AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03407v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:12:24 GMT
• Title: AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment
• Authors: Chunyi Li, Tengchuan Kou, Yixuan Gao, Yuqin Cao, Wei Sun, Zicheng Zhang, Yingjie Zhou, Zhichao Zhang, Weixia Zhang, Haoning Wu, Xiaohong Liu, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai,
• Abstract summary: We create the largest AIGI subjective quality database to date with 20,000 AIGIs and 420,000 subjective ratings, known as AIGIQA-20K. We conduct benchmark experiments on this database to assess the correspondence between 16 mainstream AIGI quality models and human perception.
• Score: 54.93996119324928
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid advancements in AI-Generated Content (AIGC), AI-Generated Images (AIGIs) have been widely applied in entertainment, education, and social media. However, due to the significant variance in quality among different AIGIs, there is an urgent need for models that consistently match human subjective ratings. To address this issue, we organized a challenge towards AIGC quality assessment on NTIRE 2024 that extensively considers 15 popular generative models, utilizing dynamic hyper-parameters (including classifier-free guidance, iteration epochs, and output image resolution), and gather subjective scores that consider perceptual quality and text-to-image alignment altogether comprehensively involving 21 subjects. This approach culminates in the creation of the largest fine-grained AIGI subjective quality database to date with 20,000 AIGIs and 420,000 subjective ratings, known as AIGIQA-20K. Furthermore, we conduct benchmark experiments on this database to assess the correspondence between 16 mainstream AIGI quality models and human perception. We anticipate that this large-scale quality database will inspire robust quality indicators for AIGIs and propel the evolution of AIGC for vision. The database is released on https://www.modelscope.cn/datasets/lcysyzxdxc/AIGCQA-30K-Image.

Related papers

• A-Bench: Are LMMs Masters at Evaluating AI-generated Images? [78.3699767628502]
  A-Bench is a benchmark designed to diagnose whether multi-modal models (LMMs) are masters at evaluating AI-generated images (AIGIs) Ultimately, 2,864 AIGIs from 16 text-to-image models are sampled, each paired with question-answers annotated by human experts, and tested across 18 leading LMMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T08:55:02Z)
• Understanding and Evaluating Human Preferences for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuning [58.41087653543607]
  We first establish a novel Image Quality Assessment (IQA) database for AIGIs, termed AIGCIQA2023+. This paper presents a MINT-IQA model to evaluate and explain human preferences for AIGIs from Multi-perspectives with INstruction Tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T17:45:11Z)
• PKU-AIGIQA-4K: A Perceptual Quality Assessment Database for Both Text-to-Image and Image-to-Image AI-Generated Images [1.5265677582796984]
  We establish a large scale perceptual quality assessment database for both text-to-image and image-to-image AIGIs, named PKU-AIGIQA-4K. We propose three image quality assessment (IQA) methods based on pre-trained models that include a no-reference method NR-AIGCIQA, a full-reference method FR-AIGCIQA, and a partial-reference method PR-AIGCIQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T03:57:43Z)
• Large Multi-modality Model Assisted AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment [53.182136445844904]
  We introduce a large Multi-modality model Assisted AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment (MA-AGIQA) model. It uses semantically informed guidance to sense semantic information and extract semantic vectors through carefully designed text prompts. It achieves state-of-the-art performance, and demonstrates its superior generalization capabilities on assessing the quality of AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T02:40:36Z)
• AIGCOIQA2024: Perceptual Quality Assessment of AI Generated Omnidirectional Images [70.42666704072964]
  We establish a large-scale AI generated omnidirectional image IQA database named AIGCOIQA2024. A subjective IQA experiment is conducted to assess human visual preferences from three perspectives. We conduct a benchmark experiment to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art IQA models on our database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T10:08:23Z)
• PKU-I2IQA: An Image-to-Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Images [1.6031185986328562]
  We establish a human perception-based image-to-image AIGCIQA database, named PKU-I2IQA. We propose two benchmark models: NR-AIGCIQA based on the no-reference image quality assessment method and FR-AIGCIQA based on the full-reference image quality assessment method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T05:53:03Z)
• AIGCIQA2023: A Large-scale Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Images: from the Perspectives of Quality, Authenticity and Correspondence [42.85549933048976]
  We first generate over 2000 images based on 6 state-of-the-art text-to-image generation models using 100 prompts. Based on these images, a subjective experiment is conducted to assess the human visual preferences for each image from three perspectives. We conduct a benchmark experiment to evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art IQA metrics on our constructed database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T03:30:31Z)
• AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment [62.8834581626703]
  We build the most comprehensive subjective quality database AGIQA-3K so far. We conduct a benchmark experiment on this database to evaluate the consistency between the current Image Quality Assessment (IQA) model and human perception. We believe that the fine-grained subjective scores in AGIQA-3K will inspire subsequent AGI quality models to fit human subjective perception mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T18:28:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.