
We show that some features from various linguistic types can be predicted reliably.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T21:00:53Z) - Bridging Linguistic Typology and Multilingual Machine Translation with
Multi-View Language Representations [83.27475281544868]
We use singular vector canonical correlation analysis to study what kind of information is induced from each source.
We observe that our representations embed typology and strengthen correlations with language relationships.
We then take advantage of our multi-view language vector space for multilingual machine translation, where we achieve competitive overall translation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T16:25:39Z) - XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating
Cross-lingual Generalization [128.37244072182506]
Cross-lingual TRansfer Evaluation of Multilinguals XTREME is a benchmark for evaluating the cross-lingual generalization capabilities of multilingual representations across 40 languages and 9 tasks.
We demonstrate that while models tested on English reach human performance on many tasks, there is still a sizable gap in the performance of cross-lingually transferred models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-24T19:09:37Z) - Multi-SimLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Multilingual and Cross-Lingual
Lexical Semantic Similarity [67.36239720463657]
Multi-SimLex is a large-scale lexical resource and evaluation benchmark covering datasets for 12 diverse languages.
Each language dataset is annotated for the lexical relation of semantic similarity and contains 1,888 semantically aligned concept pairs.
Owing to the alignment of concepts across languages, we provide a suite of 66 cross-lingual semantic similarity datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-10T17:17:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.