How Robust are the Tabular QA Models for Scientific Tables? A Study using Customized Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00401v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:48:49 GMT
• Title: How Robust are the Tabular QA Models for Scientific Tables? A Study using Customized Dataset
• Authors: Akash Ghosh, B Venkata Sahith, Niloy Ganguly, Pawan Goyal, Mayank Singh,
• Abstract summary: "SciTabQA" is an innovative dataset to study question-answering over scientific heterogeneous data. We benchmark three state-of-the-art Tabular QA models, and find that the best F1 score is only 0.462.
• Score: 23.822733961152103
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Question-answering (QA) on hybrid scientific tabular and textual data deals with scientific information, and relies on complex numerical reasoning. In recent years, while tabular QA has seen rapid progress, understanding their robustness on scientific information is lacking due to absence of any benchmark dataset. To investigate the robustness of the existing state-of-the-art QA models on scientific hybrid tabular data, we propose a new dataset, "SciTabQA", consisting of 822 question-answer pairs from scientific tables and their descriptions. With the help of this dataset, we assess the state-of-the-art Tabular QA models based on their ability (i) to use heterogeneous information requiring both structured data (table) and unstructured data (text) and (ii) to perform complex scientific reasoning tasks. In essence, we check the capability of the models to interpret scientific tables and text. Our experiments show that "SciTabQA" is an innovative dataset to study question-answering over scientific heterogeneous data. We benchmark three state-of-the-art Tabular QA models, and find that the best F1 score is only 0.462.

Related papers

• KET-QA: A Dataset for Knowledge Enhanced Table Question Answering [63.56707527868466]
  We propose to use a knowledge base (KB) as the external knowledge source for TableQA. Every question requires the integration of information from both the table and the sub-graph to be answered. We design a retriever-reasoner structured pipeline model to extract pertinent information from the vast knowledge sub-graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T18:26:32Z)
• Why Tabular Foundation Models Should Be a Research Priority [65.75744962286538]
  Tabular data is the dominant modality in many fields, yet it is given hardly any research attention and significantly lags behind in terms of scale and power. We believe the time is now to start developing tabular foundation models, or what we coin a Large Tabular Model (LTM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T10:05:16Z)
• Towards Controlled Table-to-Text Generation with Scientific Reasoning [46.87189607486007]
  We present a new task for generating fluent and logical descriptions that match user preferences over scientific data, aiming to automate scientific document analysis. We construct a new challenging dataset,SciTab, consisting of table-description pairs extracted from the scientific literature, with highlighted cells and corresponding domain-specific knowledge base. The results showed that large models struggle to produce accurate content that aligns with user preferences. As the first of its kind, our work should motivate further research in scientific domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T22:57:35Z)
• QTSumm: Query-Focused Summarization over Tabular Data [58.62152746690958]
  People primarily consult tables to conduct data analysis or answer specific questions. We define a new query-focused table summarization task, where text generation models have to perform human-like reasoning. We introduce a new benchmark named QTSumm for this task, which contains 7,111 human-annotated query-summary pairs over 2,934 tables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:43:51Z)
• Towards Complex Document Understanding By Discrete Reasoning [77.91722463958743]
  Document Visual Question Answering (VQA) aims to understand visually-rich documents to answer questions in natural language. We introduce a new Document VQA dataset, named TAT-DQA, which consists of 3,067 document pages and 16,558 question-answer pairs. We develop a novel model named MHST that takes into account the information in multi-modalities, including text, layout and visual image, to intelligently address different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T01:43:19Z)
• Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? [0.0]
  We show that tree-based models remain state-of-the-art on medium-sized data. We conduct an empirical investigation into the differing inductive biases of tree-based models and Neural Networks (NNs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T08:36:08Z)
• OmniTab: Pretraining with Natural and Synthetic Data for Few-shot Table-based Question Answering [106.73213656603453]
  We develop a simple table-based QA model with minimal annotation effort. We propose an omnivorous pretraining approach that consumes both natural and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-08T01:23:45Z)
• TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance [71.76018597965378]
  We build a new large-scale Question Answering dataset containing both Tabular And Textual data, named TAT-QA. We propose a novel QA model termed TAGOP, which is capable of reasoning over both tables and text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T06:12:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.