Monotone Individual Fairness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06812v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:32:56 GMT
• Title: Monotone Individual Fairness
• Authors: Yahav Bechavod
• Abstract summary: We revisit the problem of online learning with individual fairness, where an online learner strives to maximize predictive accuracy while ensuring similar individuals are treated similarly. We consider auditing schemes that are capable of aggregating feedback from any number of auditors. We present an oracle-efficient algorithm achieving an upper bound of $(mathcalO(T2/3+2b),mathcalO(T5/6-b))$ for regret, number of fairness violations, for $0leq b leq$.
• Score: 3.20902205123321
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We revisit the problem of online learning with individual fairness, where an online learner strives to maximize predictive accuracy while ensuring that similar individuals are treated similarly. We first extend the frameworks of Gillen et al. (2018); Bechavod et al. (2020), which rely on feedback from human auditors regarding fairness violations, as we consider auditing schemes that are capable of aggregating feedback from any number of auditors, using a rich class we term monotone aggregation functions. We then prove a characterization for such auditing schemes, practically reducing the analysis of auditing for individual fairness by multiple auditors to that of auditing by (instance-specific) single auditors. Using our generalized framework, we present an oracle-efficient algorithm achieving an upper bound frontier of $(\mathcal{O}(T^{1/2+2b}),\mathcal{O}(T^{3/4-b}))$ respectively for regret, number of fairness violations, for $0\leq b \leq 1/4$. We then study an online classification setting where label feedback is available for positively-predicted individuals only, and present an oracle-efficient algorithm achieving an upper bound frontier of $(\mathcal{O}(T^{2/3+2b}),\mathcal{O}(T^{5/6-b}))$ for regret, number of fairness violations, for $0\leq b \leq 1/6$. In both settings, our algorithms improve on the best known bounds for oracle-efficient algorithms. Furthermore, our algorithms offer significant improvements in computational efficiency, greatly reducing the number of required calls to an (offline) optimization oracle per round, to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\alpha^{-2})$ in the full information setting, and $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\alpha^{-2} + k^2T^{1/3})$ in the partial information setting, where $\alpha$ is the sensitivity for reporting fairness violations, and $k$ is the number of individuals in a round.

Related papers

• Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass Classification [73.17969992976501]
  We study multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback, where inputs are classified into one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is limited to whether or not the predicted labels are correct. Our main contribution is in designing a novel learning algorithm for the agnostic $(varepsilon,delta)$PAC version of the problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:54:04Z)
• Perturb-and-Project: Differentially Private Similarities and Marginals [73.98880839337873]
  We revisit the input perturbations framework for differential privacy where noise is added to the input $Ain mathcalS$. We first design novel efficient algorithms to privately release pair-wise cosine similarities. We derive a novel algorithm to compute $k$-way marginal queries over $n$ features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T12:07:16Z)
• Federated Combinatorial Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits [79.1700188160944]
  This paper introduces a federated learning framework tailored for online optimization with bandit. In this setting, agents subsets of arms, observe noisy rewards for these subsets without accessing individual arm information, and can cooperate and share information at specific intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T17:40:09Z)
• Fair Active Ranking from Pairwise Preferences [6.102498508368527]
  Given a set of $n$ items that belong to disjoint groups, our goal is to find an $(epsilon, delta)$-PACF-Ranking according to a fair objective function that we propose. We present both group-blind and group-aware algorithms and analyze their sample parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T18:09:48Z)
• Provably Efficient High-Dimensional Bandit Learning with Batched Feedbacks [93.00280593719513]
  We study high-dimensional multi-armed contextual bandits with batched feedback where the $T$ steps of online interactions are divided into $L$ batches. In specific, each batch collects data according to a policy that depends on previous batches and the rewards are revealed only at the end of the batch. Our algorithm achieves regret bounds comparable to those in fully sequential setting with only $mathcalO( log T)$ batches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T06:06:54Z)
• Certified Multi-Fidelity Zeroth-Order Optimization [4.450536872346658]
  We consider the problem of multi-fidelity zeroth-order optimization, where one can evaluate a function $f$ at various approximation levels. We propose a certified variant of the MFDOO algorithm and derive a bound on its cost complexity for any Lipschitz function $f$. We also prove an $f$-dependent lower bound showing that this algorithm has a near-optimal cost complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T07:20:37Z)
• Oracle Efficient Online Multicalibration and Omniprediction [15.476402844435704]
  We study omniprediction in the online adversarial setting. We develop a new online multicalibration algorithm that is well defined for infinite benchmark classes $F$. We show upper and lower bounds on the extent to which our rates can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T06:34:32Z)
• Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Surprise Bound [66.15308700413814]
  We propose a provably efficient reinforcement learning algorithm (both computationally and statistically) with general value function approximations. Our algorithm achieves reasonable regret bounds when applied to both the linear setting and the sparse high-dimensional linear setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T20:21:25Z)
• Individually Fair Learning with One-Sided Feedback [15.713330010191092]
  We consider an online learning problem with one-sided feedback, in which the learner is able to observe the true label only for positively predicted instances. On each round, $k$ instances arrive and receive classification outcomes according to a randomized policy deployed by the learner. We then construct an efficient reduction from our problem of online learning with one-sided feedback and a panel reporting fairness violations to the contextual semi-bandit problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T12:59:03Z)
• Oracle-Efficient Online Learning for Beyond Worst-Case Adversaries [29.598518028635716]
  We study oracle-efficient algorithms for beyond worst-case analysis of online learning. For the smoothed analysis setting, our results give the first oracle-efficient algorithm for online learning with smoothed adversaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T09:49:40Z)
• Revisiting Modified Greedy Algorithm for Monotone Submodular Maximization with a Knapsack Constraint [75.85952446237599]
  We show that a modified greedy algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of $0.305$. We derive a data-dependent upper bound on the optimum. It can also be used to significantly improve the efficiency of such algorithms as branch and bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T15:40:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.