Decoding the AI Pen: Techniques and Challenges in Detecting AI-Generated Text
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05750v3
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:49:32 GMT
- Title: Decoding the AI Pen: Techniques and Challenges in Detecting AI-Generated Text
- Authors: Sara Abdali, Richard Anarfi, CJ Barberan, Jia He,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Generation (NLG) by demonstrating an impressive ability to generate human-like text.
However, their widespread usage introduces challenges that necessitate thoughtful examination, ethical scrutiny, and responsible practices.
- Score: 4.927763944523323
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Generation (NLG) by demonstrating an impressive ability to generate human-like text. However, their widespread usage introduces challenges that necessitate thoughtful examination, ethical scrutiny, and responsible practices. In this study, we delve into these challenges, explore existing strategies for mitigating them, with a particular emphasis on identifying AI-generated text as the ultimate solution. Additionally, we assess the feasibility of detection from a theoretical perspective and propose novel research directions to address the current limitations in this domain.
Related papers
- Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods [13.14749943120523]
Knowing whether a text was produced by human or artificial intelligence (AI) is important to determining its trustworthiness.
State-of-the art approaches to AIGT detection include watermarking, statistical and stylistic analysis, and machine learning classification.
We aim to provide insight into the salient factors that combine to determine how "detectable" AIGT text is under different scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T18:31:49Z) - Enhancing Text Authenticity: A Novel Hybrid Approach for AI-Generated Text Detection [8.149808049643344]
We propose a novel hybrid approach that combines TF-IDF techniques with advanced machine learning models.
Our approach achieves superior performance compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T10:21:54Z) - Who Writes the Review, Human or AI? [0.36498648388765503]
This study proposes a methodology to accurately distinguish AI-generated and human-written book reviews.
Our approach utilizes transfer learning, enabling the model to identify generated text across different topics.
The experimental results demonstrate that it is feasible to detect the original source of text, achieving an accuracy rate of 96.86%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T17:38:44Z) - A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution,
and Characterization [13.44566185792894]
AI-generated text forensics is an emerging field addressing the challenges of LLM misuses.
We introduce a detailed taxonomy, focusing on three primary pillars: detection, attribution, and characterization.
We explore available resources for AI-generated text forensics research and discuss the evolving challenges and future directions of forensic systems in an AI era.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T09:39:13Z) - On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI [135.2754367149689]
We argue that current large-scale generative AI models do not sufficiently address several fundamental issues that hinder their widespread adoption across domains.
In this work, we aim to identify key unresolved challenges in modern generative AI paradigms that should be tackled to further enhance their capabilities, versatility, and reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T15:19:33Z) - Opening the Black-Box: A Systematic Review on Explainable AI in Remote Sensing [51.524108608250074]
Black-box machine learning approaches have become a dominant modeling paradigm for knowledge extraction in remote sensing.
We perform a systematic review to identify the key trends in the field and shed light on novel explainable AI approaches.
We also give a detailed outlook on the challenges and promising research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T13:19:58Z) - Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectors [57.7003399760813]
We explore advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) and their specialized variants, contributing to this field in several ways.
We uncover a significant correlation between topics and detection performance.
These investigations shed light on the adaptability and robustness of these detection methods across diverse topics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T10:53:53Z) - Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection:
A Survey [97.33926242130732]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses.
Despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs.
To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T18:11:32Z) - Watermarking Conditional Text Generation for AI Detection: Unveiling
Challenges and a Semantic-Aware Watermark Remedy [52.765898203824975]
We introduce a semantic-aware watermarking algorithm that considers the characteristics of conditional text generation and the input context.
Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method yields substantial improvements across various text generation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T20:24:22Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.