Linguistic Structure Induction from Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09714v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 16:54:49 GMT
• Title: Linguistic Structure Induction from Language Models
• Authors: Omar Momen,
• Abstract summary: This thesis focuses on producing constituency and dependency structures from Language Models (LMs) in an unsupervised setting. I present a detailed study on StructFormer (SF) which retrofits a transformer architecture with a encoder network to produce constituency and dependency structures. I present six experiments to analyze and address this field's challenges.
• Score: 1.8130068086063336
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Linear sequences of words are implicitly represented in our brains by hierarchical structures that organize the composition of words in sentences. Linguists formalize different frameworks to model this hierarchy; two of the most common syntactic frameworks are Constituency and Dependency. Constituency represents sentences as nested groups of phrases, while dependency represents a sentence by assigning relations between its words. Recently, the pursuit of intelligent machines has produced Language Models (LMs) capable of solving many language tasks with a human-level performance. Many studies now question whether LMs implicitly represent syntactic hierarchies. This thesis focuses on producing constituency and dependency structures from LMs in an unsupervised setting. I review the critical methods in this field and highlight a line of work that utilizes a numerical representation for binary constituency trees (Syntactic Distance). I present a detailed study on StructFormer (SF) (Shen et al., 2021), which retrofits a transformer encoder architecture with a parser network to produce constituency and dependency structures. I present six experiments to analyze and address this field's challenges; experiments include investigating the effect of repositioning the parser network within the SF architecture, evaluating subword-based induced trees, and benchmarking the models developed in the thesis experiments on linguistic tasks. Models benchmarking is performed by participating in the BabyLM challenge, published at CoNLL 2023 (Momen et al., 2023). The results of this thesis encourage further development in the direction of retrofitting transformer-based models to induce syntactic structures, supported by the acceptable performance of SF in different experimental settings and the observed limitations that require innovative solutions to advance the state of syntactic structure induction.

Related papers

• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Unsupervised Chunking with Hierarchical RNN [62.15060807493364]
  This paper introduces an unsupervised approach to chunking, a syntactic task that involves grouping words in a non-hierarchical manner. We present a two-layer Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Network (HRNN) designed to model word-to-chunk and chunk-to-sentence compositions. Experiments on the CoNLL-2000 dataset reveal a notable improvement over existing unsupervised methods, enhancing phrase F1 score by up to 6 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-10T02:55:12Z)
• Unifying Structure Reasoning and Language Model Pre-training for Complex Reasoning [26.811507121199323]
  This paper proposes a unified learning framework that combines explicit structure reasoning and language pre-training to endow PLMs with the structure reasoning skill. It first identifies several elementary structures within contexts to construct structured queries and performs step-by-step reasoning along the queries to identify the answer entity. Experimental results on four datasets demonstrate that the proposed model achieves significant improvements in complex reasoning tasks involving diverse structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-21T08:18:11Z)
• Autoregressive Structured Prediction with Language Models [73.11519625765301]
  We describe an approach to model structures as sequences of actions in an autoregressive manner with PLMs. Our approach achieves the new state-of-the-art on all the structured prediction tasks we looked at.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T13:27:26Z)
• Model Criticism for Long-Form Text Generation [113.13900836015122]
  We apply a statistical tool, model criticism in latent space, to evaluate the high-level structure of generated text. We perform experiments on three representative aspects of high-level discourse -- coherence, coreference, and topicality. We find that transformer-based language models are able to capture topical structures but have a harder time maintaining structural coherence or modeling coreference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T04:35:58Z)
• Schr\"odinger's Tree -- On Syntax and Neural Language Models [10.296219074343785]
  Language models have emerged as NLP's workhorse, displaying increasingly fluent generation capabilities. We observe a lack of clarity across numerous dimensions, which influences the hypotheses that researchers form. We outline the implications of the different types of research questions exhibited in studies on syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-17T18:25:23Z)
• Syntactic Perturbations Reveal Representational Correlates of Hierarchical Phrase Structure in Pretrained Language Models [22.43510769150502]
  It is not entirely clear what aspects of sentence-level syntax are captured by vector-based language representations. We show that Transformers build sensitivity to larger parts of the sentence along their layers, and that hierarchical phrase structure plays a role in this process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T16:30:31Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• StructFormer: Joint Unsupervised Induction of Dependency and Constituency Structure from Masked Language Modeling [45.96663013609177]
  We introduce a novel model, StructFormer, that can induce dependency and constituency structure at the same time. We integrate the induced dependency relations into the transformer, in a differentiable manner, through a novel dependency-constrained self-attention mechanism. Experimental results show that our model can achieve strong results on unsupervised constituency parsing, unsupervised dependency parsing, and masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T21:54:51Z)
• A Self-supervised Representation Learning of Sentence Structure for Authorship Attribution [3.5991811164452923]
  We propose a self-supervised framework for learning structural representations of sentences. We evaluate the learned structural representations of sentences using different probing tasks, and subsequently utilize them in the authorship attribution task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T02:57:10Z)
• Unsupervised Distillation of Syntactic Information from Contextualized Word Representations [62.230491683411536]
  We tackle the task of unsupervised disentanglement between semantics and structure in neural language representations. To this end, we automatically generate groups of sentences which are structurally similar but semantically different. We demonstrate that our transformation clusters vectors in space by structural properties, rather than by lexical semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-11T15:13:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.