LimGen: Probing the LLMs for Generating Suggestive Limitations of Research Papers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15529v2
• Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 11:19:26 GMT
• Title: LimGen: Probing the LLMs for Generating Suggestive Limitations of Research Papers
• Authors: Abdur Rahman Bin Md Faizullah, Ashok Urlana, Rahul Mishra,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel and challenging task of Suggestive Limitation Generation (SLG) for research papers. We compile a dataset called textbftextitLimGen, encompassing 4068 research papers and their associated limitations from the ACL anthology.
• Score: 8.076841611508488
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Examining limitations is a crucial step in the scholarly research reviewing process, revealing aspects where a study might lack decisiveness or require enhancement. This aids readers in considering broader implications for further research. In this article, we present a novel and challenging task of Suggestive Limitation Generation (SLG) for research papers. We compile a dataset called \textbf{\textit{LimGen}}, encompassing 4068 research papers and their associated limitations from the ACL anthology. We investigate several approaches to harness large language models (LLMs) for producing suggestive limitations, by thoroughly examining the related challenges, practical insights, and potential opportunities. Our LimGen dataset and code can be accessed at \url{https://github.com/arbmf/LimGen}.

Related papers

• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• Breaking the Silence: the Threats of Using LLMs in Software Engineering [12.368546216271382]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained considerable traction within the Software Engineering (SE) community. This paper initiates an open discussion on potential threats to the validity of LLM-based research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T11:02:19Z)
• An Interdisciplinary Outlook on Large Language Models for Scientific Research [3.4108358650013573]
  We describe the capabilities and constraints of Large Language Models (LLMs) within disparate academic disciplines, aiming to delineate their strengths and limitations with precision. We examine how LLMs augment scientific inquiry, offering concrete examples such as accelerating literature review by summarizing vast numbers of publications. We articulate the challenges LLMs face, including their reliance on extensive and sometimes biased datasets, and the potential ethical dilemmas stemming from their use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T19:41:09Z)
• Evaluating, Understanding, and Improving Constrained Text Generation for Large Language Models [49.74036826946397]
  This study investigates constrained text generation for large language models (LLMs) Our research mainly focuses on mainstream open-source LLMs, categorizing constraints into lexical, structural, and relation-based types. Results illuminate LLMs' capacity and deficiency to incorporate constraints and provide insights for future developments in constrained text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T03:58:49Z)
• A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content [97.87912800179531]
  The ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance. We aim to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks. We also posit the necessity for a multi-faceted approach to defend against various attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T09:10:26Z)
• RRAML: Reinforced Retrieval Augmented Machine Learning [10.94680155282906]
  We propose a novel framework called Reinforced Retrieval Augmented Machine Learning (RRAML) RRAML integrates the reasoning capabilities of large language models with supporting information retrieved by a purpose-built retriever from a vast user-provided database. We believe that the research agenda outlined in this paper has the potential to profoundly impact the field of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T13:51:19Z)
• The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Texts [47.49470179549773]
  The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has resulted in the production of texts that are almost indistinguishable from texts written by humans. This has sparked concerns about the potential misuse of such texts, such as spreading misinformation and causing disruptions in the education system. This survey aims to provide an overview of existing LLM-generated text detection techniques and enhance the control and regulation of language generation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T04:49:17Z)
• REAL ML: Recognizing, Exploring, and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research [19.71032778307425]
  Transparency around limitations can improve the scientific rigor of research, help ensure appropriate interpretation of research findings, and make research claims more credible. Despite these benefits, the machine learning (ML) research community lacks well-developed norms around disclosing and discussing limitations. We conduct an iterative design process with 30 ML and ML-adjacent researchers to develop REAL ML, a set of guided activities to help ML researchers recognize, explore, and articulate the limitations of their research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T15:32:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.