ImageNet-D: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness on Diffusion Synthetic Object

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18775v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:23:39 GMT
• Title: ImageNet-D: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness on Diffusion Synthetic Object
• Authors: Chenshuang Zhang, Fei Pan, Junmo Kim, In So Kweon, Chengzhi Mao,
• Abstract summary: We introduce generative model as a data source for hard images that benchmark deep models' robustness. We are able to generate images with more diversified backgrounds, textures, and materials than any prior work, where we term this benchmark as ImageNet-D. Our work suggests that diffusion models can be an effective source to test vision models.
• Score: 78.58860252442045
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We establish rigorous benchmarks for visual perception robustness. Synthetic images such as ImageNet-C, ImageNet-9, and Stylized ImageNet provide specific type of evaluation over synthetic corruptions, backgrounds, and textures, yet those robustness benchmarks are restricted in specified variations and have low synthetic quality. In this work, we introduce generative model as a data source for synthesizing hard images that benchmark deep models' robustness. Leveraging diffusion models, we are able to generate images with more diversified backgrounds, textures, and materials than any prior work, where we term this benchmark as ImageNet-D. Experimental results show that ImageNet-D results in a significant accuracy drop to a range of vision models, from the standard ResNet visual classifier to the latest foundation models like CLIP and MiniGPT-4, significantly reducing their accuracy by up to 60\%. Our work suggests that diffusion models can be an effective source to test vision models. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/chenshuang-zhang/imagenet_d.

Related papers

• Self-supervised Benchmark Lottery on ImageNet: Do Marginal Improvements Translate to Improvements on Similar Datasets? [1.3821203559674384]
  We investigate whether models that seem to perform well on ImageNet may experience significant performance declines on similar datasets. Specifically, state-of-the-art frameworks such as DINO and Swav, which are praised for their performance, exhibit substantial drops in performance. We argue that otherwise good and desirable properties of models remain hidden when benchmarking is only performed on the ImageNet validation set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T07:19:12Z)
• ImagiNet: A Multi-Content Benchmark for Synthetic Image Detection [0.0]
  We introduce ImagiNet, a dataset of 200K examples spanning four categories: photos, paintings, faces, and miscellaneous. Synthetic images in ImagiNet are produced with both open-source and proprietary generators, whereas real counterparts for each content type are collected from public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T13:57:24Z)
• ImageNet-E: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness via Attribute Editing [45.14977000707886]
  Higher accuracy on ImageNet usually leads to better robustness against different corruptions. We create a toolkit for object editing with controls of backgrounds, sizes, positions, and directions. We evaluate the performance of current deep learning models, including both convolutional neural networks and vision transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T02:02:32Z)
• Lafite2: Few-shot Text-to-Image Generation [132.14211027057766]
  We propose a novel method for pre-training text-to-image generation model on image-only datasets. It considers a retrieval-then-optimization procedure to synthesize pseudo text features. It can be beneficial to a wide range of settings, including the few-shot, semi-supervised and fully-supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T16:22:23Z)
• Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition? [69.42645602062024]
  We study whether and how synthetic images generated from state-of-the-art text-to-image generation models can be used for image recognition tasks. We showcase the powerfulness and shortcomings of synthetic data from existing generative models, and propose strategies for better applying synthetic data for recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:54:24Z)
• Towards Robustness of Neural Networks [0.0]
  We introduce ImageNet-A/O and ImageNet-R as well as a synthetic environment and testing suite we called CAOS. All of the datasets were created for testing robustness and measuring progress in robustness. We build off of simple baselines in the form of Maximum Logit, and Typicality Score as well as create a novel data augmentation method in the form of DeepAugment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T19:41:10Z)
• Contemplating real-world object classification [53.10151901863263]
  We reanalyze the ObjectNet dataset recently proposed by Barbu et al. containing objects in daily life situations. We find that applying deep models to the isolated objects, rather than the entire scene as is done in the original paper, results in around 20-30% performance improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T23:29:59Z)
• Shape-Texture Debiased Neural Network Training [50.6178024087048]
  Convolutional Neural Networks are often biased towards either texture or shape, depending on the training dataset. We develop an algorithm for shape-texture debiased learning. Experiments show that our method successfully improves model performance on several image recognition benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T19:16:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.