Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfare

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10570v2
• Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:52:20 GMT
• Title: Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfare
• Authors: Tao Li, Quanyan Zhu,
• Abstract summary: We are currently facing unprecedented cyber warfare with the rapid evolution of tactics, increasing asymmetry of intelligence, and the growing accessibility of hacking tools. This chapter aims to highlight the pivotal role of game-theoretic models and foundation models (FMs) in analyzing, designing, and implementing cyber deception tactics.
• Score: 16.378537388284027
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We are currently facing unprecedented cyber warfare with the rapid evolution of tactics, increasing asymmetry of intelligence, and the growing accessibility of hacking tools. In this landscape, cyber deception emerges as a critical component of our defense strategy against increasingly sophisticated attacks. This chapter aims to highlight the pivotal role of game-theoretic models and foundation models (FMs) in analyzing, designing, and implementing cyber deception tactics. Game models (GMs) serve as a foundational framework for modeling diverse adversarial interactions, allowing us to encapsulate both adversarial knowledge and domain-specific insights. Meanwhile, FMs serve as the building blocks for creating tailored machine learning models suited to given applications. By leveraging the synergy between GMs and FMs, we can advance proactive and automated cyber defense mechanisms by not only securing our networks against attacks but also enhancing their resilience against well-planned operations. This chapter discusses the games at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels of warfare, delves into the symbiotic relationship between these methodologies, and explores relevant applications where such a framework can make a substantial impact in cybersecurity. The chapter discusses the promising direction of the multi-agent neurosymbolic conjectural learning (MANSCOL), which allows the defender to predict adversarial behaviors, design adaptive defensive deception tactics, and synthesize knowledge for the operational level synthesis and adaptation. FMs serve as pivotal tools across various functions for MANSCOL, including reinforcement learning, knowledge assimilation, formation of conjectures, and contextual representation. This chapter concludes with a discussion of the challenges associated with FMs and their application in the domain of cybersecurity.

Related papers

• Simulation of Multi-Stage Attack and Defense Mechanisms in Smart Grids [2.0766068042442174]
  We introduce a simulation environment that replicates the power grid's infrastructure and communication dynamics. The framework generates diverse, realistic attack data to train machine learning algorithms for detecting and mitigating cyber threats. It also provides a controlled, flexible platform to evaluate emerging security technologies, including advanced decision support systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T07:07:17Z)
• SoK: Unifying Cybersecurity and Cybersafety of Multimodal Foundation Models with an Information Theory Approach [58.93030774141753]
  Multimodal foundation models (MFMs) represent a significant advancement in artificial intelligence. This paper conceptualizes cybersafety and cybersecurity in the context of multimodal learning. We present a comprehensive Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) to unify these concepts in MFMs, identifying key threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T23:06:20Z)
• Hierarchical Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Network Defense [7.967738380932909]
  We propose a hierarchical Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) architecture that decomposes the cyber defense task into specific sub-tasks like network investigation and host recovery. Our approach involves training sub-policies for each sub-task using PPO enhanced with domain expertise. These sub-policies are then leveraged by a master defense policy that coordinates their selection to solve complex network defense tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T18:35:05Z)
• The Malware as a Service ecosystem [5.973995274784383]
  The study emphasises the profound challenges MaaS poses to traditional cybersecurity defences. There is a call for a paradigm shift in defensive strategies, advocating for dynamic analysis, behavioural detection, and the integration of AI and machine learning techniques. The ultimate goal is to aid in developing more effective strategies for combating the spread of commoditised malware threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T08:25:12Z)
• Foundations of Cyber Resilience: The Confluence of Game, Control, and Learning Theories [15.764094200832071]
  Cyber resilience focuses on preparation, response, and recovery from cyber threats that are challenging to prevent. Game theory, control theory, and learning theories are three major pillars for the design of cyber resilience mechanisms. This chapter presents various theoretical paradigms, including dynamic asymmetric games, moving horizon control, conjectural learning, and meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:02:21Z)
• Mutual-modality Adversarial Attack with Semantic Perturbation [81.66172089175346]
  We propose a novel approach that generates adversarial attacks in a mutual-modality optimization scheme. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art attack methods and can be readily deployed as a plug-and-play solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T05:06:01Z)
• Cyber Sentinel: Exploring Conversational Agents in Streamlining Security Tasks with GPT-4 [0.08192907805418582]
  This paper introduces Cyber Sentinel, an innovative task-oriented cybersecurity dialogue system. It embodies the fusion of artificial intelligence, cybersecurity domain expertise, and real-time data analysis to combat the multifaceted challenges posed by cyber adversaries. Our work is a novel approach to task-oriented dialogue systems, leveraging the power of chaining GPT-4 models combined with prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:18:33Z)
• Designing an attack-defense game: how to increase robustness of financial transaction models via a competition [69.08339915577206]
  Given the escalating risks of malicious attacks in the finance sector, understanding adversarial strategies and robust defense mechanisms for machine learning models is critical. We aim to investigate the current state and dynamics of adversarial attacks and defenses for neural network models that use sequential financial data as the input. We have designed a competition that allows realistic and detailed investigation of problems in modern financial transaction data. The participants compete directly against each other, so possible attacks and defenses are examined in close-to-real-life conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T12:53:09Z)
• Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
  We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers. We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions. We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Feedback-Enabled Cyber Resilience [24.92055101652206]
  Cyber resilience provides a new security paradigm that complements inadequate protection with resilience mechanisms. A Cyber-Resilient Mechanism ( CRM) adapts to the known or zero-day threats and uncertainties in real-time. We review the literature on RL for cyber resiliency and discuss the cyber-resilient defenses against three major types of vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T01:08:45Z)
• The Feasibility and Inevitability of Stealth Attacks [63.14766152741211]
  We study new adversarial perturbations that enable an attacker to gain control over decisions in generic Artificial Intelligence systems. In contrast to adversarial data modification, the attack mechanism we consider here involves alterations to the AI system itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-26T10:50:07Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
  This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques. It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.