Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT on Student Interactions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07082v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:18:18 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT on Student Interactions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
• Authors: Han Kyul Kim, Shriniwas Nayak, Aleyeh Roknaldin, Xiaoci Zhang, Marlon Twyman, Stephen Lu
• Abstract summary: This paper takes an initial step in exploring the applicability of ChatGPT in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Using statistical analysis, we validate the shifts in student interactions during an asynchronous group brainstorming session by introducing ChatGPT as an instantaneous question-answering agent.
• Score: 1.5961625979922607
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing popularity of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, has sparked both enthusiasm and caution among practitioners and researchers in education. To effectively harness the full potential of ChatGPT in educational contexts, it is crucial to analyze its impact and suitability for different educational purposes. This paper takes an initial step in exploring the applicability of ChatGPT in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Using statistical analysis, we validate the shifts in student interactions during an asynchronous group brainstorming session by introducing ChatGPT as an instantaneous question-answering agent.

Related papers

• The Future of Learning: Large Language Models through the Lens of Students [20.64319102112755]
  Students grapple with the dilemma of utilizing ChatGPT's efficiency for learning and information seeking. Students perceive ChatGPT as being more "human-like" compared to traditional AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T16:40:37Z)
• StuGPTViz: A Visual Analytics Approach to Understand Student-ChatGPT Interactions [35.927734064685886]
  We present a visual analytics system, StuGPTViz, that tracks and compares temporal patterns in student prompts and the quality of ChatGPT's responses at multiple scales. The results confirmed StuGPTViz's capacity to enhance educators' insights into the pedagogical value of ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T09:20:44Z)
• Integrating AI in College Education: Positive yet Mixed Experiences with ChatGPT [11.282878158641967]
  We developed a ChatGPT-based teaching application and integrated it into our undergraduate medical imaging course in the Spring 2024 semester. This study investigates the use of ChatGPT throughout a semester-long trial, providing insights into students' engagement, perception, and the overall educational effectiveness of the technology. The findings indicate that ChatGPT offers significant advantages such as improved information access and increased interactivity, but its adoption is accompanied by concerns about the accuracy of the information provided.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T10:44:34Z)
• Economic and Financial Learning with Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study on ChatGPT [0.05152756192881158]
  This study explores ChatGPT's potential as an educational tool, focusing on user perceptions, experiences and learning outcomes. The study reveals a notable positive shift in perceptions after exposure, underscoring the efficacy of ChatGPT. However, challenges such as prompting effectiveness and information accuracy emerged as pivotal concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T11:55:43Z)
• Integrating ChatGPT in a Computer Science Course: Students Perceptions and Suggestions [0.0]
  This experience report explores students' perceptions and suggestions for integrating ChatGPT in a computer science course. Findings show the importance of carefully balancing using ChatGPT in computer science courses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T10:48:34Z)
• Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
  We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
• ChatGPT Evaluation on Sentence Level Relations: A Focus on Temporal, Causal, and Discourse Relations [52.26802326949116]
  We quantitatively evaluate the performance of ChatGPT, an interactive large language model, on inter-sentential relations. ChatGPT exhibits exceptional proficiency in detecting and reasoning about causal relations. It is capable of identifying the majority of discourse relations with existing explicit discourse connectives, but the implicit discourse relation remains a formidable challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T13:14:36Z)
• A Preliminary Evaluation of ChatGPT for Zero-shot Dialogue Understanding [55.37338324658501]
  Zero-shot dialogue understanding aims to enable dialogue to track the user's needs without any training data. In this work, we investigate the understanding ability of ChatGPT for zero-shot dialogue understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T15:28:36Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
  ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.