OntoChat: a Framework for Conversational Ontology Engineering using Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05921v2
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:13:24 GMT
- Title: OntoChat: a Framework for Conversational Ontology Engineering using Language Models
- Authors: Bohui Zhang, Valentina Anita Carriero, Katrin Schreiberhuber, Stefani Tsaneva, Lucía Sánchez González, Jongmo Kim, Jacopo de Berardinis,
- Abstract summary: We introduce textbfOntoChat, a framework for conversational engineering that supports requirement elicitation, analysis, and testing.
We evaluate OntoChat by replicating the engineering of the Music Meta Ontology, and collecting preliminary metrics on the effectiveness of each component from users.
- Score: 0.3141085922386211
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Ontology engineering (OE) in large projects poses a number of challenges arising from the heterogeneous backgrounds of the various stakeholders, domain experts, and their complex interactions with ontology designers. This multi-party interaction often creates systematic ambiguities and biases from the elicitation of ontology requirements, which directly affect the design, evaluation and may jeopardise the target reuse. Meanwhile, current OE methodologies strongly rely on manual activities (e.g., interviews, discussion pages). After collecting evidence on the most crucial OE activities, we introduce \textbf{OntoChat}, a framework for conversational ontology engineering that supports requirement elicitation, analysis, and testing. By interacting with a conversational agent, users can steer the creation of user stories and the extraction of competency questions, while receiving computational support to analyse the overall requirements and test early versions of the resulting ontologies. We evaluate OntoChat by replicating the engineering of the Music Meta Ontology, and collecting preliminary metrics on the effectiveness of each component from users. We release all code at https://github.com/King-s-Knowledge-Graph-Lab/OntoChat.
Related papers
- Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges.
We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow.
We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z) - "Is This It?": Towards Ecologically Valid Benchmarks for Situated Collaboration [16.25921668308458]
We develop benchmarks to assess the capabilities of large multimodal models for engaging in situated collaboration.
In contrast to existing benchmarks, in which question-answer pairs are generated post hoc over preexisting or synthetic datasets via templates, human annotators, or large language models, we propose and investigate an interactive system-driven approach.
We illustrate how the questions that arise are different in form and content from questions typically found in existing embodied question answering (EQA) benchmarks and discuss new real-world challenge problems brought to the fore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T12:41:23Z) - Improving Ontology Requirements Engineering with OntoChat and Participatory Prompting [3.3241053483599563]
ORE has primarily relied on manual methods, such as interviews and collaborative forums, to gather user requirements from domain experts.
Current OntoChat offers a framework for ORE that utilise large language models (LLMs) to streamline the process.
This study produces pre-defined prompt templates based on user queries, focusing on creating and refining personas, goals, scenarios, sample data, and data resources for user stories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T19:21:14Z) - BiosERC: Integrating Biography Speakers Supported by LLMs for ERC Tasks [2.9873893715462176]
This work introduces a novel framework named BiosERC, which investigates speaker characteristics in a conversation.
By employing Large Language Models (LLMs), we extract the "biographical information" of the speaker within a conversation.
Our proposed method achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on three famous benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T06:25:34Z) - Engineering Conversational Search Systems: A Review of Applications, Architectures, and Functional Components [4.262342157729123]
This study investigates the links between theoretical studies and technical implementations of conversational search systems.
We present a layered architecture framework and explain the core functions of conversational search systems.
We reflect on our findings in light of the rapid progress in large language models, discussing their capabilities, limitations, and directions for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T06:24:11Z) - ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations [21.23826888841565]
We introduce a large-scale dataset for proactive document retrieval that consists of over 2.8 million conversations.
We conduct crowdsourcing experiments to obtain high-quality and relatively complete relevance judgments.
We also collect annotations related to the parts of the conversation that are related to each document, enabling us to evaluate proactive retrieval systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T13:11:07Z) - 'What are you referring to?' Evaluating the Ability of Multi-Modal
Dialogue Models to Process Clarificational Exchanges [65.03196674816772]
Referential ambiguities arise in dialogue when a referring expression does not uniquely identify the intended referent for the addressee.
Addressees usually detect such ambiguities immediately and work with the speaker to repair it using meta-communicative, Clarification Exchanges (CE): a Clarification Request (CR) and a response.
Here, we argue that the ability to generate and respond to CRs imposes specific constraints on the architecture and objective functions of multi-modal, visually grounded dialogue models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-28T13:44:33Z) - Using Textual Interface to Align External Knowledge for End-to-End
Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems [53.38517204698343]
We propose a novel paradigm that uses a textual interface to align external knowledge and eliminate redundant processes.
We demonstrate our paradigm in practice through MultiWOZ-Remake, including an interactive textual interface built for the MultiWOZ database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T05:48:21Z) - Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP.
This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z) - KETOD: Knowledge-Enriched Task-Oriented Dialogue [77.59814785157877]
Existing studies in dialogue system research mostly treat task-oriented dialogue and chit-chat as separate domains.
We investigate how task-oriented dialogue and knowledge-grounded chit-chat can be effectively integrated into a single model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-11T16:01:03Z) - Conversations with Search Engines: SERP-based Conversational Response
Generation [77.1381159789032]
We create a suitable dataset, the Search as a Conversation (SaaC) dataset, for the development of pipelines for conversations with search engines.
We also develop a state-of-the-art pipeline for conversations with search engines, the Conversations with Search Engines (CaSE) using this dataset.
CaSE enhances the state-of-the-art by introducing a supporting token identification module and aprior-aware pointer generator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T13:07:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.