Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08944v1
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:21:20 GMT
- Title: Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligence
- Authors: Valerio Capraro, Roberto Di Paolo, Matjaz Perc, Veronica Pizziol,
- Abstract summary: We show that sentiment analysis can explain human behaviour beyond economic outcomes.
Our meta-analysis shows that sentiment analysis can explain human behaviour beyond economic outcomes.
We hope this work sets the stage for a novel game theoretical approach that emphasizes the importance of language in human decisions.
- Score: 0.6187270874122921
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Understanding human behaviour in decision problems and strategic interactions has wide-ranging applications in economics, psychology, and artificial intelligence. Game theory offers a robust foundation for this understanding, based on the idea that individuals aim to maximize a utility function. However, the exact factors influencing strategy choices remain elusive. While traditional models try to explain human behaviour as a function of the outcomes of available actions, recent experimental research reveals that linguistic content significantly impacts decision-making, thus prompting a paradigm shift from outcome-based to language-based utility functions. This shift is more urgent than ever, given the advancement of generative AI, which has the potential to support humans in making critical decisions through language-based interactions. We propose sentiment analysis as a fundamental tool for this shift and take an initial step by analyzing 61 experimental instructions from the dictator game, an economic game capturing the balance between self-interest and the interest of others, which is at the core of many social interactions. Our meta-analysis shows that sentiment analysis can explain human behaviour beyond economic outcomes. We discuss future research directions. We hope this work sets the stage for a novel game theoretical approach that emphasizes the importance of language in human decisions.
Related papers
- Capturing the Complexity of Human Strategic Decision-Making with Machine Learning [4.308322597847064]
We conduct the largest study to date of strategic decision-making in the context of initial play in two-player matrix games.
We show that a deep neural network trained on these data predicts people's choices better than leading theories of strategic behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T00:39:42Z) - From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for
Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions.
Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z) - The Neuro-Symbolic Inverse Planning Engine (NIPE): Modeling
Probabilistic Social Inferences from Linguistic Inputs [50.32802502923367]
We study the process of language driving and influencing social reasoning in a probabilistic goal inference domain.
We propose a neuro-symbolic model that carries out goal inference from linguistic inputs of agent scenarios.
Our model closely matches human response patterns and better predicts human judgements than using an LLM alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-25T19:38:01Z) - Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology.
We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table.
It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z) - Language Cognition and Language Computation -- Human and Machine
Language Understanding [51.56546543716759]
Language understanding is a key scientific issue in the fields of cognitive and computer science.
Can a combination of the disciplines offer new insights for building intelligent language models?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-12T02:37:00Z) - From Outcome-Based to Language-Based Preferences [13.05235037907183]
We review the literature on models that try to explain human behavior in social interactions described by normal-form games with monetary payoffs.
We focus on the growing body of research showing that people react to the language in which actions are described, especially when it activates moral concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-15T05:11:58Z) - AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning [60.35621718321559]
Intuitive psychology is the ability to reason about hidden mental variables that drive observable actions.
Despite recent interest in machine agents that reason about other agents, it is not clear if such agents learn or hold the core psychology principles that drive human reasoning.
We present a benchmark consisting of procedurally generated 3D animations, AGENT, structured around four scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-24T14:58:23Z) - Cognitive Perspectives on Context-based Decisions and Explanations [0.0]
We show that the Contextual Importance and Utility method for XAI share an overlap with the current new wave of action-oriented predictive representational structures.
This has an influencing effect on explainable AI, where the goal is to provide explanations of computer decision-making for a human audience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-25T15:49:52Z) - Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI)
This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.