Unbiased Estimator for Distorted Conics in Camera Calibration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04583v2
• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:48:39 GMT
• Title: Unbiased Estimator for Distorted Conics in Camera Calibration
• Authors: Chaehyeon Song, Jaeho Shin, Myung-Hwan Jeon, Jongwoo Lim, Ayoung Kim
• Abstract summary: We present a novel formulation for conic-based calibration using moments. Our derivation is based on the mathematical finding that the first moment can be estimated without bias even under distortion. This allows us to track moment changes during projection and distortion, ensuring the preservation of the first moment of the distorted conic.
• Score: 17.310876803936782
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In the literature, points and conics have been major features for camera geometric calibration. Although conics are more informative features than points, the loss of the conic property under distortion has critically limited the utility of conic features in camera calibration. Many existing approaches addressed conic-based calibration by ignoring distortion or introducing 3D spherical targets to circumvent this limitation. In this paper, we present a novel formulation for conic-based calibration using moments. Our derivation is based on the mathematical finding that the first moment can be estimated without bias even under distortion. This allows us to track moment changes during projection and distortion, ensuring the preservation of the first moment of the distorted conic. With an unbiased estimator, the circular patterns can be accurately detected at the sub-pixel level and can now be fully exploited for an entire calibration pipeline, resulting in significantly improved calibration. The entire code is readily available from https://github.com/ChaehyeonSong/discocal.

Related papers

• Tilt and Average : Geometric Adjustment of the Last Layer for Recalibration [2.81765024056154]
  calibration aims to align confidence with accuracy to enhance the reliability of predictions. Several solutions based on calibration maps have been proposed to address the problem. We offer an algorithm that transforms the weights of the last layer of the classifier, distinct from the calibration-map-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T13:27:56Z)
• Orthogonal Causal Calibration [55.28164682911196]
  We prove generic upper bounds on the calibration error of any causal parameter estimate $theta$ with respect to any loss $ell$. We use our bound to analyze the convergence of two sample splitting algorithms for causal calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T03:35:25Z)
• E-Calib: A Fast, Robust and Accurate Calibration Toolbox for Event Cameras [18.54225086007182]
  We present E-Calib, a novel, fast, robust, and accurate calibration toolbox for event cameras. The proposed method is tested in a variety of rigorous experiments for different event camera models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T12:16:38Z)
• A Deep Perceptual Measure for Lens and Camera Calibration [35.03926427249506]
  In place of the traditional multi-image calibration process, we propose to infer the camera calibration parameters directly from a single image. We train this network using automatically generated samples from a large-scale panorama dataset. We conduct a large-scale human perception study where we ask participants to judge the realism of 3D objects composited with correct and biased camera calibration parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T18:40:45Z)
• Dynamic Event Camera Calibration [27.852239869987947]
  We present the first dynamic event camera calibration algorithm. It calibrates directly from events captured during relative motion between camera and calibration pattern. As demonstrated through our results, the obtained calibration method is highly convenient and reliably calibrates from data sequences spanning less than 10 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T14:52:58Z)
• On the Dark Side of Calibration for Modern Neural Networks [65.83956184145477]
  We show the breakdown of expected calibration error (ECE) into predicted confidence and refinement. We highlight that regularisation based calibration only focuses on naively reducing a model's confidence. We find that many calibration approaches with the likes of label smoothing, mixup etc. lower the utility of a DNN by degrading its refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T11:04:14Z)
• How to Calibrate Your Event Camera [58.80418612800161]
  We propose a generic event camera calibration framework using image reconstruction. We show that neural-network-based image reconstruction is well suited for the task of intrinsic and extrinsic calibration of event cameras.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T07:06:58Z)
• Localized Calibration: Metrics and Recalibration [133.07044916594361]
  We propose a fine-grained calibration metric that spans the gap between fully global and fully individualized calibration. We then introduce a localized recalibration method, LoRe, that improves the LCE better than existing recalibration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:22:12Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles [79.4957965474334]
  We show that deep-ensembles do not necessarily lead to improved calibration properties. We show that standard ensembling methods, when used in conjunction with modern techniques such as mixup regularization, can lead to less calibrated models. This text examines the interplay between three of the most simple and commonly used approaches to leverage deep learning when data is scarce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T07:32:24Z)
• Superaccurate Camera Calibration via Inverse Rendering [0.19336815376402716]
  We propose a new method for camera calibration using the principle of inverse rendering. Instead of relying solely on detected feature points, we use an estimate of the internal parameters and the pose of the calibration object to implicitly render a non-photorealistic equivalent of the optical features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-20T10:26:16Z)
• Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Loss [77.92765139898906]
  Miscalibration is a mismatch between a model's confidence and its correctness. We show that focal loss allows us to learn models that are already very well calibrated. We show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art calibration without compromising on accuracy in almost all cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T17:35:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.