DisCGen: A Framework for Discourse-Informed Counterspeech Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18147v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 23:20:17 GMT
• Title: DisCGen: A Framework for Discourse-Informed Counterspeech Generation
• Authors: Sabit Hassan, Malihe Alikhani
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework based on theories of discourse to study the inferential links that connect counter speeches to hateful comments. We present a process for collecting an in-the-wild dataset of counterspeech from Reddit. We show that by using our dataset and framework, large language models can generate contextually-grounded counterspeech informed by theories of discourse.
• Score: 34.75404551612012
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Counterspeech can be an effective method for battling hateful content on social media. Automated counterspeech generation can aid in this process. Generated counterspeech, however, can be viable only when grounded in the context of topic, audience and sensitivity as these factors influence both the efficacy and appropriateness. In this work, we propose a novel framework based on theories of discourse to study the inferential links that connect counter speeches to the hateful comment. Within this framework, we propose: i) a taxonomy of counterspeech derived from discourse frameworks, and ii) discourse-informed prompting strategies for generating contextually-grounded counterspeech. To construct and validate this framework, we present a process for collecting an in-the-wild dataset of counterspeech from Reddit. Using this process, we manually annotate a dataset of 3.9k Reddit comment pairs for the presence of hatespeech and counterspeech. The positive pairs are annotated for 10 classes in our proposed taxonomy. We annotate these pairs with paraphrased counterparts to remove offensiveness and first-person references. We show that by using our dataset and framework, large language models can generate contextually-grounded counterspeech informed by theories of discourse. According to our human evaluation, our approaches can act as a safeguard against critical failures of discourse-agnostic models.

Related papers

• Generative AI may backfire for counterspeech [20.57872238271025]
  We analyze whether contextualized counterspeech generated by state-of-the-art AI is effective in curbing online hate speech. We find that non-contextualized counterspeech employing a warning-of-consequence strategy significantly reduces online hate speech. However, contextualized counterspeech generated by LLMs proves ineffective and may even backfire.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T14:47:00Z)
• CrowdCounter: A benchmark type-specific multi-target counterspeech dataset [10.133642589954192]
  We introduce a new dataset - CrowdCounter containing 3,425 hate speech-counterspeech pairs. The design of our annotation platform itself encourages annotators to write type-specific, non-redundant and high-quality counterspeech. We evaluate two frameworks for generating counterspeech responses - vanilla and type-controlled prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T10:24:51Z)
• Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue [78.88479749811376]
  Current systems for spoken dialogue rely on pipelines independent voice activity detection and text-to-speech. We show how Moshi Moshi can provide streaming speech recognition and text-to-speech. Our resulting model is first real-time full spoken large language model modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:55:39Z)
• Outcome-Constrained Large Language Models for Countering Hate Speech [10.434435022492723]
  This study aims to develop methods for generating counterspeech constrained by conversation outcomes. We experiment with large language models (LLMs) to incorporate into the text generation process two desired conversation outcomes. Evaluation results show that our methods effectively steer the generation of counterspeech toward the desired outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:44:06Z)
• Towards Interpretable Hate Speech Detection using Large Language Model-extracted Rationales [15.458557611029518]
  Social media platforms are a prominent arena for users to engage in interpersonal discussions and express opinions. There arises a need to automatically identify and flag instances of hate speech. We propose to use state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract features in the form of rationales from the input text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T03:22:35Z)
• ContextSpeech: Expressive and Efficient Text-to-Speech for Paragraph Reading [65.88161811719353]
  This work develops a lightweight yet effective Text-to-Speech system, ContextSpeech. We first design a memory-cached recurrence mechanism to incorporate global text and speech context into sentence encoding. We construct hierarchically-structured textual semantics to broaden the scope for global context enhancement. Experiments show that ContextSpeech significantly improves the voice quality and prosody in paragraph reading with competitive model efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T06:55:03Z)
• Understanding Counterspeech for Online Harm Mitigation [12.104301755723542]
  Counterspeech offers direct rebuttals to hateful speech by challenging perpetrators of hate and showing support to targets of abuse. It provides a promising alternative to more contentious measures, such as content moderation and deplatforming. This paper systematically reviews counterspeech research in the social sciences and compares methodologies and findings with computer science efforts in automatic counterspeech generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T20:54:01Z)
• CoSyn: Detecting Implicit Hate Speech in Online Conversations Using a Context Synergized Hyperbolic Network [52.85130555886915]
  CoSyn is a context-synergized neural network that explicitly incorporates user- and conversational context for detecting implicit hate speech in online conversations. We show that CoSyn outperforms all our baselines in detecting implicit hate speech with absolute improvements in the range of 1.24% - 57.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:30:43Z)
• SpeechLM: Enhanced Speech Pre-Training with Unpaired Textual Data [100.46303484627045]
  We propose a cross-modal Speech and Language Model (SpeechLM) to align speech and text pre-training with a pre-defined unified representation. Specifically, we introduce two alternative discrete tokenizers to bridge the speech and text modalities. We evaluate SpeechLM on various spoken language processing tasks including speech recognition, speech translation, and universal representation evaluation framework SUPERB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T09:12:10Z)
• Unsupervised Text-to-Speech Synthesis by Unsupervised Automatic Speech Recognition [60.84668086976436]
  An unsupervised text-to-speech synthesis (TTS) system learns to generate the speech waveform corresponding to any written sentence in a language. This paper proposes an unsupervised TTS system by leveraging recent advances in unsupervised automatic speech recognition (ASR) Our unsupervised system can achieve comparable performance to the supervised system in seven languages with about 10-20 hours of speech each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T17:57:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.