Human-AI Interaction in Industrial Robotics: Design and Empirical Evaluation of a User Interface for Explainable AI-Based Robot Program Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19349v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:20:31 GMT
- Title: Human-AI Interaction in Industrial Robotics: Design and Empirical Evaluation of a User Interface for Explainable AI-Based Robot Program Optimization
- Authors: Benjamin Alt, Johannes Zahn, Claudius Kienle, Julia Dvorak, Marvin May, Darko Katic, Rainer Jäkel, Tobias Kopp, Michael Beetz, Gisela Lanza,
- Abstract summary: We present an Explanation User Interface (XUI) for a state-of-the-art deep learning-based robot program.
XUI provides both naive and expert users with different user experiences depending on their skill level.
- Score: 5.537321488131869
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: While recent advances in deep learning have demonstrated its transformative potential, its adoption for real-world manufacturing applications remains limited. We present an Explanation User Interface (XUI) for a state-of-the-art deep learning-based robot program optimizer which provides both naive and expert users with different user experiences depending on their skill level, as well as Explainable AI (XAI) features to facilitate the application of deep learning methods in real-world applications. To evaluate the impact of the XUI on task performance, user satisfaction and cognitive load, we present the results of a preliminary user survey and propose a study design for a large-scale follow-up study.
Related papers
- How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey [48.97104365617498]
The emerging area of em Explainable Interfaces (EIs) focuses on the user interface and user experience design aspects of XAI.
This paper presents a systematic survey of 53 publications to identify current trends in human-XAI interaction and promising directions for EI design and development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T15:44:56Z) - OpenHEXAI: An Open-Source Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable Machine Learning [43.87507227859493]
This paper presents OpenHEXAI, an open-source framework for human-centered evaluation of XAI methods.
OpenHEAXI is the first large-scale infrastructural effort to facilitate human-centered benchmarks of XAI methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T22:17:59Z) - Generative User-Experience Research for Developing Domain-specific
Natural Language Processing Applications [4.5224851085910585]
This paper proposes a new methodology for integrating generative UX research into developing domain NLP applications.
Generative UX research employs domain users at the initial stages of prototype development, i.e., ideation and concept evaluation, and the last stage for evaluating system usefulness and user utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T12:17:45Z) - BO-Muse: A human expert and AI teaming framework for accelerated
experimental design [58.61002520273518]
Our algorithm lets the human expert take the lead in the experimental process.
We show that our algorithm converges sub-linearly, at a rate faster than the AI or human alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T02:56:05Z) - Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual
Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding.
An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback.
We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z) - What Do End-Users Really Want? Investigation of Human-Centered XAI for
Mobile Health Apps [69.53730499849023]
We present a user-centered persona concept to evaluate explainable AI (XAI)
Results show that users' demographics and personality, as well as the type of explanation, impact explanation preferences.
Our insights bring an interactive, human-centered XAI closer to practical application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T12:51:27Z) - Let's Go to the Alien Zoo: Introducing an Experimental Framework to
Study Usability of Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning [6.883906273999368]
Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) have gained traction as a psychologically grounded approach to generate post-hoc explanations.
We introduce the Alien Zoo, an engaging, web-based and game-inspired experimental framework.
As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the practical efficacy and feasibility of this approach in a user study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-06T17:57:05Z) - iRoPro: An interactive Robot Programming Framework [2.7651063843287718]
iRoPro allows users with little to no technical background to teach a robot new reusable actions.
We implement iRoPro as an end-to-end system on a Baxter Research Robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-08T13:53:43Z) - Human-Robot Collaboration and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of
Recent Research [69.48907856390834]
Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is the approach that explores the interaction between a human and a robot.
This paper proposes a thorough literature review of the use of machine learning techniques in the context of HRC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T15:14:33Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.