How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14496v1
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:44:56 GMT
- Title: How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey
- Authors: Thu Nguyen, Alessandro Canossa, Jichen Zhu,
- Abstract summary: The emerging area of em Explainable Interfaces (EIs) focuses on the user interface and user experience design aspects of XAI.
This paper presents a systematic survey of 53 publications to identify current trends in human-XAI interaction and promising directions for EI design and development.
- Score: 48.97104365617498
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Despite its technological breakthroughs, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has limited success in producing the {\em effective explanations} needed by users. In order to improve XAI systems' usability, practical interpretability, and efficacy for real users, the emerging area of {\em Explainable Interfaces} (EIs) focuses on the user interface and user experience design aspects of XAI. This paper presents a systematic survey of 53 publications to identify current trends in human-XAI interaction and promising directions for EI design and development. This is among the first systematic survey of EI research.
Related papers
- Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges.
We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow.
We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z) - Human-AI Interaction in Industrial Robotics: Design and Empirical Evaluation of a User Interface for Explainable AI-Based Robot Program Optimization [5.537321488131869]
We present an Explanation User Interface (XUI) for a state-of-the-art deep learning-based robot program.
XUI provides both naive and expert users with different user experiences depending on their skill level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T08:20:31Z) - OpenHEXAI: An Open-Source Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable Machine Learning [43.87507227859493]
This paper presents OpenHEXAI, an open-source framework for human-centered evaluation of XAI methods.
OpenHEAXI is the first large-scale infrastructural effort to facilitate human-centered benchmarks of XAI methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T22:17:59Z) - How much informative is your XAI? A decision-making assessment task to
objectively measure the goodness of explanations [53.01494092422942]
The number and complexity of personalised and user-centred approaches to XAI have rapidly grown in recent years.
It emerged that user-centred approaches to XAI positively affect the interaction between users and systems.
We propose an assessment task to objectively and quantitatively measure the goodness of XAI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T15:49:39Z) - Invisible Users: Uncovering End-Users' Requirements for Explainable AI
via Explanation Forms and Goals [19.268536451101912]
Non-technical end-users are silent and invisible users of the state-of-the-art explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) technologies.
Their demands and requirements for AI explainability are not incorporated into the design and evaluation of XAI techniques.
This makes XAI techniques ineffective or even harmful in high-stakes applications, such as healthcare, criminal justice, finance, and autonomous driving systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-10T19:35:57Z) - Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual
Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding.
An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback.
We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z) - Towards Human-centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations [18.971689499890363]
We identify and analyze 97core papers with human-based XAI evaluations over the past five years.
Our research shows that XAI is spreading more rapidly in certain application domains, such as recommender systems.
We propose practical guidelines on designing and conducting user studies for XAI researchers and practitioners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-20T20:53:00Z) - What Do End-Users Really Want? Investigation of Human-Centered XAI for
Mobile Health Apps [69.53730499849023]
We present a user-centered persona concept to evaluate explainable AI (XAI)
Results show that users' demographics and personality, as well as the type of explanation, impact explanation preferences.
Our insights bring an interactive, human-centered XAI closer to practical application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T12:51:27Z) - Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences [29.10123472973571]
explainable AI (XAI) has produced a vast collection of algorithms in recent years.
The field is starting to embrace inter-disciplinary perspectives and human-centered approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-20T21:33:46Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.