A Framework for Guided Motion Planning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03133v1
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:58:19 GMT
- Title: A Framework for Guided Motion Planning
- Authors: Amnon Attali, Stav Ashur, Isaac Burton Love, Courtney McBeth, James Motes, Marco Morales, Nancy M. Amato,
- Abstract summary: We formalize the notion of guided search by defining the concept of a guiding space.
This new language encapsulates many seemingly distinct prior methods under the same framework.
We suggest an information theoretic method to evaluate guidance, which experimentally matches intuition when tested on known algorithms.
- Score: 1.179253400575852
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Randomized sampling based algorithms are widely used in robot motion planning due to the problem's intractability, and are experimentally effective on a wide range of problem instances. Most variants bias their sampling using various heuristics related to the known underlying structure of the search space. In this work, we formalize the intuitive notion of guided search by defining the concept of a guiding space. This new language encapsulates many seemingly distinct prior methods under the same framework, and allows us to reason about guidance, a previously obscured core contribution of different algorithms. We suggest an information theoretic method to evaluate guidance, which experimentally matches intuition when tested on known algorithms in a variety of environments. The language and evaluation of guidance suggests improvements to existing methods, and allows for simple hybrid algorithms that combine guidance from multiple sources.
Related papers
- Domain Knowledge Injection in Bayesian Search for New Materials [0.0]
We propose DKIBO, a Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm that accommodates domain knowledge to tune exploration in the search space.
We empirically demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed method by successfully injecting domain knowledge in a materials design task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-26T01:55:55Z) - Relation-aware Ensemble Learning for Knowledge Graph Embedding [68.94900786314666]
We propose to learn an ensemble by leveraging existing methods in a relation-aware manner.
exploring these semantics using relation-aware ensemble leads to a much larger search space than general ensemble methods.
We propose a divide-search-combine algorithm RelEns-DSC that searches the relation-wise ensemble weights independently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T07:40:12Z) - Best-Effort Adaptation [62.00856290846247]
We present a new theoretical analysis of sample reweighting methods, including bounds holding uniformly over the weights.
We show how these bounds can guide the design of learning algorithms that we discuss in detail.
We report the results of a series of experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of our best-effort adaptation and domain adaptation algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T00:09:07Z) - Discovering Multiple Algorithm Configurations [24.7500811470085]
We extend algorithm configuration to automatically discover multiple modes in the tuning dataset.
Unlike prior work, these configuration modes represent multiple dataset instances and are detected automatically during the course of optimization.
Our results characterize these methods on synthetic test functions and in multiple robotics application domains: stereoscopic depth estimation, differentiable rendering, motion planning, and visual odometry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-13T19:21:59Z) - Evaluating Guiding Spaces for Motion Planning [2.384084215091134]
We define the emphmotion planning guiding space, which encapsulates many seemingly distinct prior works under the same framework.
We also suggest an information theoretic method to evaluate guided planning which places the focus on the quality of the resulting biased sampling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-16T21:17:51Z) - Language Model Decoding as Likelihood-Utility Alignment [54.70547032876017]
We introduce a taxonomy that groups decoding strategies based on their implicit assumptions about how well the model's likelihood is aligned with the task-specific notion of utility.
Specifically, by analyzing the correlation between the likelihood and the utility of predictions across a diverse set of tasks, we provide the first empirical evidence supporting the proposed taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T17:55:51Z) - Model-Based Deep Learning: On the Intersection of Deep Learning and
Optimization [101.32332941117271]
Decision making algorithms are used in a multitude of different applications.
Deep learning approaches that use highly parametric architectures tuned from data without relying on mathematical models are becoming increasingly popular.
Model-based optimization and data-centric deep learning are often considered to be distinct disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T13:40:08Z) - Algorithm Selection on a Meta Level [58.720142291102135]
We introduce the problem of meta algorithm selection, which essentially asks for the best way to combine a given set of algorithm selectors.
We present a general methodological framework for meta algorithm selection as well as several concrete learning methods as instantiations of this framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-20T11:23:21Z) - Determinantal Beam Search [75.84501052642361]
Beam search is a go-to strategy for decoding neural sequence models.
In use-cases that call for multiple solutions, a diverse or representative set is often desired.
By posing iterations in beam search as a series of subdeterminant problems, we can turn the algorithm into a diverse subset selection process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T13:01:46Z) - A Survey On (Stochastic Fractal Search) Algorithm [0.0]
This paper presents a metaheuristic algorithm called Fractal Search, inspired by the natural phenomenon of growth based on a mathematical concept called the fractal.
This paper also focuses on the steps and some example applications of engineering design optimisation problems commonly used in the literature being applied to the proposed algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-25T22:44:04Z) - Learning to Actively Learn: A Robust Approach [22.75298609290053]
This work proposes a procedure for designing algorithms for adaptive data collection tasks like active learning and pure-exploration multi-armed bandits.
Our adaptive algorithm is learned via adversarial training over equivalence classes of problems derived from information theoretic lower bounds.
We perform synthetic experiments to justify the stability and effectiveness of the training procedure, and then evaluate the method on tasks derived from real data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-29T06:48:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.