Large Language Models Offer an Alternative to the Traditional Approach of Topic Modelling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16248v2
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:46:26 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models Offer an Alternative to the Traditional Approach of Topic Modelling
- Authors: Yida Mu, Chun Dong, Kalina Bontcheva, Xingyi Song,
- Abstract summary: We investigate the untapped potential of large language models (LLMs) as an alternative for uncovering the underlying topics within extensive text corpora.
Our findings indicate that LLMs with appropriate prompts can stand out as a viable alternative, capable of generating relevant topic titles and adhering to human guidelines to refine and merge topics.
- Score: 0.9095496510579351
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Topic modelling, as a well-established unsupervised technique, has found extensive use in automatically detecting significant topics within a corpus of documents. However, classic topic modelling approaches (e.g., LDA) have certain drawbacks, such as the lack of semantic understanding and the presence of overlapping topics. In this work, we investigate the untapped potential of large language models (LLMs) as an alternative for uncovering the underlying topics within extensive text corpora. To this end, we introduce a framework that prompts LLMs to generate topics from a given set of documents and establish evaluation protocols to assess the clustering efficacy of LLMs. Our findings indicate that LLMs with appropriate prompts can stand out as a viable alternative, capable of generating relevant topic titles and adhering to human guidelines to refine and merge topics. Through in-depth experiments and evaluation, we summarise the advantages and constraints of employing LLMs in topic extraction.
Related papers
- Interactive Topic Models with Optimal Transport [75.26555710661908]
We present EdTM, as an approach for label name supervised topic modeling.
EdTM models topic modeling as an assignment problem while leveraging LM/LLM based document-topic affinities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T13:57:27Z) - Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models for Topic Modeling [18.317976368281716]
We quantitatively evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for topic modeling.
We show that LLMs can identify coherent and diverse topics with few hallucinations but may take shortcuts by focusing only on parts of documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-02T10:25:02Z) - Addressing Topic Granularity and Hallucination in Large Language Models for Topic Modelling [1.0345450222523374]
Large language models (LLMs) with their strong zero-shot topic extraction capabilities offer an alternative to probabilistic topic modelling.
This paper focuses on addressing the issues of topic granularity and hallucinations for better LLM-based topic modelling.
Our approach does not rely on traditional human annotation to rank preferred answers but employs a reconstruction pipeline to modify raw topics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T16:32:07Z) - Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges [57.88520765782177]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance.
We propose a coherent taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics, offering a structured framework to understand and compare these methods.
By discussing unresolved challenges, including bias, robustness, domain-specificity, and unified evaluation, this paper seeks to offer insights to researchers and advocate for fairer and more advanced NLG evaluation techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T15:59:09Z) - Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation [54.85665903448207]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language.
This work aims to embark on an assessment of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, Flan models, and LLaMA2 models, in both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T15:12:15Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation [77.91673633328148]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
This survey presents a taxonomy that categorizes these models into two major paradigms, respectively Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T13:51:26Z) - Knowledge-Aware Bayesian Deep Topic Model [50.58975785318575]
We propose a Bayesian generative model for incorporating prior domain knowledge into hierarchical topic modeling.
Our proposed model efficiently integrates the prior knowledge and improves both hierarchical topic discovery and document representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-20T09:16:05Z) - Topic Discovery via Latent Space Clustering of Pretrained Language Model
Representations [35.74225306947918]
We propose a joint latent space learning and clustering framework built upon PLM embeddings.
Our model effectively leverages the strong representation power and superb linguistic features brought by PLMs for topic discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-09T17:26:08Z) - Keyword Assisted Embedded Topic Model [1.9000421840914223]
Probabilistic topic models describe how words in documents are generated via a set of latent distributions called topics.
Recently, the Embedded Topic Model (ETM) has extended LDA to utilize the semantic information in word embeddings to derive semantically richer topics.
We propose the Keyword Assisted Embedded Topic Model (KeyETM), which equips ETM with the ability to incorporate user knowledge in the form of informative topic-level priors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-22T07:27:17Z) - Author Clustering and Topic Estimation for Short Texts [69.54017251622211]
We propose a novel model that expands on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation by modeling strong dependence among the words in the same document.
We also simultaneously cluster users, removing the need for post-hoc cluster estimation.
Our method performs as well as -- or better -- than traditional approaches to problems arising in short text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-15T20:55:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.