Red Teaming GPT-4V: Are GPT-4V Safe Against Uni/Multi-Modal Jailbreak Attacks?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03411v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:38:14 GMT
• Title: Red Teaming GPT-4V: Are GPT-4V Safe Against Uni/Multi-Modal Jailbreak Attacks?
• Authors: Shuo Chen, Zhen Han, Bailan He, Zifeng Ding, Wenqian Yu, Philip Torr, Volker Tresp, Jindong Gu,
• Abstract summary: This work builds a comprehensive jailbreak evaluation dataset with 1445 harmful questions covering 11 different safety policies. GPT4 and GPT-4V demonstrate better robustness against jailbreak attacks compared to open-source LLMs and MLLMs. Llama2 and Qwen-VL-Chat are more robust compared to other open-source models.
• Score: 39.87609532392292
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Various jailbreak attacks have been proposed to red-team Large Language Models (LLMs) and revealed the vulnerable safeguards of LLMs. Besides, some methods are not limited to the textual modality and extend the jailbreak attack to Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) by perturbing the visual input. However, the absence of a universal evaluation benchmark complicates the performance reproduction and fair comparison. Besides, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of closed-source state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, especially MLLMs, such as GPT-4V. To address these issues, this work first builds a comprehensive jailbreak evaluation dataset with 1445 harmful questions covering 11 different safety policies. Based on this dataset, extensive red-teaming experiments are conducted on 11 different LLMs and MLLMs, including both SOTA proprietary models and open-source models. We then conduct a deep analysis of the evaluated results and find that (1) GPT4 and GPT-4V demonstrate better robustness against jailbreak attacks compared to open-source LLMs and MLLMs. (2) Llama2 and Qwen-VL-Chat are more robust compared to other open-source models. (3) The transferability of visual jailbreak methods is relatively limited compared to textual jailbreak methods. The dataset and code can be found here https://anonymous.4open.science/r/red_teaming_gpt4-C1CE/README.md .

Related papers

• WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models [66.34505141027624]
  We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics. WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T17:31:22Z)
• JailBreakV-28K: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks [24.69275959735538]
  This paper investigates whether techniques that successfully jailbreak Large Language Models can be equally effective in jailbreaking MLLMs. We introduce JailBreakV-28K, a pioneering benchmark designed to assess the transferability of LLM jailbreak techniques to MLLMs. We generate 20, 000 text-based jailbreak prompts using advanced jailbreak attacks on LLMs, alongside 8, 000 image-based jailbreak inputs from recent MLLMs jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T19:23:18Z)
• EasyJailbreak: A Unified Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [53.87416566981008]
  This paper introduces EasyJailbreak, a unified framework simplifying the construction and evaluation of jailbreak attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs) It builds jailbreak attacks using four components: Selector, Mutator, Constraint, and Evaluator. Our validation across 10 distinct LLMs reveals a significant vulnerability, with an average breach probability of 60% under various jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T18:39:53Z)
• Comprehensive Assessment of Jailbreak Attacks Against LLMs [28.58973312098698]
  We study 13 cutting-edge jailbreak methods from four categories, 160 questions from 16 violation categories, and six popular LLMs. Our experimental results demonstrate that the optimized jailbreak prompts consistently achieve the highest attack success rates. We discuss the trade-off between the attack performance and efficiency, as well as show that the transferability of the jailbreak prompts is still viable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T13:42:50Z)
• Jailbreaking Attack against Multimodal Large Language Model [69.52466793164618]
  This paper focuses on jailbreaking attacks against multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) A maximum likelihood-based algorithm is proposed to find an emphimage Jailbreaking Prompt (imgJP) Our approach exhibits strong model-transferability, as the generated imgJP can be transferred to jailbreak various models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T01:29:24Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Models [96.50953637783581]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. Existing jailbreaking methods are computationally costly. We propose the weak-to-strong jailbreaking attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T18:48:37Z)
• Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries [97.29563503097995]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial jailbreaks. We propose an algorithm that generates semantic jailbreaks with only black-box access to an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T15:38:28Z)
• Tricking LLMs into Disobedience: Formalizing, Analyzing, and Detecting Jailbreaks [12.540530764250812]
  We propose a formalism and a taxonomy of known (and possible) jailbreaks. We release a dataset of model outputs across 3700 jailbreak prompts over 4 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T09:57:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.