Semisupervised score based matching algorithm to evaluate the effect of public health interventions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12367v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:24:16 GMT
• Title: Semisupervised score based matching algorithm to evaluate the effect of public health interventions
• Authors: Hongzhe Zhang, Jiasheng Shi, Jing Huang,
• Abstract summary: In one-to-one matching algorithms, a large number of "pairs" to be matched could mean both the information from a large sample and a large number of tasks. We propose a novel one-to-one matching algorithm based on a quadratic score function $S_beta(x_i,x_j)= betaT (x_i-x_j)(x_i-x_j)T beta$.
• Score: 3.221788913179251
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multivariate matching algorithms "pair" similar study units in an observational study to remove potential bias and confounding effects caused by the absence of randomizations. In one-to-one multivariate matching algorithms, a large number of "pairs" to be matched could mean both the information from a large sample and a large number of tasks, and therefore, to best match the pairs, such a matching algorithm with efficiency and comparatively limited auxiliary matching knowledge provided through a "training" set of paired units by domain experts, is practically intriguing. We proposed a novel one-to-one matching algorithm based on a quadratic score function $S_{\beta}(x_i,x_j)= \beta^T (x_i-x_j)(x_i-x_j)^T \beta$. The weights $\beta$, which can be interpreted as a variable importance measure, are designed to minimize the score difference between paired training units while maximizing the score difference between unpaired training units. Further, in the typical but intricate case where the training set is much smaller than the unpaired set, we propose a \underline{s}emisupervised \underline{c}ompanion \underline{o}ne-\underline{t}o-\underline{o}ne \underline{m}atching \underline{a}lgorithm (SCOTOMA) that makes the best use of the unpaired units. The proposed weight estimator is proved to be consistent when the truth matching criterion is indeed the quadratic score function. When the model assumptions are violated, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithm still outperforms some popular competing matching algorithms through a series of simulations. We applied the proposed algorithm to a real-world study to investigate the effect of in-person schooling on community Covid-19 transmission rate for policy making purpose.

Related papers

• A Novel Ranking Scheme for the Performance Analysis of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms using the Principles of Severity [9.310464457958844]
  We provide a novel ranking scheme to rank the algorithms over multiple single-objective optimization problems. The results of the algorithms are compared using a robust bootstrapping-based hypothesis testing procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T19:35:34Z)
• Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
  Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice. We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z)
• Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustment [54.179859639868646]
  We propose a model agnostic post-processing framework xOrder for achieving fairness in bipartite ranking. xOrder is compatible with various classification models and ranking fairness metrics, including supervised and unsupervised fairness metrics. We evaluate our proposed algorithm on four benchmark data sets and two real-world patient electronic health record repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T07:42:44Z)
• Optimal Clustering with Bandit Feedback [57.672609011609886]
  This paper considers the problem of online clustering with bandit feedback. It includes a novel stopping rule for sequential testing that circumvents the need to solve any NP-hard weighted clustering problem as its subroutines. We show through extensive simulations on synthetic and real-world datasets that BOC's performance matches the lower boundally, and significantly outperforms a non-adaptive baseline algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T06:05:05Z)
• Deep Probabilistic Graph Matching [72.6690550634166]
  We propose a deep learning-based graph matching framework that works for the original QAP without compromising on the matching constraints. The proposed method is evaluated on three popularly tested benchmarks (Pascal VOC, Willow Object and SPair-71k) and it outperforms all previous state-of-the-arts on all benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T13:37:27Z)
• Improved Algorithms for Agnostic Pool-based Active Classification [20.12178157010804]
  We consider active learning for binary classification in the agnostic pool-based setting. Our algorithm is superior to state of the art active learning algorithms on image classification datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T18:24:30Z)
• An Empirical Process Approach to the Union Bound: Practical Algorithms for Combinatorial and Linear Bandits [34.06611065493047]
  This paper proposes near-optimal algorithms for the pure-exploration linear bandit problem in the fixed confidence and fixed budget settings. We provide an algorithm whose sample complexity scales with the geometry of the instance and avoids an explicit union bound over the number of arms. We also propose the first algorithm for linear bandits in the the fixed budget setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T00:56:33Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)
• Ranking a set of objects: a graph based least-square approach [70.7866286425868]
  We consider the problem of ranking $N$ objects starting from a set of noisy pairwise comparisons provided by a crowd of equal workers. We propose a class of non-adaptive ranking algorithms that rely on a least-squares intrinsic optimization criterion for the estimation of qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T16:19:09Z)
• Learning Sparse Classifiers: Continuous and Mixed Integer Optimization Perspectives [10.291482850329892]
  Mixed integer programming (MIP) can be used to solve (to optimality) $ell_0$-regularized regression problems. We propose two classes of scalable algorithms: an exact algorithm that can handlepapprox 50,000$ features in a few minutes, and approximate algorithms that can address instances with $papprox6$. In addition, we present new estimation error bounds for $ell$-regularizeds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-17T18:47:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.