Outcome-Constrained Large Language Models for Countering Hate Speech

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17146v2
• Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:09:49 GMT
• Title: Outcome-Constrained Large Language Models for Countering Hate Speech
• Authors: Lingzi Hong, Pengcheng Luo, Eduardo Blanco, Xiaoying Song,
• Abstract summary: This study aims to develop methods for generating counterspeech constrained by conversation outcomes. We experiment with large language models (LLMs) to incorporate into the text generation process two desired conversation outcomes. Evaluation results show that our methods effectively steer the generation of counterspeech toward the desired outcomes.
• Score: 10.434435022492723
• License:
• Abstract: Automatic counterspeech generation methods have been developed to assist efforts in combating hate speech. Existing research focuses on generating counterspeech with linguistic attributes such as being polite, informative, and intent-driven. However, the real impact of counterspeech in online environments is seldom considered. This study aims to develop methods for generating counterspeech constrained by conversation outcomes and evaluate their effectiveness. We experiment with large language models (LLMs) to incorporate into the text generation process two desired conversation outcomes: low conversation incivility and non-hateful hater reentry. Specifically, we experiment with instruction prompts, LLM finetuning, and LLM reinforcement learning (RL). Evaluation results show that our methods effectively steer the generation of counterspeech toward the desired outcomes. Our analyses, however, show that there are differences in the quality and style depending on the model.

Related papers

• Assessing the Human Likeness of AI-Generated Counterspeech [10.434435022492723]
  Counterspeech is a targeted response to counteract and challenge abusive or hateful content. Previous studies have proposed different strategies for automatically generated counterspeech. We investigate the human likeness of AI-generated counterspeech, a critical factor influencing effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T18:48:47Z)
• Recent Advances in Speech Language Models: A Survey [45.968078636811356]
  Speech Language Models (SpeechLMs) are end-to-end models that generate speech without converting from text. This paper provides the first comprehensive overview of recent methodologies for constructing SpeechLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T21:48:12Z)
• SpeechPrompt: Prompting Speech Language Models for Speech Processing Tasks [94.10497337235083]
  We are first to explore the potential of prompting speech LMs in the domain of speech processing. We reformulate speech processing tasks into speech-to-unit generation tasks. We show that the prompting method can achieve competitive performance compared to the strong fine-tuning method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T13:00:10Z)
• Intent-conditioned and Non-toxic Counterspeech Generation using Multi-Task Instruction Tuning with RLAIF [14.2594830589926]
  Counterspeech, defined as a response to online hate speech, is increasingly used as a non-censorial solution. Our study introduces CoARL, a novel framework enhancing counterspeech generation by modeling the pragmatic implications underlying social biases in hateful statements. CoARL's first two phases involve sequential multi-instruction tuning, teaching the model to understand intents, reactions, and harms of offensive statements, and then learning task-specific low-rank adapter weights for generating intent-conditioned counterspeech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T08:03:49Z)
• Toward Joint Language Modeling for Speech Units and Text [89.32163954508489]
  We explore joint language modeling for speech units and text. We introduce automatic metrics to evaluate how well the joint LM mixes speech and text. Our results show that by mixing speech units and text with our proposed mixing techniques, the joint LM improves over a speech-only baseline on SLU tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T20:53:39Z)
• Understanding Counterspeech for Online Harm Mitigation [12.104301755723542]
  Counterspeech offers direct rebuttals to hateful speech by challenging perpetrators of hate and showing support to targets of abuse. It provides a promising alternative to more contentious measures, such as content moderation and deplatforming. This paper systematically reviews counterspeech research in the social sciences and compares methodologies and findings with computer science efforts in automatic counterspeech generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T20:54:01Z)
• SpeechGen: Unlocking the Generative Power of Speech Language Models with Prompts [108.04306136086807]
  We present research that explores the application of prompt tuning to stimulate speech LMs for various generation tasks, within a unified framework called SpeechGen. The proposed unified framework holds great promise for efficiency and effectiveness, particularly with the imminent arrival of advanced speech LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T22:35:27Z)
• Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Review [105.1545308184483]
  Self-supervised representation learning methods promise a single universal model that would benefit a wide variety of tasks and domains. Speech representation learning is experiencing similar progress in three main categories: generative, contrastive, and predictive methods. This review presents approaches for self-supervised speech representation learning and their connection to other research areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T16:52:57Z)
• Towards Language Modelling in the Speech Domain Using Sub-word Linguistic Units [56.52704348773307]
  We propose a novel LSTM-based generative speech LM based on linguistic units including syllables and phonemes. With a limited dataset, orders of magnitude smaller than that required by contemporary generative models, our model closely approximates babbling speech. We show the effect of training with auxiliary text LMs, multitask learning objectives, and auxiliary articulatory features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T22:48:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.