Detecting Gender Bias in Course Evaluations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01857v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:35:05 GMT
• Title: Detecting Gender Bias in Course Evaluations
• Authors: Sarah Lindau, Linnea Nilsson,
• Abstract summary: We use different methods to examine and explore the data and find differences in what students write about courses depending on gender of the examiner. Data from English and Swedish courses are evaluated and compared, in order to capture more nuance in the gender bias that might be found.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: An outtake from the findnings of a master thesis studying gender bias in course evaluations through the lense of machine learning and nlp. We use different methods to examine and explore the data and find differences in what students write about courses depending on gender of the examiner. Data from English and Swedish courses are evaluated and compared, in order to capture more nuance in the gender bias that might be found. Here we present the results from the work so far, but this is an ongoing project and there is more work to do.

Related papers

• Revealing and Reducing Gender Biases in Vision and Language Assistants (VLAs) [82.57490175399693]
  We study gender bias in 22 popular image-to-text vision-language assistants (VLAs) Our results show that VLAs replicate human biases likely present in the data, such as real-world occupational imbalances. To eliminate the gender bias in these models, we find that finetuning-based debiasing methods achieve the best tradeoff between debiasing and retaining performance on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T05:59:44Z)
• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• GenderBias-\emph{VL}: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing [72.0343083866144]
  This paper introduces the GenderBias-emphVL benchmark to evaluate occupation-related gender bias in Large Vision-Language Models. Using our benchmark, we extensively evaluate 15 commonly used open-source LVLMs and state-of-the-art commercial APIs. Our findings reveal widespread gender biases in existing LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T05:55:15Z)
• DiFair: A Benchmark for Disentangled Assessment of Gender Knowledge and Bias [13.928591341824248]
  Debiasing techniques have been proposed to mitigate the gender bias that is prevalent in pretrained language models. These are often evaluated on datasets that check the extent to which the model is gender-neutral in its predictions. This evaluation protocol overlooks the possible adverse impact of bias mitigation on useful gender knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T15:27:16Z)
• VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution [80.57383975987676]
  VisoGender is a novel dataset for benchmarking gender bias in vision-language models. We focus on occupation-related biases within a hegemonic system of binary gender, inspired by Winograd and Winogender schemas. We benchmark several state-of-the-art vision-language models and find that they demonstrate bias in resolving binary gender in complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:59:51Z)
• Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning [87.15170977240643]
  We conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks. We demonstrate the negative consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations. We present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias without hurting the correlations with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T04:27:40Z)
• Assessing Group-level Gender Bias in Professional Evaluations: The Case of Medical Student End-of-Shift Feedback [14.065979111248497]
  Female physicians tend to be underrepresented in senior positions, make less money than their male counterparts and receive fewer promotions. This work was mainly conducted by looking for specific words using fixed dictionaries such as LIWC and focused on recommendation letters. We use a dataset of written and quantitative assessments of medical student performance on individual shifts of work, collected across multiple institutions, to investigate the extent to which gender bias exists in a day-to-day context for medical students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T05:01:36Z)
• A Survey on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing [22.91475787277623]
  We present a survey of 304 papers on gender bias in natural language processing. We compare and contrast approaches to detecting and mitigating gender bias. We find that research on gender bias suffers from four core limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T14:54:18Z)
• Evaluating Gender Bias in Natural Language Inference [5.034017602990175]
  We propose an evaluation methodology to measure gender bias in natural language understanding through inference. We use our challenge task to investigate state-of-the-art NLI models on the presence of gender stereotypes using occupations. Our findings suggest that three models trained on MNLI and SNLI datasets are significantly prone to gender-induced prediction errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T09:41:51Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.