Evaluating Large Language Models as Generative User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09738v4
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 23:53:01 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Large Language Models as Generative User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation
• Authors: Se-eun Yoon, Zhankui He, Jessica Maria Echterhoff, Julian McAuley,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new protocol to measure the degree to which language models can accurately emulate human behavior in conversational recommendation. We demonstrate these tasks effectively reveal deviations of language models from human behavior, and offer insights on how to reduce the deviations with model selection and prompting strategies.
• Score: 20.171574438536673
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Synthetic users are cost-effective proxies for real users in the evaluation of conversational recommender systems. Large language models show promise in simulating human-like behavior, raising the question of their ability to represent a diverse population of users. We introduce a new protocol to measure the degree to which language models can accurately emulate human behavior in conversational recommendation. This protocol is comprised of five tasks, each designed to evaluate a key property that a synthetic user should exhibit: choosing which items to talk about, expressing binary preferences, expressing open-ended preferences, requesting recommendations, and giving feedback. Through evaluation of baseline simulators, we demonstrate these tasks effectively reveal deviations of language models from human behavior, and offer insights on how to reduce the deviations with model selection and prompting strategies.

Related papers

• PingPong: A Benchmark for Role-Playing Language Models with User Emulation and Multi-Model Evaluation [0.0]
  We introduce a novel benchmark for evaluating the role-playing capabilities of language models. The framework consists of three main components: a player model assuming a specific character role, an interrogator model simulating user behavior, and a judge model evaluating conversation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T19:00:44Z)
• DiverseDialogue: A Methodology for Designing Chatbots with Human-Like Diversity [5.388338680646657]
  We show that GPT-4o mini, when used as simulated human participants, systematically differ from those between actual humans across multiple linguistic features. We propose an approach that automatically generates prompts for user simulations by incorporating features derived from real human interactions. Our method of prompt optimization, tailored to target specific linguistic features, shows significant improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T21:33:58Z)
• Learning Phonotactics from Linguistic Informants [54.086544221761486]
  Our model iteratively selects or synthesizes a data-point according to one of a range of information-theoretic policies. We find that the information-theoretic policies that our model uses to select items to query the informant achieve sample efficiency comparable to, or greater than, fully supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T00:18:56Z)
• Human Learning by Model Feedback: The Dynamics of Iterative Prompting with Midjourney [28.39697076030535]
  This paper analyzes the dynamics of the user prompts along such iterations. We show that prompts predictably converge toward specific traits along these iterations. The possibility that users adapt to the model's preference raises concerns about reusing user data for further training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T19:28:52Z)
• Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Conversational Recommenders [52.57230221644014]
  We present empirical studies on conversational recommendation tasks using representative large language models in a zero-shot setting. We construct a new dataset of recommendation-related conversations by scraping a popular discussion website. We observe that even without fine-tuning, large language models can outperform existing fine-tuned conversational recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T15:29:45Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [115.7508325840751]
  The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential to develop more powerful conversational recommender systems (CRSs) In this paper, we embark on an investigation into the utilization of ChatGPT for conversational recommendation, revealing the inadequacy of the existing evaluation protocol. We propose an interactive Evaluation approach based on LLMs named iEvaLM that harnesses LLM-based user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:12:43Z)
• Bridging the Gap: A Survey on Integrating (Human) Feedback for Natural Language Generation [68.9440575276396]
  This survey aims to provide an overview of the recent research that has leveraged human feedback to improve natural language generation. First, we introduce an encompassing formalization of feedback, and identify and organize existing research into a taxonomy following this formalization. Second, we discuss how feedback can be described by its format and objective, and cover the two approaches proposed to use feedback (either for training or decoding): directly using the feedback or training feedback models. Third, we provide an overview of the nascent field of AI feedback, which exploits large language models to make judgments based on a set of principles and minimize the need for
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T17:36:06Z)
• Chain of Hindsight Aligns Language Models with Feedback [62.68665658130472]
  We propose a novel technique, Chain of Hindsight, that is easy to optimize and can learn from any form of feedback, regardless of its polarity. We convert all types of feedback into sequences of sentences, which are then used to fine-tune the model. By doing so, the model is trained to generate outputs based on feedback, while learning to identify and correct negative attributes or errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T10:28:16Z)
• Training Language Models with Natural Language Feedback [51.36137482891037]
  We learn from language feedback on model outputs using a three-step learning algorithm. In synthetic experiments, we first evaluate whether language models accurately incorporate feedback to produce refinements. Using only 100 samples of human-written feedback, our learning algorithm finetunes a GPT-3 model to roughly human-level summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T15:06:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.