Related papers: Blessing or curse? A survey on the Impact of Generative AI on Fake News

Blessing or curse? A survey on the Impact of Generative AI on Fake News

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03021v1
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:14:45 GMT
Title: Blessing or curse? A survey on the Impact of Generative AI on Fake News
Authors: Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl,
Abstract summary: It is now possible to automate the creation of masses of high-quality individually targeted Fake News. This survey provides a comprehensive examination of the research and practical use of Generative AI for Fake News detection and creation in 2024.
Score: 44.99833362998488
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: Fake news significantly influence our society. They impact consumers, voters, and many other societal groups. While Fake News exist for a centuries, Generative AI brings fake news on a new level. It is now possible to automate the creation of masses of high-quality individually targeted Fake News. On the other end, Generative AI can also help detecting Fake News. Both fields are young but developing fast. This survey provides a comprehensive examination of the research and practical use of Generative AI for Fake News detection and creation in 2024. Following the Structured Literature Survey approach, the paper synthesizes current results in the following topic clusters 1) enabling technologies, 2) creation of Fake News, 3) case study social media as most relevant distribution channel, 4) detection of Fake News, and 5) deepfakes as upcoming technology. The article also identifies current challenges and open issues.

Related papers

Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models [48.5847914481222]
We study the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news. Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T08:39:45Z)
Fake News Detection and Behavioral Analysis: Case of COVID-19 [0.22940141855172028]
"Infodemic" due to spread of fake news regarding the pandemic has been a global issue. Readers could mistake fake news for real news, and consequently have less access to authentic information. It is challenging to accurately identify fake news data in social media posts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T13:42:08Z)
Nothing Stands Alone: Relational Fake News Detection with Hypergraph Neural Networks [49.29141811578359]
We propose to leverage a hypergraph to represent group-wise interaction among news, while focusing on important news relations with its dual-level attention mechanism. Our approach yields remarkable performance and maintains the high performance even with a small subset of labeled news data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-24T00:19:32Z)
FALSE: Fake News Automatic and Lightweight Solution [0.20999222360659603]
In this paper, R code have been used to study and visualize a modern fake news dataset. We use clustering, classification, correlation and various plots to analyze and present the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-16T11:53:30Z)
Towards Smart Fake News Detection Through Explainable AI [1.160208922584163]
People now see social media sites as their sole source of information due to their popularity. We discuss the pitfalls in the current explainable AI-based fake news detection models and present our ongoing research on multi-modal explainable fake news detection model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T10:48:45Z)
Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded Training Data Generation [105.20743048379387]
We propose a novel framework for generating training examples informed by the known styles and strategies of human-authored propaganda. Specifically, we perform self-critical sequence training guided by natural language inference to ensure the validity of the generated articles. Our experimental results show that fake news detectors trained on PropaNews are better at detecting human-written disinformation by 3.62 - 7.69% F1 score on two public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T14:24:19Z)
Combining Machine Learning with Knowledge Engineering to detect Fake News in Social Networks-a survey [0.7120858995754653]
In the news media and social media the information is spread highspeed but without accuracy and hence detection mechanism should be able to predict news fast enough to tackle the dissemination of fake news. In this paper we present what is fake news, importance of fake news, overall impact of fake news on different areas, different ways to detect fake news on social media, existing detections algorithms that can help us to overcome the issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T07:43:15Z)
User Preference-aware Fake News Detection [61.86175081368782]
Existing fake news detection algorithms focus on mining news content for deceptive signals. We propose a new framework, UPFD, which simultaneously captures various signals from user preferences by joint content and graph modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-25T21:19:24Z)
How does Truth Evolve into Fake News? An Empirical Study of Fake News Evolution [55.27685924751459]
We present the Fake News Evolution dataset: a new dataset tracking the fake news evolution process. Our dataset is composed of 950 paired data, each of which consists of articles representing the truth, the fake news, and the evolved fake news. We observe the features during the evolution and they are the disinformation techniques, text similarity, top 10 keywords, classification accuracy, parts of speech, and sentiment properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-10T09:01:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.