RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13031v2
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:56:13 GMT
- Title: RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content
- Authors: Zhuowen Yuan, Zidi Xiong, Yi Zeng, Ning Yu, Ruoxi Jia, Dawn Song, Bo Li,
- Abstract summary: Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks.
This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
- Score: 62.685566387625975
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities across various tasks in different domains. However, the emergence of biases and the potential for generating harmful content in LLMs, particularly under malicious inputs, pose significant challenges. Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks. This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently and effectively moderate harmful and unsafe inputs and outputs for LLMs. By employing a multi-faceted approach that includes energy-based training data augmentation through Langevin dynamics, optimizing a safe suffix for inputs via minimax optimization, and integrating a fusion-based model combining robust KNN with LLMs based on our data augmentation, RigorLLM offers a robust solution to harmful content moderation. Our experimental evaluations demonstrate that RigorLLM not only outperforms existing baselines like OpenAI API and Perspective API in detecting harmful content but also exhibits unparalleled resilience to jailbreaking attacks. The innovative use of constrained optimization and a fusion-based guardrail approach represents a significant step forward in developing more secure and reliable LLMs, setting a new standard for content moderation frameworks in the face of evolving digital threats.
Related papers
- HarmLevelBench: Evaluating Harm-Level Compliance and the Impact of Quantization on Model Alignment [1.8843687952462742]
This paper aims to address gaps in the current literature on jailbreaking techniques and the evaluation of LLM vulnerabilities.
Our contributions include the creation of a novel dataset designed to assess the harmfulness of model outputs across multiple harm levels.
We provide a comprehensive benchmark of state-of-the-art jailbreaking attacks, specifically targeting the Vicuna 13B v1.5 model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:02:49Z) - Large Language Models can be Strong Self-Detoxifiers [82.6594169242814]
Self-disciplined Autoregressive Sampling (SASA) is a lightweight controlled decoding algorithm for toxicity reduction of large language models (LLMs)
SASA tracks the margin of the current output to steer the generation away from the toxic subspace, by adjusting the autoregressive sampling strategy.
evaluated on LLMs of different scale and nature, namely Llama-3.1-Instruct (8B), Llama-2 (7B), and GPT2-L models with the RealToxicityPrompts, BOLD, and AttaQ benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T17:45:15Z) - Development of an Edge Resilient ML Ensemble to Tolerate ICS Adversarial Attacks [0.9437165725355702]
We build a resilient edge machine learning architecture that is designed to withstand adversarial attacks.
The reML is based on the Resilient DDDAS paradigm, Moving Target Defense (MTD) theory, and TinyML.
The proposed approach is power-efficient and privacy-preserving and, therefore, can be deployed on power-constrained devices to enhance ICS security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T19:37:37Z) - SEAS: Self-Evolving Adversarial Safety Optimization for Large Language Models [19.486685336959482]
Large language models (LLMs) continue to advance in capability and influence, ensuring their security and preventing harmful outputs has become crucial.
A promising approach to address these concerns involves training models to automatically generate adversarial prompts for red teaming.
We introduce the $mathbfStextelf-mathbfEtextvolving mathbfAtextdversarial mathbfStextafetyety mathbf(SEAS)$ optimization framework.
SEAS operates through three iterative stages: Initialization, Attack, and Adversa
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T16:55:06Z) - ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemma [49.91147965876678]
ShieldGemma is a suite of safety content moderation models built upon Gemma2.
Models provide robust, state-of-the-art predictions of safety risks across key harm types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-31T17:48:14Z) - Defending Large Language Models Against Attacks With Residual Stream Activation Analysis [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial threats.
This paper presents an innovative defensive strategy, given white box access to an LLM.
We apply a novel methodology for analyzing distinctive activation patterns in the residual streams for attack prompt classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T13:06:33Z) - Tiny Refinements Elicit Resilience: Toward Efficient Prefix-Model Against LLM Red-Teaming [37.32997502058661]
This paper introduces the textbfsentinel model as a plug-and-play prefix module designed to reconstruct the input prompt with just a few tokens.
The sentinel model naturally overcomes the textit parameter inefficiency and textitlimited model accessibility for fine-tuning large target models.
Our experiments across text-to-text and text-to-image demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in mitigating toxic outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T08:57:44Z) - Advancing the Robustness of Large Language Models through Self-Denoised Smoothing [50.54276872204319]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant success, but their vulnerability to adversarial perturbations has raised considerable concerns.
We propose to leverage the multitasking nature of LLMs to first denoise the noisy inputs and then to make predictions based on these denoised versions.
Unlike previous denoised smoothing techniques in computer vision, which require training a separate model to enhance the robustness of LLMs, our method offers significantly better efficiency and flexibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T15:47:00Z) - Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models [66.53468356460365]
We show that the continuous and high-dimensional nature of the visual input makes it a weak link against adversarial attacks.
We exploit visual adversarial examples to circumvent the safety guardrail of aligned LLMs with integrated vision.
Our study underscores the escalating adversarial risks associated with the pursuit of multimodality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-22T22:13:03Z) - Virtual Data Augmentation: A Robust and General Framework for
Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models [51.46732511844122]
Powerful pre-trained language models (PLM) can be fooled by small perturbations or intentional attacks.
We present Virtual Data Augmentation (VDA), a general framework for robustly fine-tuning PLMs.
Our approach is able to improve the robustness of PLMs and alleviate the performance degradation under adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-13T09:15:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.