Schema-Aware Multi-Task Learning for Complex Text-to-SQL
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09706v1
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:13:37 GMT
- Title: Schema-Aware Multi-Task Learning for Complex Text-to-SQL
- Authors: Yangjun Wu, Han Wang,
- Abstract summary: We present a schema-aware multi-task learning framework (named MT) for complicatedsql queries.
Specifically, we design a schema linking discriminator module to distinguish the valid question-schema linkings.
On the decoder side, we define 6-type relationships to describe the connections between tables and columns.
- Score: 4.913409359995421
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Conventional text-to-SQL parsers are not good at synthesizing complex SQL queries that involve multiple tables or columns, due to the challenges inherent in identifying the correct schema items and performing accurate alignment between question and schema items. To address the above issue, we present a schema-aware multi-task learning framework (named MTSQL) for complicated SQL queries. Specifically, we design a schema linking discriminator module to distinguish the valid question-schema linkings, which explicitly instructs the encoder by distinctive linking relations to enhance the alignment quality. On the decoder side, we define 6-type relationships to describe the connections between tables and columns (e.g., WHERE_TC), and introduce an operator-centric triple extractor to recognize those associated schema items with the predefined relationship. Also, we establish a rule set of grammar constraints via the predicted triples to filter the proper SQL operators and schema items during the SQL generation. On Spider, a cross-domain challenging text-to-SQL benchmark, experimental results indicate that MTSQL is more effective than baselines, especially in extremely hard scenarios. Moreover, further analyses verify that our approach leads to promising improvements for complicated SQL queries.
Related papers
- RSL-SQL: Robust Schema Linking in Text-to-SQL Generation [51.00761167842468]
We propose a novel framework called RSL- that combines bidirectional schema linking, contextual information augmentation, binary selection strategy, and multi-turn self-correction.
benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves SOTA execution accuracy among open-source solutions, with 67.2% on BIRD and 87.9% on GPT-4ocorrection.
Our approach outperforms a series of GPT-4 based Text-to-Seek systems when adopting DeepSeek (much cheaper) with same intact prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T16:22:26Z) - The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models [0.9149661171430259]
We revisit schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs)
We find empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.
Instead of filtering contextual information, we highlight techniques such as augmentation, selection, and correction, and adopt them to improve the accuracy of our Text-to-BIRD pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T17:59:04Z) - SQL-to-Schema Enhances Schema Linking in Text-to-SQL [15.6857201570992]
In text-to-speech methods, there is a need to filter out unnecessary tables and columns.
Previous approaches have involved sorting tables and columns based on their relevance to the question.
We propose an inventive schema linking method in two steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-15T12:22:48Z) - SQL-PaLM: Improved Large Language Model Adaptation for Text-to-SQL (extended) [53.95151604061761]
This paper introduces the framework for enhancing Text-to- filtering using large language models (LLMs)
With few-shot prompting, we explore the effectiveness of consistency decoding with execution-based error analyses.
With instruction fine-tuning, we delve deep in understanding the critical paradigms that influence the performance of tuned LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T21:39:05Z) - Prompting GPT-3.5 for Text-to-SQL with De-semanticization and Skeleton
Retrieval [17.747079214502673]
Text-to- is a task that converts a natural language question into a structured query language () to retrieve information from a database.
In this paper, we propose an LLM-based framework for Text-to- which retrieves helpful demonstration examples to prompt LLMs.
We design a de-semanticization mechanism that extracts question skeletons, allowing us to retrieve similar examples based on their structural similarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-26T06:02:01Z) - Improving Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing with Fine-grained Query
Understanding [84.04706075621013]
We present a general-purpose, modular neural semantic parsing framework based on token-level fine-grained query understanding.
Our framework consists of three modules: named entity recognizer (NER), neural entity linker (NEL) and neural entity linker (NSP)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-28T21:00:30Z) - Semantic Enhanced Text-to-SQL Parsing via Iteratively Learning Schema
Linking Graph [6.13728903057727]
The generalizability to new databases is of vital importance to Text-to- systems which aim to parse human utterances intosql statements.
In this paper, we propose a framework named IS ESL to iteratively build a enhanced semantic schema-linking graph between question tokens and database schemas.
Extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that IS ESL could consistently outperform the baselines and further investigations show its generalizability and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-08T03:59:33Z) - Proton: Probing Schema Linking Information from Pre-trained Language
Models for Text-to-SQL Parsing [66.55478402233399]
We propose a framework to elicit relational structures via a probing procedure based on Poincar'e distance metric.
Compared with commonly-used rule-based methods for schema linking, we found that probing relations can robustly capture semantic correspondences.
Our framework sets new state-of-the-art performance on three benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-28T14:05:25Z) - S$^2$SQL: Injecting Syntax to Question-Schema Interaction Graph Encoder
for Text-to-SQL Parsers [66.78665327694625]
We propose S$2$, injecting Syntax to question- encoder graph for Text-to- relational parsing.
We also employ the decoupling constraint to induce diverse edge embedding, which further improves the network's performance.
Experiments on the Spider and robustness setting Spider-Syn demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms all existing methods when pre-training models are used.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T09:49:15Z) - Weakly Supervised Text-to-SQL Parsing through Question Decomposition [53.22128541030441]
We take advantage of the recently proposed question meaning representation called QDMR.
Given questions, their QDMR structures (annotated by non-experts or automatically predicted) and the answers, we are able to automatically synthesizesql queries.
Our results show that the weakly supervised models perform competitively with those trained on NL- benchmark data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-12T20:02:42Z) - A Tale of Two Linkings: Dynamically Gating between Schema Linking and
Structural Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsing [25.81069211061945]
In Text-to- semantic parsing, selecting the correct entities for the generatedsql query is both crucial and challenging.
We two linking processes to address this challenge: schema linking which links explicit NL mentions to the database and structural linking which links the entities in the outputsql with their structural relationships in the database schema.
Integrating the proposed method with two graph neural network-based semantics together with BERT representations demonstrates substantial gains in parsing accuracy on the challenging Spider dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-30T17:32:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.