Document Author Classification Using Parsed Language Structure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13253v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 02:32:24 GMT
• Title: Document Author Classification Using Parsed Language Structure
• Authors: Todd K Moon, Jacob H. Gunther,
• Abstract summary: We explore a new possibility for detecting authorship using grammatical structure extracted using a statistical natural language. This paper provides a proof of concept, testing author classification based on grammatical structure on a set of "proof texts" Several features extracted from the statistical natural language were explored: all subtrees of some depth from any level; rooted subtrees of some depth, part of speech, and part of speech by level in the parse tree.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Over the years there has been ongoing interest in detecting authorship of a text based on statistical properties of the text, such as by using occurrence rates of noncontextual words. In previous work, these techniques have been used, for example, to determine authorship of all of \emph{The Federalist Papers}. Such methods may be useful in more modern times to detect fake or AI authorship. Progress in statistical natural language parsers introduces the possibility of using grammatical structure to detect authorship. In this paper we explore a new possibility for detecting authorship using grammatical structural information extracted using a statistical natural language parser. This paper provides a proof of concept, testing author classification based on grammatical structure on a set of "proof texts," The Federalist Papers and Sanditon which have been as test cases in previous authorship detection studies. Several features extracted from the statistical natural language parser were explored: all subtrees of some depth from any level; rooted subtrees of some depth, part of speech, and part of speech by level in the parse tree. It was found to be helpful to project the features into a lower dimensional space. Statistical experiments on these documents demonstrate that information from a statistical parser can, in fact, assist in distinguishing authors.

Related papers

• Spotting AI's Touch: Identifying LLM-Paraphrased Spans in Text [61.22649031769564]
  We propose a novel framework, paraphrased text span detection (PTD) PTD aims to identify paraphrased text spans within a text. We construct a dedicated dataset, PASTED, for paraphrased text span detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T11:22:27Z)
• Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifs [19.073560504913356]
  The line between human-crafted and machine-generated texts has become increasingly blurred. This paper delves into the inquiry of identifying discernible and unique linguistic properties in texts that were written by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T11:20:30Z)
• Classifying text using machine learning models and determining conversation drift [4.785406121053965]
  An analysis of various types of texts is invaluable to understanding both their semantic meaning, as well as their relevance. Text classification is a method of categorising documents. It combines computer text classification and natural language processing to analyse text in aggregate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T18:09:45Z)
• Textual Entailment Recognition with Semantic Features from Empirical Text Representation [60.31047947815282]
  A text entails a hypothesis if and only if the true value of the hypothesis follows the text. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to identifying the textual entailment relationship between text and hypothesis. We employ an element-wise Manhattan distance vector-based feature that can identify the semantic entailment relationship between the text-hypothesis pair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T10:03:51Z)
• PART: Pre-trained Authorship Representation Transformer [64.78260098263489]
  Authors writing documents imprint identifying information within their texts: vocabulary, registry, punctuation, misspellings, or even emoji usage. Previous works use hand-crafted features or classification tasks to train their authorship models, leading to poor performance on out-of-domain authors. We propose a contrastively trained model fit to learn textbfauthorship embeddings instead of semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T11:08:39Z)
• Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Text [78.30080218908849]
  We propose a graph-based model for deepfake detection of text. Our approach represents the factual structure of a given document as an entity graph. Our model can distinguish the difference in the factual structure between machine-generated text and human-written text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T02:35:31Z)
• Intrinsic Probing through Dimension Selection [69.52439198455438]
  Most modern NLP systems make use of pre-trained contextual representations that attain astonishingly high performance on a variety of tasks. Such high performance should not be possible unless some form of linguistic structure inheres in these representations, and a wealth of research has sprung up on probing for it. In this paper, we draw a distinction between intrinsic probing, which examines how linguistic information is structured within a representation, and the extrinsic probing popular in prior work, which only argues for the presence of such information by showing that it can be successfully extracted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T15:21:08Z)
• A Comparative Study on Structural and Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a set of experiments using a widely-used large-scale data set for relation extraction. We show that different embedding spaces have different degrees of strength for the structural and semantic properties. These results provide useful information for developing embedding-based relation extraction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-23T15:45:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.